Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Gerald H. BURGESS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Using the AQ-10 with adults who have a borderline or mild intellectual disability: Pilot analysis of an adapted AQ-10 (AQ-10-Intellectual Disability) / Elizabeth C. KENT in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 54 (October 2018)
[article]
Titre : Using the AQ-10 with adults who have a borderline or mild intellectual disability: Pilot analysis of an adapted AQ-10 (AQ-10-Intellectual Disability) Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Elizabeth C. KENT, Auteur ; Gerald H. BURGESS, Auteur ; Elizabeth KILBEY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.65-75 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Intellectual disability Autism spectrum disorder Intellectual impairment Screening Case identification AQ-10 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background There is a need for appropriate screening tools for case identification of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in those with intellectual disabilities (ID) given the high co-occurrence of the two conditions. The AQ-10 is the screening tool recommended by NICE for the identification of ASD in adults with a borderline or mild intellectual disability. However, the AQ-10 was not developed with this population in mind. Method A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate the utility of the AQ-10 in its original form as a case identification tool. The AQ-10 was then redesigned and piloted. Qualitative results revealed individuals with a borderline or mild ID found the AQ-10 too inaccessible in its current format. Results Following revision, the diagnostic validity of the revised measure (AQ-10-ID) showed good sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.77), whereas the diagnostic validity of the original AQ-10 was poor. The internal consistency for the AQ-10-ID was 0.67 and 0.30 for the AQ-10. Conclusions These findings indicate that changes may be needed to the AQ-10 before clinicians consider using as a screen tools for adults with an intellectual disability. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.06.010 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 54 (October 2018) . - p.65-75[article] Using the AQ-10 with adults who have a borderline or mild intellectual disability: Pilot analysis of an adapted AQ-10 (AQ-10-Intellectual Disability) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Elizabeth C. KENT, Auteur ; Gerald H. BURGESS, Auteur ; Elizabeth KILBEY, Auteur . - p.65-75.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 54 (October 2018) . - p.65-75
Mots-clés : Intellectual disability Autism spectrum disorder Intellectual impairment Screening Case identification AQ-10 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background There is a need for appropriate screening tools for case identification of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in those with intellectual disabilities (ID) given the high co-occurrence of the two conditions. The AQ-10 is the screening tool recommended by NICE for the identification of ASD in adults with a borderline or mild intellectual disability. However, the AQ-10 was not developed with this population in mind. Method A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate the utility of the AQ-10 in its original form as a case identification tool. The AQ-10 was then redesigned and piloted. Qualitative results revealed individuals with a borderline or mild ID found the AQ-10 too inaccessible in its current format. Results Following revision, the diagnostic validity of the revised measure (AQ-10-ID) showed good sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.77), whereas the diagnostic validity of the original AQ-10 was poor. The internal consistency for the AQ-10-ID was 0.67 and 0.30 for the AQ-10. Conclusions These findings indicate that changes may be needed to the AQ-10 before clinicians consider using as a screen tools for adults with an intellectual disability. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.06.010 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368