Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Evelyn SHAW |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Assessing implementation of comprehensive treatment models for young children with ASD: Reliability and validity of two measures / Kara HUME in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5-4 (October-December 2011)
[article]
Titre : Assessing implementation of comprehensive treatment models for young children with ASD: Reliability and validity of two measures Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kara HUME, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur ; Matt MCBEE, Auteur ; Drew C. COMAN, Auteur ; Anibal Jr GUTIERREZ, Auteur ; Evelyn SHAW, Auteur ; Laurie SPERRY, Auteur ; Michael ALESSANDRI, Auteur ; Samuel L ODOM, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.1430-1440 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Comprehensive treatment models Treatment implementation Treatment integrity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Treatment implementation is an under-studied and under-reported aspect of intervention studies involving individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One primary area of concern is the lack of reliable and valid implementation measures, which allows a conclusive association to be drawn between the intervention and participant outcomes. This study examined the psychometric properties of two implementation measures developed for comprehensive treatment models serving preschoolers with ASD (i.e., LEAP and TEACCH). Both of the measures were completed in classrooms using LEAP or TEACCH instructional approaches as well as in classrooms in which a business-as-usual or non-model specific treatment approach was used. Across four months of one school year, a maximum of 4 observations were conducted in each of the 34 classrooms involved in the study. Results indicated that both implementation tools are reliable and valid, and that particular subscales of these measures allowed for discrimination of the three types of classrooms from each other. This step of psychometrically validating implementation measures as part of conducting efficacy studies may yield more robust associations between implementation and intervention effects. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=125
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 5-4 (October-December 2011) . - p.1430-1440[article] Assessing implementation of comprehensive treatment models for young children with ASD: Reliability and validity of two measures [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kara HUME, Auteur ; Brian A. BOYD, Auteur ; Matt MCBEE, Auteur ; Drew C. COMAN, Auteur ; Anibal Jr GUTIERREZ, Auteur ; Evelyn SHAW, Auteur ; Laurie SPERRY, Auteur ; Michael ALESSANDRI, Auteur ; Samuel L ODOM, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.1430-1440.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 5-4 (October-December 2011) . - p.1430-1440
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Comprehensive treatment models Treatment implementation Treatment integrity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Treatment implementation is an under-studied and under-reported aspect of intervention studies involving individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). One primary area of concern is the lack of reliable and valid implementation measures, which allows a conclusive association to be drawn between the intervention and participant outcomes. This study examined the psychometric properties of two implementation measures developed for comprehensive treatment models serving preschoolers with ASD (i.e., LEAP and TEACCH). Both of the measures were completed in classrooms using LEAP or TEACCH instructional approaches as well as in classrooms in which a business-as-usual or non-model specific treatment approach was used. Across four months of one school year, a maximum of 4 observations were conducted in each of the 34 classrooms involved in the study. Results indicated that both implementation tools are reliable and valid, and that particular subscales of these measures allowed for discrimination of the three types of classrooms from each other. This step of psychometrically validating implementation measures as part of conducting efficacy studies may yield more robust associations between implementation and intervention effects. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.02.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=125