Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Caitlin COUGHLER |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Analysis of the quality of online resources for parents of children who are late to talk / Caitlin COUGHLER in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 5 (January-December 2020)
[article]
Titre : Analysis of the quality of online resources for parents of children who are late to talk Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Caitlin COUGHLER, Auteur ; Shauna M BURKE, Auteur ; Janis ORAM CARDY, Auteur Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Late talker website evaluation language children parents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background and aimsInternet usage worldwide has become a primary source of health-related information and an important resource for parents to find advice on how to promote their child’s development and well-being. It is important that healthcare professionals understand what information is available to parents online to best support families and children. The current study evaluated the quality of online resources accessible for parents of children who are late to talk.MethodFifty-four web pages were evaluated for their usability and reliability using the LIDA instrument and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and readability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Origin, author(s), target audience, topics discussed, terminology used, and recommendations were also examined.ResultsThe majority of websites scored within the moderate range (50–90%) for total LIDA scores and usability, but scored in the low range for reliability (<50%). Significantly higher reliability scores (p?0.001) were found for sites with Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification. Readability fell within the standard range. The largest proportion of websites were American, written by speech-language pathologists, with the most common topics being milestones, tips and strategies, and red flags. Discrepancies were mostly seen in terminology and misinformation, and when present, usually related to risk factors and causes.ConclusionPrior to recommending websites to parents, health professionals should consider readability of the content, check that information is up-to-date, and confirm website sources and reputable authorship. Health professionals should also be aware of the types of unclear or inaccurate information to which parents of children who are late to talk may be exposed online. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396941520917940 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=438
in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments > 5 (January-December 2020)[article] Analysis of the quality of online resources for parents of children who are late to talk [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Caitlin COUGHLER, Auteur ; Shauna M BURKE, Auteur ; Janis ORAM CARDY, Auteur.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism & Developmental Language Impairments > 5 (January-December 2020)
Mots-clés : Late talker website evaluation language children parents Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background and aimsInternet usage worldwide has become a primary source of health-related information and an important resource for parents to find advice on how to promote their child’s development and well-being. It is important that healthcare professionals understand what information is available to parents online to best support families and children. The current study evaluated the quality of online resources accessible for parents of children who are late to talk.MethodFifty-four web pages were evaluated for their usability and reliability using the LIDA instrument and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and readability using the Flesch Reading Ease Score and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Origin, author(s), target audience, topics discussed, terminology used, and recommendations were also examined.ResultsThe majority of websites scored within the moderate range (50–90%) for total LIDA scores and usability, but scored in the low range for reliability (<50%). Significantly higher reliability scores (p?0.001) were found for sites with Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification. Readability fell within the standard range. The largest proportion of websites were American, written by speech-language pathologists, with the most common topics being milestones, tips and strategies, and red flags. Discrepancies were mostly seen in terminology and misinformation, and when present, usually related to risk factors and causes.ConclusionPrior to recommending websites to parents, health professionals should consider readability of the content, check that information is up-to-date, and confirm website sources and reputable authorship. Health professionals should also be aware of the types of unclear or inaccurate information to which parents of children who are late to talk may be exposed online. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2396941520917940 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=438