Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Kate TSIPLOVA |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Parent coaching intervention for children with suspected autism spectrum disorder: Cost analysis / Kate TSIPLOVA in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 93 (May 2022)
[article]
Titre : Parent coaching intervention for children with suspected autism spectrum disorder: Cost analysis Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Kate TSIPLOVA, Auteur ; Jathishinie JEGATHISAWARAN, Auteur ; Pat MIRENDA, Auteur ; Karen KALYNCHUK, Auteur ; Paola COLOZZO, Auteur ; Veronica SMITH, Auteur ; Wendy J. UNGAR, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101949 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Parent coaching Toddlers Service use Cost analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Parent coaching interventions for young children suspected of having autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have shown promise. The objectives were to measure the costs of parent coaching and the pre-diagnosis utilization of services and treatments related to autism and to compare costs between families who received parent coaching (PC) and those who received enhanced community treatment (ECT). Methods This analysis was conducted prospectively alongside a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of a PC intervention in British Columbia, Canada. Twenty-four participants were randomly assigned to the PC group and received 24 weeks of coaching support and 25 participants were assigned to the ECT group. Families in both groups also received health, education and community services. Parent-reported service utilization was collected for the 6 months prior to initiation of parent coaching and for the period coinciding with receipt of one of the two interventions. Services were costed from the public payer (i.e., provincial government) and societal perspectives; the latter included out-of-pocket family costs, parental time losses due to caregiving, and public payer costs. Results Families in the PC group used fewer services than did those in the ECT group. The estimated incremental mean cost per family over two time periods for PC compared to ECT was $2515 CAD (95% CI: ? 1302, 5071) from the public payer perspective and $6994 CAD (95% CI: ? 4395, 19,299) from the societal perspective. Conclusions The findings can be used to inform funding and policy decision-making to enhance the treatment options available for young children awaiting an ASD diagnosis. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101949 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=475
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 93 (May 2022) . - 101949[article] Parent coaching intervention for children with suspected autism spectrum disorder: Cost analysis [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Kate TSIPLOVA, Auteur ; Jathishinie JEGATHISAWARAN, Auteur ; Pat MIRENDA, Auteur ; Karen KALYNCHUK, Auteur ; Paola COLOZZO, Auteur ; Veronica SMITH, Auteur ; Wendy J. UNGAR, Auteur . - 101949.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 93 (May 2022) . - 101949
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Parent coaching Toddlers Service use Cost analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Parent coaching interventions for young children suspected of having autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have shown promise. The objectives were to measure the costs of parent coaching and the pre-diagnosis utilization of services and treatments related to autism and to compare costs between families who received parent coaching (PC) and those who received enhanced community treatment (ECT). Methods This analysis was conducted prospectively alongside a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of a PC intervention in British Columbia, Canada. Twenty-four participants were randomly assigned to the PC group and received 24 weeks of coaching support and 25 participants were assigned to the ECT group. Families in both groups also received health, education and community services. Parent-reported service utilization was collected for the 6 months prior to initiation of parent coaching and for the period coinciding with receipt of one of the two interventions. Services were costed from the public payer (i.e., provincial government) and societal perspectives; the latter included out-of-pocket family costs, parental time losses due to caregiving, and public payer costs. Results Families in the PC group used fewer services than did those in the ECT group. The estimated incremental mean cost per family over two time periods for PC compared to ECT was $2515 CAD (95% CI: ? 1302, 5071) from the public payer perspective and $6994 CAD (95% CI: ? 4395, 19,299) from the societal perspective. Conclusions The findings can be used to inform funding and policy decision-making to enhance the treatment options available for young children awaiting an ASD diagnosis. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101949 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=475