Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur H. Z. GASTGEB |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples / Carla A. MAZEFSKY in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43-5 (May 2013)
[article]
Titre : Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Carla A. MAZEFSKY, Auteur ; James C. MCPARTLAND, Auteur ; H. Z. GASTGEB, Auteur ; Nancy J. MINSHEW, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1236-1242 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Diagnosis Assessment DSM-5 Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1665-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=195
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 43-5 (May 2013) . - p.1236-1242[article] Brief Report: Comparability of DSM-IV and DSM-5 ASD Research Samples [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Carla A. MAZEFSKY, Auteur ; James C. MCPARTLAND, Auteur ; H. Z. GASTGEB, Auteur ; Nancy J. MINSHEW, Auteur . - p.1236-1242.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 43-5 (May 2013) . - p.1236-1242
Mots-clés : Autism Diagnosis Assessment DSM-5 Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for ASD have been criticized for being too restrictive, especially for more cognitively-able individuals. It is unclear, however, if high-functioning individuals deemed eligible for research via standardized diagnostic assessments would meet DSM-5 criteria. This study investigated the impact of DSM-5 on the diagnostic status of 498 high-functioning participants with ASD research diagnoses. The percent of participants satisfying all DSM-5-requirements varied significantly with reliance on data from the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS; 33 %) versus Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R; 83 %), highlighting the impact of diagnostic methodology on ability to document DSM-5 symptoms. Utilizing combined ADOS/ADI-R data, 93 % of participants met DSM-5 criteria, which suggests likely continuity between DSM-IV and DSM-5 research samples characterized with these instruments in combination. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1665-y Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=195