Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Susan M. NICHOLS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Evidence-Based Practices / Kevin CALLAHAN
Titre : Evidence-Based Practices Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kevin CALLAHAN, Auteur ; Susan M. NICHOLS, Auteur Année de publication : 2019 Importance : p.194-202 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : AUT-F AUT-F - L'Autisme - Soins Résumé : When looking for effective therapies and supports for individuals with ASD, clinicians and parents need to be aware of the available effective treatment and consider factors such as the severity of symptoms of the individual. It is also important for clinicians to be able to evaluate the evidence of effectiveness for potential therapeutic approaches. Being familiar with comprehensive treatment models such as applied behavior analysis, the Denver Model, and TEACCH are also key. In this chapter, the authors provide an overview of evidence-based services available to families with children with ASD. Specifically, the authors discuss applied behavior analysis because applied behavior analysis is considered by many to be the most familiar and frequently used model in ASD intervention. Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=417 Evidence-Based Practices [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kevin CALLAHAN, Auteur ; Susan M. NICHOLS, Auteur . - 2019 . - p.194-202.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Index. décimale : AUT-F AUT-F - L'Autisme - Soins Résumé : When looking for effective therapies and supports for individuals with ASD, clinicians and parents need to be aware of the available effective treatment and consider factors such as the severity of symptoms of the individual. It is also important for clinicians to be able to evaluate the evidence of effectiveness for potential therapeutic approaches. Being familiar with comprehensive treatment models such as applied behavior analysis, the Denver Model, and TEACCH are also key. In this chapter, the authors provide an overview of evidence-based services available to families with children with ASD. Specifically, the authors discuss applied behavior analysis because applied behavior analysis is considered by many to be the most familiar and frequently used model in ASD intervention. Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=417 Exemplaires
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité aucun exemplaire Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism / Kevin CALLAHAN in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32-3 (September 2017)
[article]
Titre : Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kevin CALLAHAN, Auteur ; Heather L. HUGHES, Auteur ; Smita MEHTA, Auteur ; Karen A. TOUSSAINT, Auteur ; Susan M. NICHOLS, Auteur ; Phoenix S. MA, Auteur ; Metehan KUTLU, Auteur ; Hui-Ting WANG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.188-197 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088357616632446 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=313
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 32-3 (September 2017) . - p.188-197[article] Social Validity of Evidence-Based Practices and Emerging Interventions in Autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kevin CALLAHAN, Auteur ; Heather L. HUGHES, Auteur ; Smita MEHTA, Auteur ; Karen A. TOUSSAINT, Auteur ; Susan M. NICHOLS, Auteur ; Phoenix S. MA, Auteur ; Metehan KUTLU, Auteur ; Hui-Ting WANG, Auteur . - p.188-197.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 32-3 (September 2017) . - p.188-197
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Although social validation of the goals, methods, and outcomes of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in autism treatment is a significant factor in their selection and effective use, EBPs are typically identified on the basis of the technical soundness of research without consideration of social validity. The authors investigated EBPs and emerging treatments identified by the National Autism Center (NAC) and National Professional Development Center on Autism Spectrum Disorders (NPDC) to determine which interventions have evidence of social validity, and the types of social validation addressed. A review of 828 articles cited by the NAC and NPDC determined that only 221 articles (26.7%) demonstrated direct evidence of the measurement of social validation. Of seven social validity categories analyzed, only consumer satisfaction, clinically significant behavioral change, and socially important dependent variables were consistently reported. A list of EBPs with varying levels of social and empirical validation is presented, and implications for future research are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088357616632446 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=313