Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Timo SALOVIITA |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Does Linguistic Analysis Confirm the Validity of Facilitated Communication? / Timo SALOVIITA in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33-2 (June 2018)
[article]
Titre : Does Linguistic Analysis Confirm the Validity of Facilitated Communication? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Timo SALOVIITA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.91-99 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Facilitated communication (FC) has been interpreted as an ideomotor phenomenon, in which one person physically supports another person?s hand and unconsciously affects the content of the writing. Despite the strong experimental evidence against the authenticity of FC output, several studies claim to support its validity based on idiosyncrasies found in the texts produced. A review of these studies showed that, because of the logical circularity of the reasoning proposed in the studies, no decisive evidence that validated FC was presented. In addition, the idiosyncrasies found were better explained as by-products of the unusual writing process itself. Finally, the studies did not fulfill the quality standards proposed by the FC field itself. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616646075 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=363
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-2 (June 2018) . - p.91-99[article] Does Linguistic Analysis Confirm the Validity of Facilitated Communication? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Timo SALOVIITA, Auteur . - p.91-99.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-2 (June 2018) . - p.91-99
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Facilitated communication (FC) has been interpreted as an ideomotor phenomenon, in which one person physically supports another person?s hand and unconsciously affects the content of the writing. Despite the strong experimental evidence against the authenticity of FC output, several studies claim to support its validity based on idiosyncrasies found in the texts produced. A review of these studies showed that, because of the logical circularity of the reasoning proposed in the studies, no decisive evidence that validated FC was presented. In addition, the idiosyncrasies found were better explained as by-products of the unusual writing process itself. Finally, the studies did not fulfill the quality standards proposed by the FC field itself. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616646075 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=363