Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Rosa VAN MOURIK |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Auditory conflict processing in ADHD / Rosa VAN MOURIK in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52-3 (March 2011)
[article]
Titre : Auditory conflict processing in ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Rosa VAN MOURIK, Auteur ; Joseph A. SERGEANT, Auteur ; Dirk J. HESLENFELD, Auteur ; Claudia KONIG, Auteur ; Jaap OOSTERLAAN, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.265-274 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ADHD interference conflict auditory Stroop event-related potentials (ERPs) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Impaired cognitive control has been implicated as an important developmental pathway to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Cognitive control is crucial to suppress interference resulting from conflicting information and can be measured by Stroop-like tasks. This study was conducted to gain insight into conflict processing in children with ADHD.
Methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in an auditory Stroop task. Twenty-four children with ADHD were compared with 24 control children (aged 8–12 years).
Results: No deficit in interference control was found on the auditory Stroop task in children with ADHD. Children with ADHD responded more slowly, less accurately and more variably compared to controls. No differences between the groups occurred in the early conflict-related ERPs. However, the difference between the congruent and the incongruent condition in the 450–550 ms time window was absent in the ADHD group compared to controls. In addition, the conflict sustained potential was found frontally in the ADHD group but parietally in the control group.
Conclusions: These ERP findings suggest that children with ADHD evaluate conflict to a lesser extent and differ in the way their brains select appropriate responses during conflict compared with controls.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02339.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-3 (March 2011) . - p.265-274[article] Auditory conflict processing in ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rosa VAN MOURIK, Auteur ; Joseph A. SERGEANT, Auteur ; Dirk J. HESLENFELD, Auteur ; Claudia KONIG, Auteur ; Jaap OOSTERLAAN, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.265-274.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-3 (March 2011) . - p.265-274
Mots-clés : ADHD interference conflict auditory Stroop event-related potentials (ERPs) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Impaired cognitive control has been implicated as an important developmental pathway to attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Cognitive control is crucial to suppress interference resulting from conflicting information and can be measured by Stroop-like tasks. This study was conducted to gain insight into conflict processing in children with ADHD.
Methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in an auditory Stroop task. Twenty-four children with ADHD were compared with 24 control children (aged 8–12 years).
Results: No deficit in interference control was found on the auditory Stroop task in children with ADHD. Children with ADHD responded more slowly, less accurately and more variably compared to controls. No differences between the groups occurred in the early conflict-related ERPs. However, the difference between the congruent and the incongruent condition in the 450–550 ms time window was absent in the ADHD group compared to controls. In addition, the conflict sustained potential was found frontally in the ADHD group but parietally in the control group.
Conclusions: These ERP findings suggest that children with ADHD evaluate conflict to a lesser extent and differ in the way their brains select appropriate responses during conflict compared with controls.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02339.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118 A randomized controlled trial into the effects of neurofeedback, methylphenidate, and physical activity on EEG power spectra in children with ADHD / Tieme W. P. JANSSEN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57-5 (May 2016)
[article]
Titre : A randomized controlled trial into the effects of neurofeedback, methylphenidate, and physical activity on EEG power spectra in children with ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Tieme W. P. JANSSEN, Auteur ; Marleen BINK, Auteur ; Katleen GELADE, Auteur ; Rosa VAN MOURIK, Auteur ; Athanasios MARAS, Auteur ; Jaap OOSTERLAAN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.633-644 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ADHD neurofeedback methylphenidate physical activity EEG RCT Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The clinical and neurophysiological effects of neurofeedback (NF) as treatment for children with ADHD are still unclear. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectra before and after NF compared to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment and physical activity (PA) – as semi-active control group – during resting and active (effortful) task conditions to determine whether NF can induce sustained alterations in brain function. Methods Using a multicentre three-way parallel group RCT design, 112 children with a DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD, aged between 7 and 13 years, were initially included. NF training consisted of 30 sessions of theta/beta training at Cz over a 10-week period. PA training was a semi-active control group, matched in frequency and duration. Methylphenidate was titrated using a double-blind placebo controlled procedure in 6 weeks, followed by a stable dose for 4 weeks. EEG power spectra measures during eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC) and task (effortful) conditions were available for 81 children at pre- and postintervention (n = 29 NF, n = 25 MPH, n = 27 PA). Clinical trials registration: Train Your Brain? Exercise and Neurofeedback Intervention for ADHD, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/;NCT01363544, Ref. No. NCT01363544. Results Both NF and MPH resulted in comparable reductions in theta power from pre- to postintervention during the EO condition compared to PA (?p2 = .08 and .12). For NF, greater reductions in theta were related to greater reductions in ADHD symptoms. During the task condition, only MPH showed reductions in theta and alpha power compared to PA (?p2 = .10 and .12). Conclusions This study provides evidence for specific neurophysiological effects after theta/beta NF and MPH treatment in children with ADHD. However, for NF these effects did not generalize to an active task condition, potentially explaining reduced behavioural effects of NF in the classroom. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12517 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=288
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-5 (May 2016) . - p.633-644[article] A randomized controlled trial into the effects of neurofeedback, methylphenidate, and physical activity on EEG power spectra in children with ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Tieme W. P. JANSSEN, Auteur ; Marleen BINK, Auteur ; Katleen GELADE, Auteur ; Rosa VAN MOURIK, Auteur ; Athanasios MARAS, Auteur ; Jaap OOSTERLAAN, Auteur . - p.633-644.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-5 (May 2016) . - p.633-644
Mots-clés : ADHD neurofeedback methylphenidate physical activity EEG RCT Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The clinical and neurophysiological effects of neurofeedback (NF) as treatment for children with ADHD are still unclear. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined electroencephalogram (EEG) power spectra before and after NF compared to methylphenidate (MPH) treatment and physical activity (PA) – as semi-active control group – during resting and active (effortful) task conditions to determine whether NF can induce sustained alterations in brain function. Methods Using a multicentre three-way parallel group RCT design, 112 children with a DSM-IV diagnosis of ADHD, aged between 7 and 13 years, were initially included. NF training consisted of 30 sessions of theta/beta training at Cz over a 10-week period. PA training was a semi-active control group, matched in frequency and duration. Methylphenidate was titrated using a double-blind placebo controlled procedure in 6 weeks, followed by a stable dose for 4 weeks. EEG power spectra measures during eyes open (EO), eyes closed (EC) and task (effortful) conditions were available for 81 children at pre- and postintervention (n = 29 NF, n = 25 MPH, n = 27 PA). Clinical trials registration: Train Your Brain? Exercise and Neurofeedback Intervention for ADHD, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/;NCT01363544, Ref. No. NCT01363544. Results Both NF and MPH resulted in comparable reductions in theta power from pre- to postintervention during the EO condition compared to PA (?p2 = .08 and .12). For NF, greater reductions in theta were related to greater reductions in ADHD symptoms. During the task condition, only MPH showed reductions in theta and alpha power compared to PA (?p2 = .10 and .12). Conclusions This study provides evidence for specific neurophysiological effects after theta/beta NF and MPH treatment in children with ADHD. However, for NF these effects did not generalize to an active task condition, potentially explaining reduced behavioural effects of NF in the classroom. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12517 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=288