[article]
Titre : |
A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
Laura L. CORONA, Auteur ; Liliana WAGNER, Auteur ; Madison HOOPER, Auteur ; Amy WEITLAUF, Auteur ; Tori E. FOSTER, Auteur ; Jeffrey HINE, Auteur ; Alexandra MICELI, Auteur ; Amy NICHOLSON, Auteur ; Caitlin STONE, Auteur ; Alison VEHORN, Auteur ; Zachary WARREN, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.2069-2080 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Purpose: Telemedicine approaches to autism (ASD) assessment have become increasingly common, yet few validated tools exist for this purpose. This study presents results from a clinical trial investigating two approaches to tele-assessment for ASD in toddlers. Methods: 144 children (29% female) between 17 and 36 months of age (mean = 2.5 years, SD = 0.33 years) completed tele-assessment using either the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP) or an experimental remote administration of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers (STAT). All children then completed traditional in-person assessment with a blinded clinician, using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS-3), and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Both tele-assessment and in-person assessment included a clinical interview with caregivers. Results: Results indicated diagnostic agreement for 92% of participants. Children diagnosed with ASD following in-person assessment who were missed by tele-assessment (n = 8) had lower scores on tele- and in-person ASD assessment tools. Children inaccurately identified as having ASD by tele-assessment (n = 3) were younger than other children and had higher developmental and adaptive behavior scores than children accurately diagnosed with ASD by tele-assessment. Diagnostic certainty was highest for children correctly identified as having ASD via tele-assessment. Clinicians and caregivers reported satisfaction with tele-assessment procedures. Conclusion: This work provides additional support for the use of tele-assessment for identification of ASD in toddlers, with both clinicians and families reporting broad acceptability. Continued development and refinement of tele-assessment procedures is recommended to optimize this approach for the needs of varying clinicians, families, and circumstances. |
En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05908-9 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=530 |
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-6 (June 2024) . - p.2069-2080
[article] A Randomized Trial of the Accuracy of Novel Telehealth Instruments for the Assessment of Autism in Toddlers [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Laura L. CORONA, Auteur ; Liliana WAGNER, Auteur ; Madison HOOPER, Auteur ; Amy WEITLAUF, Auteur ; Tori E. FOSTER, Auteur ; Jeffrey HINE, Auteur ; Alexandra MICELI, Auteur ; Amy NICHOLSON, Auteur ; Caitlin STONE, Auteur ; Alison VEHORN, Auteur ; Zachary WARREN, Auteur . - p.2069-2080. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 54-6 (June 2024) . - p.2069-2080
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Purpose: Telemedicine approaches to autism (ASD) assessment have become increasingly common, yet few validated tools exist for this purpose. This study presents results from a clinical trial investigating two approaches to tele-assessment for ASD in toddlers. Methods: 144 children (29% female) between 17 and 36 months of age (mean = 2.5 years, SD = 0.33 years) completed tele-assessment using either the TELE-ASD-PEDS (TAP) or an experimental remote administration of the Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers (STAT). All children then completed traditional in-person assessment with a blinded clinician, using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS-3), and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2). Both tele-assessment and in-person assessment included a clinical interview with caregivers. Results: Results indicated diagnostic agreement for 92% of participants. Children diagnosed with ASD following in-person assessment who were missed by tele-assessment (n = 8) had lower scores on tele- and in-person ASD assessment tools. Children inaccurately identified as having ASD by tele-assessment (n = 3) were younger than other children and had higher developmental and adaptive behavior scores than children accurately diagnosed with ASD by tele-assessment. Diagnostic certainty was highest for children correctly identified as having ASD via tele-assessment. Clinicians and caregivers reported satisfaction with tele-assessment procedures. Conclusion: This work provides additional support for the use of tele-assessment for identification of ASD in toddlers, with both clinicians and families reporting broad acceptability. Continued development and refinement of tele-assessment procedures is recommended to optimize this approach for the needs of varying clinicians, families, and circumstances. |
En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05908-9 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=530 |
|