[article]
| Titre : |
Clinical distinction between cognitive disengagement syndrome and ADHD presentations in a nationally representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents |
| Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
| Auteurs : |
G. Leonard BURNS, Auteur ; Stephen P. BECKER, Auteur ; Juan José MONTAÑO, Auteur ; Mateu SERVERA, Auteur |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.1601-1611 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder cognitive disengagement syndrome comorbidity sluggish cognitive tempo transdiagnostic |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background This study sought to determine whether cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS, formerly sluggish cognitive tempo) has different external correlates relative to ADHD-inattentive presentation (INP), ADHD-hyperactive/impulsive presentation (HIP), and ADHD-combined presentation (CP). Methods Parents of a nationally representative sample of 5,525 Spanish youth (ages: 5?16, 56.1% boys) completed measures of CDS, ADHD-inattention (IN), and ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI) and other measures. Scores greater/less than the top 5% on CDS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI were used to create control (n?=?5,013, 90.73%), CDS-only (n?=?131, 2.37%), ADHD-INP-only (n?=?83, 1.50%), ADHD-HIP-only (n?=?113, 2.05%), ADHD-CP-only (n?=?48, 0.97%), CDS?+?ADHD-INP (n?=?44, 0.80%), CDS?+?ADHD-HIP (n?=?25, 0.45%), and CDS?+?ADHD-CP (n?=?68, 1.23%) groups. Results Forty-nine percent of youth with clinically elevated CDS did not qualify for any ADHD presentation, whereas 64% of youth with clinically elevated ADHD did not qualify for CDS. The CDS-only group was higher than the ADHD-INP-only, ADHD-HIP-only, and ADHD-CP-only groups on anxiety, depression, somatization, daytime sleep-related impairment, nighttime sleep disturbance, and peer withdrawal, whereas the CDS-only and ADHD-INP-only groups did not differ on ODD (ADHD-HIP-only and ADHD-CP-only higher) and academic impairment (ADHD-CP-only higher than CDS-only and ADHD-HIP-only lower than CDS-only). The CDS-only group also had higher rates of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder diagnoses than the ADHD-only group. Conclusions A distinction was found between CDS and each ADHD presentation, thus providing support for CDS as a syndrome that frequently co-occurs with yet is distinct from each ADHD presentation. |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14005 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-12 (December 2024) . - p.1601-1611
[article] Clinical distinction between cognitive disengagement syndrome and ADHD presentations in a nationally representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / G. Leonard BURNS, Auteur ; Stephen P. BECKER, Auteur ; Juan José MONTAÑO, Auteur ; Mateu SERVERA, Auteur . - p.1601-1611. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-12 (December 2024) . - p.1601-1611
| Mots-clés : |
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder cognitive disengagement syndrome comorbidity sluggish cognitive tempo transdiagnostic |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background This study sought to determine whether cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS, formerly sluggish cognitive tempo) has different external correlates relative to ADHD-inattentive presentation (INP), ADHD-hyperactive/impulsive presentation (HIP), and ADHD-combined presentation (CP). Methods Parents of a nationally representative sample of 5,525 Spanish youth (ages: 5?16, 56.1% boys) completed measures of CDS, ADHD-inattention (IN), and ADHD-hyperactivity/impulsivity (HI) and other measures. Scores greater/less than the top 5% on CDS, ADHD-IN, and ADHD-HI were used to create control (n?=?5,013, 90.73%), CDS-only (n?=?131, 2.37%), ADHD-INP-only (n?=?83, 1.50%), ADHD-HIP-only (n?=?113, 2.05%), ADHD-CP-only (n?=?48, 0.97%), CDS?+?ADHD-INP (n?=?44, 0.80%), CDS?+?ADHD-HIP (n?=?25, 0.45%), and CDS?+?ADHD-CP (n?=?68, 1.23%) groups. Results Forty-nine percent of youth with clinically elevated CDS did not qualify for any ADHD presentation, whereas 64% of youth with clinically elevated ADHD did not qualify for CDS. The CDS-only group was higher than the ADHD-INP-only, ADHD-HIP-only, and ADHD-CP-only groups on anxiety, depression, somatization, daytime sleep-related impairment, nighttime sleep disturbance, and peer withdrawal, whereas the CDS-only and ADHD-INP-only groups did not differ on ODD (ADHD-HIP-only and ADHD-CP-only higher) and academic impairment (ADHD-CP-only higher than CDS-only and ADHD-HIP-only lower than CDS-only). The CDS-only group also had higher rates of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder diagnoses than the ADHD-only group. Conclusions A distinction was found between CDS and each ADHD presentation, thus providing support for CDS as a syndrome that frequently co-occurs with yet is distinct from each ADHD presentation. |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14005 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=542 |
|
Clinical distinction between cognitive disengagement syndrome and ADHD presentations in a nationally representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65-12 (December 2024)
