
- <Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
- CRA
- Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
Horaires
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexLundi au Vendredi
Contact
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Adresse
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Annabel SONGCO |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (3)



Cognitive mechanisms predicting resilient functioning in adolescence: Evidence from the CogBIAS longitudinal study / Charlotte BOOTH in Development and Psychopathology, 34-1 (February 2022)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Cognitive mechanisms predicting resilient functioning in adolescence: Evidence from the CogBIAS longitudinal study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Charlotte BOOTH, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Sam PARSONS, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.345-353 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescence cognitive bias longitudinal resilient functioning Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Resilience is a dynamic process depicted by better than expected levels of functioning in response to significant adversity. This can be assessed statistically, by taking the residuals from a model of psychological functioning regressed onto negative life events. We report the first study to investigate multiple cognitive factors in relation to this depiction of resilient functioning. Life events, internalizing symptoms, and a range of cognitive risk and protective factors were assessed in a large sample of adolescents (N = 504) across three waves spaced 12?18 months apart. Adolescents who displayed fewer symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered more resilient. Adolescents who displayed more symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered less resilient. All cognitive factors were associated with resilient functioning to differing degrees. These included memory bias, interpretation bias, worry, rumination, self-esteem, and self-reported trait resilience. Regression models showed that memory bias was a key factor explaining unique variance in prospective resilient functioning. In a subsequent cross-lagged panel model, memory bias and resilient functioning were reinforcing mechanisms across time points, supporting cognitive models of emotional resilience. This study adds to the literature, by highlighting key cognitive mechanisms as potential intervention targets En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420000668 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-1 (February 2022) . - p.345-353[article] Cognitive mechanisms predicting resilient functioning in adolescence: Evidence from the CogBIAS longitudinal study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Charlotte BOOTH, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Sam PARSONS, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur . - p.345-353.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-1 (February 2022) . - p.345-353
Mots-clés : adolescence cognitive bias longitudinal resilient functioning Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Resilience is a dynamic process depicted by better than expected levels of functioning in response to significant adversity. This can be assessed statistically, by taking the residuals from a model of psychological functioning regressed onto negative life events. We report the first study to investigate multiple cognitive factors in relation to this depiction of resilient functioning. Life events, internalizing symptoms, and a range of cognitive risk and protective factors were assessed in a large sample of adolescents (N = 504) across three waves spaced 12?18 months apart. Adolescents who displayed fewer symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered more resilient. Adolescents who displayed more symptoms than expected, relative to negative life events, were considered less resilient. All cognitive factors were associated with resilient functioning to differing degrees. These included memory bias, interpretation bias, worry, rumination, self-esteem, and self-reported trait resilience. Regression models showed that memory bias was a key factor explaining unique variance in prospective resilient functioning. In a subsequent cross-lagged panel model, memory bias and resilient functioning were reinforcing mechanisms across time points, supporting cognitive models of emotional resilience. This study adds to the literature, by highlighting key cognitive mechanisms as potential intervention targets En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579420000668 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=474 Social determinants of mental health during a year of the COVID-19 pandemic / Amy ORBEN ; Annabel SONGCO ; Elaine FOX ; Cecile D. LADOUCEUR ; Louise MEWTON ; Michelle MOULDS ; Jennifer H. PFEIFER ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN ; Susanne SCHWEIZER in Development and Psychopathology, 35-4 (October 2023)
![]()
[article]
Titre : Social determinants of mental health during a year of the COVID-19 pandemic Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amy ORBEN, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur ; Cecile D. LADOUCEUR, Auteur ; Louise MEWTON, Auteur ; Michelle MOULDS, Auteur ; Jennifer H. PFEIFER, Auteur ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN, Auteur ; Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1701-1713 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : COVID-19 mental health physical distancing social connectedness social rejection sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Belonging is a basic human need, with social isolation signaling a threat to biological fitness. Sensitivity to ostracism varies across individuals and the lifespan, peaking in adolescence. Government-imposed restrictions upon social interactions during COVID-19 may therefore be particularly detrimental to young people and those most sensitive to ostracism. Participants (N = 2367; 89.95% female, 11-100 years) from three countries with differing levels of government restrictions (Australia, UK, and USA) were surveyed thrice at three-month intervals (May 2020 - April 2021). Young people, and those living under the tightest government restrictions, reported the worst mental health, with these inequalities in mental health remaining constant throughout the study period. Further dissection of these results revealed that young people high on social rejection sensitivity reported the most mental health problems at the final assessment. These findings help account for the greater impact of enforced social isolation on young people?s mental health, and open novel avenues for intervention. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000396 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=515
in Development and Psychopathology > 35-4 (October 2023) . - p.1701-1713[article] Social determinants of mental health during a year of the COVID-19 pandemic [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy ORBEN, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur ; Cecile D. LADOUCEUR, Auteur ; Louise MEWTON, Auteur ; Michelle MOULDS, Auteur ; Jennifer H. PFEIFER, Auteur ; Anne-Laura VAN HARMELEN, Auteur ; Susanne SCHWEIZER, Auteur . - p.1701-1713.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 35-4 (October 2023) . - p.1701-1713
Mots-clés : COVID-19 mental health physical distancing social connectedness social rejection sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Belonging is a basic human need, with social isolation signaling a threat to biological fitness. Sensitivity to ostracism varies across individuals and the lifespan, peaking in adolescence. Government-imposed restrictions upon social interactions during COVID-19 may therefore be particularly detrimental to young people and those most sensitive to ostracism. Participants (N = 2367; 89.95% female, 11-100 years) from three countries with differing levels of government restrictions (Australia, UK, and USA) were surveyed thrice at three-month intervals (May 2020 - April 2021). Young people, and those living under the tightest government restrictions, reported the worst mental health, with these inequalities in mental health remaining constant throughout the study period. Further dissection of these results revealed that young people high on social rejection sensitivity reported the most mental health problems at the final assessment. These findings help account for the greater impact of enforced social isolation on young people?s mental health, and open novel avenues for intervention. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000396 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=515 The effects of life experiences and polygenic risk for depression on the development of positive and negative cognitive biases across adolescence: The CogBIAS hypothesis / Orestis Zavlis ; Sam PARSONS ; Elaine FOX ; Charlotte BOOTH ; Annabel SONGCO ; John Paul Vincent in Development and Psychopathology, 37-1 (February 2025)
![]()
[article]
Titre : The effects of life experiences and polygenic risk for depression on the development of positive and negative cognitive biases across adolescence: The CogBIAS hypothesis : Development and Psychopathology Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Orestis Zavlis, Auteur ; Sam PARSONS, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur ; Charlotte BOOTH, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; John Paul Vincent, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.361-370 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Adolescence cognitive biases life experiences polygenic risk scores psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Cognitive Bias (CogBIAS) hypothesis proposes that cognitive biases develop as a function of environmental influences (which determine the valence of biases) and the genetic susceptibility to those influences (which determines the potency of biases). The current study employed a longitudinal, polygenic-by-environment approach to examine the CogBIAS hypothesis. To this end, measures of life experiences and polygenic scores for depression were used to assess the development of memory and interpretation biases in a three-wave sample of adolescents (12-16 years) (N = 337). Using mixed effects modeling, three patterns were revealed. First, positive life experiences (PLEs) were found to diminish negative and enhance positive forms of memory and social interpretation biases. Second, and against expectation, negative life experiences and depression polygenic scores were not associated with any cognitive outcomes, upon adjusting for psychopathology. Finally, and most importantly, the interaction between high polygenic risk and greater PLEs was associated with a stronger positive interpretation bias for social situations. These results provide the first line of polygenic evidence in support of the CogBIAS hypothesis, but also extend this hypothesis by highlighting positive genetic and nuanced environmental influences on the development of cognitive biases across adolescence. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423001645 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=546
in Development and Psychopathology > 37-1 (February 2025) . - p.361-370[article] The effects of life experiences and polygenic risk for depression on the development of positive and negative cognitive biases across adolescence: The CogBIAS hypothesis : Development and Psychopathology [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Orestis Zavlis, Auteur ; Sam PARSONS, Auteur ; Elaine FOX, Auteur ; Charlotte BOOTH, Auteur ; Annabel SONGCO, Auteur ; John Paul Vincent, Auteur . - p.361-370.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 37-1 (February 2025) . - p.361-370
Mots-clés : Adolescence cognitive biases life experiences polygenic risk scores psychopathology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Cognitive Bias (CogBIAS) hypothesis proposes that cognitive biases develop as a function of environmental influences (which determine the valence of biases) and the genetic susceptibility to those influences (which determines the potency of biases). The current study employed a longitudinal, polygenic-by-environment approach to examine the CogBIAS hypothesis. To this end, measures of life experiences and polygenic scores for depression were used to assess the development of memory and interpretation biases in a three-wave sample of adolescents (12-16 years) (N = 337). Using mixed effects modeling, three patterns were revealed. First, positive life experiences (PLEs) were found to diminish negative and enhance positive forms of memory and social interpretation biases. Second, and against expectation, negative life experiences and depression polygenic scores were not associated with any cognitive outcomes, upon adjusting for psychopathology. Finally, and most importantly, the interaction between high polygenic risk and greater PLEs was associated with a stronger positive interpretation bias for social situations. These results provide the first line of polygenic evidence in support of the CogBIAS hypothesis, but also extend this hypothesis by highlighting positive genetic and nuanced environmental influences on the development of cognitive biases across adolescence. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579423001645 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=546