Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Cathy H. QI |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A Systematic Review of Effects of Social Stories Interventions for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder / Cathy H. QI in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33-1 (March 2018)
[article]
Titre : A Systematic Review of Effects of Social Stories Interventions for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Cathy H. QI, Auteur ; Erin E. BARTON, Auteur ; Margo COLLIER, Auteur ; Yi-Ling LIN, Auteur ; Charisse MONTOYA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.25-34 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder,social stories,systematic review,single-case research design Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize 22 single-case research design (SCRD) studies on social stories intervention for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We used the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) SCRD standards to analyze study rigor and evidence of a causal relation. We calculated four nonoverlap indices to evaluate intervention, maintenance, and generalization effects. Results suggested that all studies met the WWC design standards with or without reservations. Seven studies (32%) provided strong or moderate evidence of a causal relation. Nonoverlap indices calculations indicated social stories intervention was effective. Using the WWC 5-3-20 guidelines to determine evidence of social stories, social stories intervention would not be considered an evidence-based practice (EBP) for individuals with ASD based on visual analysis, but would be deemed an EBP based on nonoverlap indices. It is worth noting that WWC used visual analysis, not nonoveralap indices, to determine whether an intervention meets the 5-3-20 replication rule. Findings of the systematic review showed there were discrepancies. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615613516 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=336
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-1 (March 2018) . - p.25-34[article] A Systematic Review of Effects of Social Stories Interventions for Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Cathy H. QI, Auteur ; Erin E. BARTON, Auteur ; Margo COLLIER, Auteur ; Yi-Ling LIN, Auteur ; Charisse MONTOYA, Auteur . - p.25-34.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-1 (March 2018) . - p.25-34
Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorder,social stories,systematic review,single-case research design Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize 22 single-case research design (SCRD) studies on social stories intervention for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We used the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) SCRD standards to analyze study rigor and evidence of a causal relation. We calculated four nonoverlap indices to evaluate intervention, maintenance, and generalization effects. Results suggested that all studies met the WWC design standards with or without reservations. Seven studies (32%) provided strong or moderate evidence of a causal relation. Nonoverlap indices calculations indicated social stories intervention was effective. Using the WWC 5-3-20 guidelines to determine evidence of social stories, social stories intervention would not be considered an evidence-based practice (EBP) for individuals with ASD based on visual analysis, but would be deemed an EBP based on nonoverlap indices. It is worth noting that WWC used visual analysis, not nonoveralap indices, to determine whether an intervention meets the 5-3-20 replication rule. Findings of the systematic review showed there were discrepancies. Implications for future research and practice are discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615613516 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=336