Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Flaura WINSTON |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
The latent structure of Acute Stress Disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed children and adolescents / Anna MCKINNON in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57-11 (November 2016)
[article]
Titre : The latent structure of Acute Stress Disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed children and adolescents Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Anna MCKINNON, Auteur ; Richard MEISER-STEDMAN, Auteur ; Peter WATSON, Auteur ; Clare DIXON, Auteur ; Nancy KASSAM-ADAMS, Auteur ; Anke EHLERS, Auteur ; Flaura WINSTON, Auteur ; Patrick SMITH, Auteur ; William YULE, Auteur ; Tim DALGLEISH, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1308-1316 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Acute Stress Disorder DSM-5 factor analysis children post-traumatic stress disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The revision of Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) in the DSM-5 (DSM-5, 2013) proposes a cluster-free model of ASD symptoms in both adults and youth. Published evaluations of competing models of ASD clustering in youth have rarely been examined. Methods We used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (combined with multigroup invariance tests) to explore the latent structure of ASD symptoms in a trauma-exposed sample of children and young people (N = 594). The DSM-5 structure was compared with the previous DSM-IV conceptualization (4-factor), and two alternative models proposed in the literature (3-factor; 5-factor). Model fit was examined using goodness-of-fit indices. We also established DSM-5 ASD prevalence rates relative to DSM-IV ASD, and the ability of these models to classify children impaired by their symptoms. Results Based on both the Bayesian Information Criterion, the interfactor correlations and invariance testing, the 3-factor model best accounted for the profile of ASD symptoms. DSM-5 ASD led to slightly higher prevalence rates than DSM-IV ASD and performed similarly to DSM-IV with respect to categorising children impaired by their symptoms. Modifying the DSM-5 ASD algorithm to a 3+ or 4+ symptom requirement was the strongest predictor of impairment. Conclusions These findings suggest that a uni-factorial general-distress model is not the optimal model of capturing the latent structure of ASD symptom profiles in youth and that modifying the current DSM-5 9+ symptom algorithm could potentially lead to a more developmentally sensitive conceptualization. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12597 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=295
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-11 (November 2016) . - p.1308-1316[article] The latent structure of Acute Stress Disorder symptoms in trauma-exposed children and adolescents [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Anna MCKINNON, Auteur ; Richard MEISER-STEDMAN, Auteur ; Peter WATSON, Auteur ; Clare DIXON, Auteur ; Nancy KASSAM-ADAMS, Auteur ; Anke EHLERS, Auteur ; Flaura WINSTON, Auteur ; Patrick SMITH, Auteur ; William YULE, Auteur ; Tim DALGLEISH, Auteur . - p.1308-1316.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-11 (November 2016) . - p.1308-1316
Mots-clés : Acute Stress Disorder DSM-5 factor analysis children post-traumatic stress disorder Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The revision of Acute Stress Disorder (ASD) in the DSM-5 (DSM-5, 2013) proposes a cluster-free model of ASD symptoms in both adults and youth. Published evaluations of competing models of ASD clustering in youth have rarely been examined. Methods We used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (combined with multigroup invariance tests) to explore the latent structure of ASD symptoms in a trauma-exposed sample of children and young people (N = 594). The DSM-5 structure was compared with the previous DSM-IV conceptualization (4-factor), and two alternative models proposed in the literature (3-factor; 5-factor). Model fit was examined using goodness-of-fit indices. We also established DSM-5 ASD prevalence rates relative to DSM-IV ASD, and the ability of these models to classify children impaired by their symptoms. Results Based on both the Bayesian Information Criterion, the interfactor correlations and invariance testing, the 3-factor model best accounted for the profile of ASD symptoms. DSM-5 ASD led to slightly higher prevalence rates than DSM-IV ASD and performed similarly to DSM-IV with respect to categorising children impaired by their symptoms. Modifying the DSM-5 ASD algorithm to a 3+ or 4+ symptom requirement was the strongest predictor of impairment. Conclusions These findings suggest that a uni-factorial general-distress model is not the optimal model of capturing the latent structure of ASD symptom profiles in youth and that modifying the current DSM-5 9+ symptom algorithm could potentially lead to a more developmentally sensitive conceptualization. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12597 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=295