Subfactors of oppositional defiant disorder: converging evidence from structural and latent class analyses / Kathrin HERZHOFF in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57-1 (January 2016)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-1 (January 2016) . - p.18-29 Titre : Subfactors of oppositional defiant disorder: converging evidence from structural and latent class analyses Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kathrin HERZHOFF, Auteur ; Jennifer L. TACKETT, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.18-29 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Oppositional Defiant Disorder  comorbidity  irritability  personality  childhood  latent class analysis  gender differences Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Structural models of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms have gained empirical support but await greater empirical scrutiny on issues such as reconciliation between competing models, evidence for gender differences, and delineation of external correlates. More extensive validation evidence is particularly necessary in consideration of their incorporation in psychiatric nomenclature. Methods We fitted previously proposed, but competing, models to ODD symptoms assessed with the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (Shaffer et al., 2000, J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 39, 28) in a community sample and then fitted the best-fitting model in a replication sample (combined N = 730, Mage = 9.89, SD = 0.75). Analyses also examined potential classes based on resulting subfactors, gender differences, longitudinal associations with later behavioral problems, and concurrent personality associations. Results Burke's (2010) two-factor model composed of Irritability and Oppositionality subfactors best fit the data. Irritability and Oppositionality showed convergent and divergent patterns of association with personality traits at T1 and with externalizing and internalizing problems at T2. Latent class analyses revealed three classes (low severity, irritable/combined, and oppositional) which showed parallel divergence in externalizing and internalizing problem comorbidity. These findings were largely robust across gender and samples. Conclusions These findings support Irritability/Oppositionality subfactors of ODD in two mixed-gender samples, demonstrate strong evidence for a lack of gender differences in such subfactors, and demonstrate their convergent and divergent validity in emergent latent classes, later behavioral problems, and personality correlates. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12423 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=273 [article] Subfactors of oppositional defiant disorder: converging evidence from structural and latent class analyses [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kathrin HERZHOFF, Auteur ; Jennifer L. TACKETT, Auteur . - p.18-29. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-1 (January 2016) . - p.18-29 Mots-clés : Oppositional Defiant Disorder  comorbidity  irritability  personality  childhood  latent class analysis  gender differences Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Structural models of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms have gained empirical support but await greater empirical scrutiny on issues such as reconciliation between competing models, evidence for gender differences, and delineation of external correlates. More extensive validation evidence is particularly necessary in consideration of their incorporation in psychiatric nomenclature. Methods We fitted previously proposed, but competing, models to ODD symptoms assessed with the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (Shaffer et al., 2000, J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 39, 28) in a community sample and then fitted the best-fitting model in a replication sample (combined N = 730, Mage = 9.89, SD = 0.75). Analyses also examined potential classes based on resulting subfactors, gender differences, longitudinal associations with later behavioral problems, and concurrent personality associations. Results Burke's (2010) two-factor model composed of Irritability and Oppositionality subfactors best fit the data. Irritability and Oppositionality showed convergent and divergent patterns of association with personality traits at T1 and with externalizing and internalizing problems at T2. Latent class analyses revealed three classes (low severity, irritable/combined, and oppositional) which showed parallel divergence in externalizing and internalizing problem comorbidity. These findings were largely robust across gender and samples. Conclusions These findings support Irritability/Oppositionality subfactors of ODD in two mixed-gender samples, demonstrate strong evidence for a lack of gender differences in such subfactors, and demonstrate their convergent and divergent validity in emergent latent classes, later behavioral problems, and personality correlates. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12423 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=273

Viewing relational aggression through multiple lenses: Temperament, personality, and personality pathology / Jennifer L. TACKETT in Development and Psychopathology, 26-3 (August 2014)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 26-3 (August 2014) . - p.863-877 Titre : Viewing relational aggression through multiple lenses: Temperament, personality, and personality pathology Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jennifer L. TACKETT, Auteur ; Shauna C. KUSHNER, Auteur ; Kathrin HERZHOFF, Auteur ; Avante J. SMACK, Auteur ; Kathleen W. REARDON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.863-877 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Dispositional trait frameworks offer great potential to elucidate the nature and development of psychopathology, including the construct of relational aggression. The present study sought to explore the dispositional context of relational aggression across three dispositional frameworks: temperament, personality, and personality pathology. Participants comprised a large community sample of youth, aged 6 to 18 years (N = 1,188; 51.2% female). Ratings of children's relational aggression, temperament, personality, and personality pathology traits were obtained through parent report (86.3% mothers). Results showed convergence and divergence across these three dispositional frameworks. Like other antisocial behavior subtypes, relational aggression generally showed connections with traits reflecting negative emotionality and poor self-regulation. Relational aggression showed stronger connections with temperament traits than with personality traits, suggesting that temperament frameworks may capture more relationally aggressive content. Findings at the lower order trait level help differentiate relational aggression from other externalizing problems by providing a more nuanced perspective (e.g., both sociability and shyness positively predicted relational aggression). In addition, there was little evidence of moderation of these associations by gender, age, or age2, and findings remained robust even after controlling for physical aggression. Results are discussed in the broader context of conceptualizing relational aggression in an overarching personality-psychopathology framework. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000443 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=238 [article] Viewing relational aggression through multiple lenses: Temperament, personality, and personality pathology [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jennifer L. TACKETT, Auteur ; Shauna C. KUSHNER, Auteur ; Kathrin HERZHOFF, Auteur ; Avante J. SMACK, Auteur ; Kathleen W. REARDON, Auteur . - p.863-877. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 26-3 (August 2014) . - p.863-877 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Dispositional trait frameworks offer great potential to elucidate the nature and development of psychopathology, including the construct of relational aggression. The present study sought to explore the dispositional context of relational aggression across three dispositional frameworks: temperament, personality, and personality pathology. Participants comprised a large community sample of youth, aged 6 to 18 years (N = 1,188; 51.2% female). Ratings of children's relational aggression, temperament, personality, and personality pathology traits were obtained through parent report (86.3% mothers). Results showed convergence and divergence across these three dispositional frameworks. Like other antisocial behavior subtypes, relational aggression generally showed connections with traits reflecting negative emotionality and poor self-regulation. Relational aggression showed stronger connections with temperament traits than with personality traits, suggesting that temperament frameworks may capture more relationally aggressive content. Findings at the lower order trait level help differentiate relational aggression from other externalizing problems by providing a more nuanced perspective (e.g., both sociability and shyness positively predicted relational aggression). In addition, there was little evidence of moderation of these associations by gender, age, or age2, and findings remained robust even after controlling for physical aggression. Results are discussed in the broader context of conceptualizing relational aggression in an overarching personality-psychopathology framework. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000443 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=238

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)