Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Hsroc'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children / J. B. LEBERSFELD in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51-11 (November 2021)
[article]
Titre : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : J. B. LEBERSFELD, Auteur ; M. SWANSON, Auteur ; C. D. CLESI, Auteur ; S. E. O'KELLEY, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4101-4114 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Adi-r Ados-2 Autism spectrum disorder Diagnosis Hsroc Meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from .89-.92 and .81-.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were .75 and .82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research = .85, Clinical = .72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=454
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-11 (November 2021) . - p.4101-4114[article] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / J. B. LEBERSFELD, Auteur ; M. SWANSON, Auteur ; C. D. CLESI, Auteur ; S. E. O'KELLEY, Auteur . - p.4101-4114.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 51-11 (November 2021) . - p.4101-4114
Mots-clés : Autism Spectrum Disorder/diagnosis Autistic Disorder Child Humans ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Adi-r Ados-2 Autism spectrum disorder Diagnosis Hsroc Meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from .89-.92 and .81-.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were .75 and .82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research = .85, Clinical = .72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=454 Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy / Ana B. SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49-5 (May 2019)
[article]
Titre : Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Ana B. SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, Auteur ; P. GALINDO-VILLARDON, Auteur ; A. B. NIETO-LIBRERO, Auteur ; H. MARTIN-RODERO, Auteur ; Diana L. ROBINS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1837-1852 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Hsroc M-chat Meta-analysis Screening tools Systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Great efforts focus on early detection of autism spectrum disorder, although some scientists and policy-makers have questioned early universal screening. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different screening tools. Several electronic databases were used to identify published studies. A Bayesian model was used to estimate the screening accuracy. The pooled sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), and the specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analyses to remove heterogeneity indicated sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84), and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99; SD = 0.01). Level 1 screening tools for ASD showed consistent statistically significant results and therefore are adequate to detect autism at 14-36 months. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03865-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-5 (May 2019) . - p.1837-1852[article] Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Ana B. SÁNCHEZ-GARCÍA, Auteur ; P. GALINDO-VILLARDON, Auteur ; A. B. NIETO-LIBRERO, Auteur ; H. MARTIN-RODERO, Auteur ; Diana L. ROBINS, Auteur . - p.1837-1852.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 49-5 (May 2019) . - p.1837-1852
Mots-clés : Autism Hsroc M-chat Meta-analysis Screening tools Systematic review Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Great efforts focus on early detection of autism spectrum disorder, although some scientists and policy-makers have questioned early universal screening. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the different screening tools. Several electronic databases were used to identify published studies. A Bayesian model was used to estimate the screening accuracy. The pooled sensitivity was 0.72 (95% CI 0.61-0.81), and the specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99). Subgroup analyses to remove heterogeneity indicated sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84), and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-0.99; SD = 0.01). Level 1 screening tools for ASD showed consistent statistically significant results and therefore are adequate to detect autism at 14-36 months. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03865-2 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=393