Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Samantha PERLSTEIN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Genetic versus environmental influences on callous–unemotional traits in preadolescence: The role of parenting and parental psychopathology / Samantha PERLSTEIN in Development and Psychopathology, 34-5 (December 2022)
[article]
Titre : Genetic versus environmental influences on callous–unemotional traits in preadolescence: The role of parenting and parental psychopathology Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Samantha PERLSTEIN, Auteur ; Samuel HAWES, Auteur ; Alexandra Y. VAZQUEZ, Auteur ; Ileana PACHECO-COLON, Auteur ; Sarah LEHMAN, Auteur ; Justin PARENT, Auteur ; Amy BYRD, Auteur ; Rebecca WALLER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1686-1701 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : callous–unemotional traits environment etiology genetics parenting twin study Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Children with callous “unemotional (CU) traits are at risk for severe conduct problems. While CU traits are moderately heritable, parenting also predicts risk. However, few studies have investigated whether parenting factors (e.g., acceptance, conflict, parental psychopathology) moderate the etiology of CU traits, while accounting for gene “environment correlations. To address this knowledge gap, we used data from 772 twin pairs from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study to test bivariate models that explored overlapping etiological influences on CU traits and child reports of their parenting environment. We also used gene-by-environment interaction models to test whether parenting moderated genetic versus environmental influences. There were no overlapping etiological influences on CU traits and parental acceptance, but modest genetic and non-shared environmental overlap between CU traits and family conflict. Parental acceptance and psychopathology moderated non-shared environmental influences, with stronger non-shared environmental influences on CU traits among children who experienced lower parental acceptance and greater parental psychopathology. Family conflict only moderated environmental influences when models did not covary for conduct problems. Parental acceptance and parental psychopathology may be specific environmental protective and risk factors for CU traits, whereas family conflict may represent a general environmental risk factor for both CU traits and conduct problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000888 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=491
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-5 (December 2022) . - p.1686-1701[article] Genetic versus environmental influences on callous–unemotional traits in preadolescence: The role of parenting and parental psychopathology [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Samantha PERLSTEIN, Auteur ; Samuel HAWES, Auteur ; Alexandra Y. VAZQUEZ, Auteur ; Ileana PACHECO-COLON, Auteur ; Sarah LEHMAN, Auteur ; Justin PARENT, Auteur ; Amy BYRD, Auteur ; Rebecca WALLER, Auteur . - p.1686-1701.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 34-5 (December 2022) . - p.1686-1701
Mots-clés : callous–unemotional traits environment etiology genetics parenting twin study Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Children with callous “unemotional (CU) traits are at risk for severe conduct problems. While CU traits are moderately heritable, parenting also predicts risk. However, few studies have investigated whether parenting factors (e.g., acceptance, conflict, parental psychopathology) moderate the etiology of CU traits, while accounting for gene “environment correlations. To address this knowledge gap, we used data from 772 twin pairs from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study to test bivariate models that explored overlapping etiological influences on CU traits and child reports of their parenting environment. We also used gene-by-environment interaction models to test whether parenting moderated genetic versus environmental influences. There were no overlapping etiological influences on CU traits and parental acceptance, but modest genetic and non-shared environmental overlap between CU traits and family conflict. Parental acceptance and psychopathology moderated non-shared environmental influences, with stronger non-shared environmental influences on CU traits among children who experienced lower parental acceptance and greater parental psychopathology. Family conflict only moderated environmental influences when models did not covary for conduct problems. Parental acceptance and parental psychopathology may be specific environmental protective and risk factors for CU traits, whereas family conflict may represent a general environmental risk factor for both CU traits and conduct problems. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000888 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=491 Treatment of childhood disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits: a systematic review and two multilevel meta-analyses / Samantha PERLSTEIN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-9 (September 2023)
[article]
Titre : Treatment of childhood disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits: a systematic review and two multilevel meta-analyses Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Samantha PERLSTEIN, Auteur ; Maddy FAIR, Auteur ; Emily HONG, Auteur ; Rebecca WALLER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1372-1387 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Children with callous-unemotional (CU) traits are at high lifetime risk of antisocial behavior. It is unknown if treatments for disruptive behavior disorders are as effective for children with CU traits (DBD+CU) as those without (DBD-only), nor if treatments directly reduce CU traits. Separate multilevel meta-analyses were conducted to compare treatment effects on DBD symptoms for DBD+CU versus DBD-only children and evaluate direct treatment-related reductions in CU traits, as well as to examine moderating factors for both questions. Methods We systematically searched PsycINFO, PubMed, Cochran Library (Trials), EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA PsycNet, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and uncontrolled studies evaluating child-focused, parenting-focused, pharmacological, family-focused, or multimodal treatments. Results Sixty studies with 9,405 participants were included (Mage = 10.04, SDage = 3.89?years, 25.09% female, 44.10% racial/ethnic minority). First, treatment was associated with similar reductions in DBD symptoms for DBD+CU (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.72) and DBD-only (SMD = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.38, 1.64). However, DBD+CU started (SMD = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.57, 1.80) and ended (SMD = 0.73, p<.001; 95% CI = 0.43, 1.04) treatment with more DBD symptoms. Second, although there was no overall direct effect of treatment on CU traits (SMD = .09, 95% CI = ?0.02, 0.20), there were moderating factors. Significant treatment-related reductions in CU traits were found for studies testing parenting-focused components (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.35), using parent-reported measures (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04, 0.28), rated as higher quality (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.13, 0.39), conducted outside the United States (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.32), and with less than half the sample from a racial/ethnic minority group (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.30). Conclusions DBD+CU children improve with treatment, but their greater DBD symptom severity requires specialized treatment modules that could be implemented alongside parenting programs. Conclusions are tempered by heterogeneity across studies and scant evidence from randomized controlled trials. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13774 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=512
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-9 (September 2023) . - p.1372-1387[article] Treatment of childhood disruptive behavior disorders and callous-unemotional traits: a systematic review and two multilevel meta-analyses [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Samantha PERLSTEIN, Auteur ; Maddy FAIR, Auteur ; Emily HONG, Auteur ; Rebecca WALLER, Auteur . - p.1372-1387.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-9 (September 2023) . - p.1372-1387
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Children with callous-unemotional (CU) traits are at high lifetime risk of antisocial behavior. It is unknown if treatments for disruptive behavior disorders are as effective for children with CU traits (DBD+CU) as those without (DBD-only), nor if treatments directly reduce CU traits. Separate multilevel meta-analyses were conducted to compare treatment effects on DBD symptoms for DBD+CU versus DBD-only children and evaluate direct treatment-related reductions in CU traits, as well as to examine moderating factors for both questions. Methods We systematically searched PsycINFO, PubMed, Cochran Library (Trials), EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA PsycNet, Scopus, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, and uncontrolled studies evaluating child-focused, parenting-focused, pharmacological, family-focused, or multimodal treatments. Results Sixty studies with 9,405 participants were included (Mage = 10.04, SDage = 3.89?years, 25.09% female, 44.10% racial/ethnic minority). First, treatment was associated with similar reductions in DBD symptoms for DBD+CU (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.45, 1.72) and DBD-only (SMD = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.38, 1.64). However, DBD+CU started (SMD = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.57, 1.80) and ended (SMD = 0.73, p<.001; 95% CI = 0.43, 1.04) treatment with more DBD symptoms. Second, although there was no overall direct effect of treatment on CU traits (SMD = .09, 95% CI = ?0.02, 0.20), there were moderating factors. Significant treatment-related reductions in CU traits were found for studies testing parenting-focused components (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.35), using parent-reported measures (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04, 0.28), rated as higher quality (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.13, 0.39), conducted outside the United States (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.32), and with less than half the sample from a racial/ethnic minority group (SMD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.30). Conclusions DBD+CU children improve with treatment, but their greater DBD symptom severity requires specialized treatment modules that could be implemented alongside parenting programs. Conclusions are tempered by heterogeneity across studies and scant evidence from randomized controlled trials. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13774 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=512