Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Prepotent response inhibition'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
The role of interstimulus interval and “Stimulus-type” in prepotent response inhibition abilities in people with ASD: A quantitative and qualitative review / Marieke W. M. KUIPER in Autism Research, 9-11 (November 2016)
[article]
Titre : The role of interstimulus interval and “Stimulus-type” in prepotent response inhibition abilities in people with ASD: A quantitative and qualitative review Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Marieke W. M. KUIPER, Auteur ; Elisabeth W. M. VERHOEVEN, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1124-1141 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorders autism prepotent response inhibition interstimulus interval cognitive control meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with prepotent response inhibition difficulties. However, the large variation between studies suggests that understudied factors, such as interstimulus interval (ISI) and “stimulus-type” (both hypothesized proxies of stressors influencing arousal), might influence the inhibitory abilities of people with ASD. Using meta-analysis, we tested whether differences in prepotent response inhibition between people with and without ASD was influenced by ISI. There was not enough variation in “stimulus-type” between the studies to include it as a moderator. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 950 people with ASD and 966 typically developing controls. Additionally, a qualitative review including studies comparing a neutral and an arousing condition in one experiment was performed to examine whether fast ISI or specific arousing stimuli directly influence prepotent response inhibition. The meta-analysis indicated that ISI was not a relevant moderator. The qualitative review showed that ISI and “stimulus-type” had the same effect for both groups. Although all studies regarding ISI indicated that fast ISI worsened performance, different types of stimuli had either a positive or a negative influence. This could suggest that distinctive stimuli might affect arousal differently. While we replicated the inhibition difficulties in people with ASD (g = .51), our results do not show strong ASD-specific effects of ISI or “stimulus-type” on inhibition. Nonetheless, ISI and “stimulus-type” do seem to influence performance. Future research focusing on potential underlying factors (e.g., baseline physiological arousal) is needed to examine why this is the case. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.1631 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=297
in Autism Research > 9-11 (November 2016) . - p.1124-1141[article] The role of interstimulus interval and “Stimulus-type” in prepotent response inhibition abilities in people with ASD: A quantitative and qualitative review [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Marieke W. M. KUIPER, Auteur ; Elisabeth W. M. VERHOEVEN, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur . - p.1124-1141.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 9-11 (November 2016) . - p.1124-1141
Mots-clés : autism spectrum disorders autism prepotent response inhibition interstimulus interval cognitive control meta-analysis Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are associated with prepotent response inhibition difficulties. However, the large variation between studies suggests that understudied factors, such as interstimulus interval (ISI) and “stimulus-type” (both hypothesized proxies of stressors influencing arousal), might influence the inhibitory abilities of people with ASD. Using meta-analysis, we tested whether differences in prepotent response inhibition between people with and without ASD was influenced by ISI. There was not enough variation in “stimulus-type” between the studies to include it as a moderator. Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined sample size of 950 people with ASD and 966 typically developing controls. Additionally, a qualitative review including studies comparing a neutral and an arousing condition in one experiment was performed to examine whether fast ISI or specific arousing stimuli directly influence prepotent response inhibition. The meta-analysis indicated that ISI was not a relevant moderator. The qualitative review showed that ISI and “stimulus-type” had the same effect for both groups. Although all studies regarding ISI indicated that fast ISI worsened performance, different types of stimuli had either a positive or a negative influence. This could suggest that distinctive stimuli might affect arousal differently. While we replicated the inhibition difficulties in people with ASD (g = .51), our results do not show strong ASD-specific effects of ISI or “stimulus-type” on inhibition. Nonetheless, ISI and “stimulus-type” do seem to influence performance. Future research focusing on potential underlying factors (e.g., baseline physiological arousal) is needed to examine why this is the case. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.1631 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=297 Inhibition in Autism: Children with Autism have Difficulty Inhibiting Irrelevant Distractors but not Prepotent Responses / Nena C. ADAMS in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42-6 (June 2012)
[article]
Titre : Inhibition in Autism: Children with Autism have Difficulty Inhibiting Irrelevant Distractors but not Prepotent Responses Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Nena C. ADAMS, Auteur ; Christopher JARROLD, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1052-1063 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Inhibition Resistance to distractor inhibition Prepotent response inhibition Children Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Resistance to distractor inhibition tasks have previously revealed impairments in children with autism. However, on the classic Stroop task and other prepotent response tasks, children with autism show intact inhibition. These data may reflect a distinction between prepotent response and resistance to distractor inhibition. The current study investigated this possibility using tasks that systematically manipulated inhibitory load. Findings showed that children with autism performed comparably to typically developing and learning disabled controls on a prepotent response inhibition stop-signal task but showed significant inhibitory impairment on a modified flanker resistence to distractor inhibition task. Although the results are clearly consistent with the suggestion that autism is associated with a specific deficit in resistance to distractor inhibition, they may in fact be related to an increased perceptual capacity in autism. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1345-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=156
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 42-6 (June 2012) . - p.1052-1063[article] Inhibition in Autism: Children with Autism have Difficulty Inhibiting Irrelevant Distractors but not Prepotent Responses [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Nena C. ADAMS, Auteur ; Christopher JARROLD, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1052-1063.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 42-6 (June 2012) . - p.1052-1063
Mots-clés : Autism Inhibition Resistance to distractor inhibition Prepotent response inhibition Children Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Resistance to distractor inhibition tasks have previously revealed impairments in children with autism. However, on the classic Stroop task and other prepotent response tasks, children with autism show intact inhibition. These data may reflect a distinction between prepotent response and resistance to distractor inhibition. The current study investigated this possibility using tasks that systematically manipulated inhibitory load. Findings showed that children with autism performed comparably to typically developing and learning disabled controls on a prepotent response inhibition stop-signal task but showed significant inhibitory impairment on a modified flanker resistence to distractor inhibition task. Although the results are clearly consistent with the suggestion that autism is associated with a specific deficit in resistance to distractor inhibition, they may in fact be related to an increased perceptual capacity in autism. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1345-3 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=156