Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
4 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Reaction time variability'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Annual Research Review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype / Sarah L. KARALUNAS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55-6 (June 2014)
[article]
Titre : Annual Research Review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Sarah L. KARALUNAS, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur ; Kerstin KONRAD, Auteur ; Stephan BENDER, Auteur ; Joel T. NIGG, Auteur Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p.685-710 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Reaction time variability intraindividual ADHD ASD trans-diagnostic phenotype biomarker Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Intraindividual variability in reaction time (RT) has received extensive discussion as an indicator of cognitive performance, a putative intermediate phenotype of many clinical disorders, and a possible trans-diagnostic phenotype that may elucidate shared risk factors for mechanisms of psychiatric illnesses. Scope and Methodology Using the examples of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD), we discuss RT variability. We first present a new meta-analysis of RT variability in ASD with and without comorbid ADHD. We then discuss potential mechanisms that may account for RT variability and statistical models that disentangle the cognitive processes affecting RTs. We then report a second meta-analysis comparing ADHD and non-ADHD children on diffusion model parameters. We consider how findings inform the search for neural correlates of RT variability. Findings Results suggest that RT variability is increased in ASD only when children with comorbid ADHD are included in the sample. Furthermore, RT variability in ADHD is explained by moderate to large increases (d = 0.63–0.99) in the ex-Gaussian parameter ? and the diffusion parameter drift rate, as well as by smaller differences (d = 0.32) in the diffusion parameter of nondecision time. The former may suggest problems in state regulation or arousal and difficulty detecting signal from noise, whereas the latter may reflect contributions from deficits in motor organization or output. The neuroimaging literature converges with this multicomponent interpretation and also highlights the role of top-down control circuits. Conclusion We underscore the importance of considering the interactions between top-down control, state regulation (e.g. arousal), and motor preparation when interpreting RT variability and conclude that decomposition of the RT signal provides superior interpretive power and suggests mechanisms convergent with those implicated using other cognitive paradigms. We conclude with specific recommendations for the field for next steps in the study of RT variability in neurodevelopmental disorders. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12217 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=234
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-6 (June 2014) . - p.685-710[article] Annual Research Review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Sarah L. KARALUNAS, Auteur ; Hilde M. GEURTS, Auteur ; Kerstin KONRAD, Auteur ; Stephan BENDER, Auteur ; Joel T. NIGG, Auteur . - 2014 . - p.685-710.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-6 (June 2014) . - p.685-710
Mots-clés : Reaction time variability intraindividual ADHD ASD trans-diagnostic phenotype biomarker Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Intraindividual variability in reaction time (RT) has received extensive discussion as an indicator of cognitive performance, a putative intermediate phenotype of many clinical disorders, and a possible trans-diagnostic phenotype that may elucidate shared risk factors for mechanisms of psychiatric illnesses. Scope and Methodology Using the examples of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD), we discuss RT variability. We first present a new meta-analysis of RT variability in ASD with and without comorbid ADHD. We then discuss potential mechanisms that may account for RT variability and statistical models that disentangle the cognitive processes affecting RTs. We then report a second meta-analysis comparing ADHD and non-ADHD children on diffusion model parameters. We consider how findings inform the search for neural correlates of RT variability. Findings Results suggest that RT variability is increased in ASD only when children with comorbid ADHD are included in the sample. Furthermore, RT variability in ADHD is explained by moderate to large increases (d = 0.63–0.99) in the ex-Gaussian parameter ? and the diffusion parameter drift rate, as well as by smaller differences (d = 0.32) in the diffusion parameter of nondecision time. The former may suggest problems in state regulation or arousal and difficulty detecting signal from noise, whereas the latter may reflect contributions from deficits in motor organization or output. The neuroimaging literature converges with this multicomponent interpretation and also highlights the role of top-down control circuits. Conclusion We underscore the importance of considering the interactions between top-down control, state regulation (e.g. arousal), and motor preparation when interpreting RT variability and conclude that decomposition of the RT signal provides superior interpretive power and suggests mechanisms convergent with those implicated using other cognitive paradigms. We conclude with specific recommendations for the field for next steps in the study of RT variability in neurodevelopmental disorders. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12217 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=234 Commentary: From noise to insight? Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders – a commentary on Karalunas et al. (2014) / Jonna KUNTSI in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55-6 (June 2014)
[article]
Titre : Commentary: From noise to insight? Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders – a commentary on Karalunas et al. (2014) Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jonna KUNTSI, Auteur Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p.711-713 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Reaction time variability autism autism spectrum disorders co-occurence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Increased reaction time variability (RTV) emerged, for many of us in the field, initially as more of an ‘irritant’: a strong correlate of ADHD in particular that persisted when our pet hypotheses on other cognitive constructs withered. But the persistence of this now widespread observation – with high RTV reported across many disorders – has led to investigators paying increasingly more attention to this initially uncool concept. Time is ripe, it seems, for listening to what the ‘noise’ in our reaction time (RT) data may tell us. It is against this background that the accompanying Annual Research Review by Karalunas and colleagues captures the current enthusiasm in trying to elucidate whether RTV reflects ‘a trans-diagnostic phenotype that is associated with shared risk for several disorders or with symptom domains that cut across several disorder categories’ or whether RTV could be ‘decomposed into distinct processes that differ among psychiatric conditions’. Focusing on two neurodevelopmental disorders, ADHD and autism spectrum disorders (ASD), Karalunas et al. performed two new meta-analyses and provide an additional review of the literature, which lead to helpful interim conclusions and open a discussion (which this Commentary preludes) on the next steps in our attempts to make sense of the RT ‘noise’. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12262 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=234
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-6 (June 2014) . - p.711-713[article] Commentary: From noise to insight? Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders – a commentary on Karalunas et al. (2014) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jonna KUNTSI, Auteur . - 2014 . - p.711-713.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 55-6 (June 2014) . - p.711-713
Mots-clés : Reaction time variability autism autism spectrum disorders co-occurence Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Increased reaction time variability (RTV) emerged, for many of us in the field, initially as more of an ‘irritant’: a strong correlate of ADHD in particular that persisted when our pet hypotheses on other cognitive constructs withered. But the persistence of this now widespread observation – with high RTV reported across many disorders – has led to investigators paying increasingly more attention to this initially uncool concept. Time is ripe, it seems, for listening to what the ‘noise’ in our reaction time (RT) data may tell us. It is against this background that the accompanying Annual Research Review by Karalunas and colleagues captures the current enthusiasm in trying to elucidate whether RTV reflects ‘a trans-diagnostic phenotype that is associated with shared risk for several disorders or with symptom domains that cut across several disorder categories’ or whether RTV could be ‘decomposed into distinct processes that differ among psychiatric conditions’. Focusing on two neurodevelopmental disorders, ADHD and autism spectrum disorders (ASD), Karalunas et al. performed two new meta-analyses and provide an additional review of the literature, which lead to helpful interim conclusions and open a discussion (which this Commentary preludes) on the next steps in our attempts to make sense of the RT ‘noise’. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12262 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=234 Is reaction time variability in ADHD mainly at low frequencies? / Sarah L. KARALUNAS in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-5 (May 2013)
[article]
Titre : Is reaction time variability in ADHD mainly at low frequencies? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Sarah L. KARALUNAS, Auteur ; Cynthia L. HUANG-POLLOCK, Auteur ; Joel T. NIGG, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.536-544 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : ADHD intraindividual variability reaction time variability default network Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Intraindividual variability in reaction times (RT variability) has garnered increasing interest as an indicator of cognitive and neurobiological dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recent theory and research has emphasized specific low-frequency patterns of RT variability. However, whether group differences are specific to low frequencies is not well examined. Method: Two studies are presented. The first is a quantitative review of seven previously published studies that have examined patterns of RT variability in ADHD. The second provides new data from a substantially larger sample of children than in prior studies (NControl = 42; NADHD = 123). The children completed a choice RT task as part of a traditional go/stop task. Fast-Fourier transform analyses were applied to assess patterns of variability. Results: Quantitative review of previous studies indicated that children with ADHD demonstrate more low-frequency variability than non-ADHD controls (Hedge’s g = .39; 95% CI: .16–.62), but an equivalent excess variability in a faster frequency comparison band (g = .36; 95% CI: .03–.69), with a trivial and nonsignificant difference between ESs in each band. New data replicated results of the quantitative review with nearly identical effects in the low-frequency (g = .39; 95% CI: .05–.75) and faster frequency comparison bands (g = .40; 95% CI: .04–.74) and no evidence of diagnosis × frequency interaction (p = .954). Conclusions: Results suggest that theories of RT variability in ADHD that focus on low-frequency variability will need to be modified to account for the presence of variability at a broader range of frequencies. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12028 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=196
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-5 (May 2013) . - p.536-544[article] Is reaction time variability in ADHD mainly at low frequencies? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Sarah L. KARALUNAS, Auteur ; Cynthia L. HUANG-POLLOCK, Auteur ; Joel T. NIGG, Auteur . - p.536-544.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 54-5 (May 2013) . - p.536-544
Mots-clés : ADHD intraindividual variability reaction time variability default network Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Intraindividual variability in reaction times (RT variability) has garnered increasing interest as an indicator of cognitive and neurobiological dysfunction in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Recent theory and research has emphasized specific low-frequency patterns of RT variability. However, whether group differences are specific to low frequencies is not well examined. Method: Two studies are presented. The first is a quantitative review of seven previously published studies that have examined patterns of RT variability in ADHD. The second provides new data from a substantially larger sample of children than in prior studies (NControl = 42; NADHD = 123). The children completed a choice RT task as part of a traditional go/stop task. Fast-Fourier transform analyses were applied to assess patterns of variability. Results: Quantitative review of previous studies indicated that children with ADHD demonstrate more low-frequency variability than non-ADHD controls (Hedge’s g = .39; 95% CI: .16–.62), but an equivalent excess variability in a faster frequency comparison band (g = .36; 95% CI: .03–.69), with a trivial and nonsignificant difference between ESs in each band. New data replicated results of the quantitative review with nearly identical effects in the low-frequency (g = .39; 95% CI: .05–.75) and faster frequency comparison bands (g = .40; 95% CI: .04–.74) and no evidence of diagnosis × frequency interaction (p = .954). Conclusions: Results suggest that theories of RT variability in ADHD that focus on low-frequency variability will need to be modified to account for the presence of variability at a broader range of frequencies. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12028 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=196 Response time variability under slow and fast-incentive conditions in children with ASD, ADHD and ASD+ADHD / Charlotte TYE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57-12 (December 2016)
[article]
Titre : Response time variability under slow and fast-incentive conditions in children with ASD, ADHD and ASD+ADHD Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Charlotte TYE, Auteur ; Katherine A. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Simon P. KELLY, Auteur ; Philip ASHERSON, Auteur ; Jonna KUNTSI, Auteur ; Karen L. ASHWOOD, Auteur ; Bahare AZADI, Auteur ; Patrick BOLTON, Auteur ; Gráinne MCLOUGHLIN, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1414-1423 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder attention deficit hyperactivity disorder cognition comorbidity reaction time variability Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show significant behavioural and genetic overlap. Both ADHD and ASD are characterised by poor performance on a range of cognitive tasks. In particular, increased response time variability (RTV) is a promising indicator of risk for both ADHD and ASD. However, it is not clear whether different indices of RTV and changes to RTV according to task conditions are able to discriminate between the two disorders. Methods Children with ASD (n = 19), ADHD (n = 18), ASD + ADHD (n = 29) and typically developing controls (TDC; n = 26) performed a four-choice RT task with slow-baseline and fast-incentive conditions. Performance was characterised by mean RT (MRT), standard deviation of RT (SD-RT), coefficient of variation (CV) and ex-Gaussian distribution measures of Mu, Sigma and Tau. Results In the slow-baseline condition, categorical diagnoses and trait measures converged to indicate that children with ADHD-only and ASD + ADHD demonstrated increased MRT, SD-RT, CV and Tau compared to TDC and ASD-only. Importantly, greater improvement in MRT, SD-RT and Tau was demonstrated in ADHD and ASD + ADHD from slow-baseline to fast-incentive conditions compared to TDC and ASD-only. Conclusions Slower and more variable RTs are markers of ADHD compared to ASD and typically developing controls during slow and less rewarding conditions. Energetic factors and rewards improve task performance to a greater extent in children with ADHD compared to children with ASD. These findings suggest that RTV can be distinguished in ASD, ADHD and ASD + ADHD based on the indices of variability used and the conditions in which they are elicited. Further work identifying neural processes underlying increased RTV is warranted, in order to elucidate disorder-specific and disorder-convergent aetiological pathways. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12608 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=297
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-12 (December 2016) . - p.1414-1423[article] Response time variability under slow and fast-incentive conditions in children with ASD, ADHD and ASD+ADHD [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Charlotte TYE, Auteur ; Katherine A. JOHNSON, Auteur ; Simon P. KELLY, Auteur ; Philip ASHERSON, Auteur ; Jonna KUNTSI, Auteur ; Karen L. ASHWOOD, Auteur ; Bahare AZADI, Auteur ; Patrick BOLTON, Auteur ; Gráinne MCLOUGHLIN, Auteur . - p.1414-1423.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 57-12 (December 2016) . - p.1414-1423
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder attention deficit hyperactivity disorder cognition comorbidity reaction time variability Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show significant behavioural and genetic overlap. Both ADHD and ASD are characterised by poor performance on a range of cognitive tasks. In particular, increased response time variability (RTV) is a promising indicator of risk for both ADHD and ASD. However, it is not clear whether different indices of RTV and changes to RTV according to task conditions are able to discriminate between the two disorders. Methods Children with ASD (n = 19), ADHD (n = 18), ASD + ADHD (n = 29) and typically developing controls (TDC; n = 26) performed a four-choice RT task with slow-baseline and fast-incentive conditions. Performance was characterised by mean RT (MRT), standard deviation of RT (SD-RT), coefficient of variation (CV) and ex-Gaussian distribution measures of Mu, Sigma and Tau. Results In the slow-baseline condition, categorical diagnoses and trait measures converged to indicate that children with ADHD-only and ASD + ADHD demonstrated increased MRT, SD-RT, CV and Tau compared to TDC and ASD-only. Importantly, greater improvement in MRT, SD-RT and Tau was demonstrated in ADHD and ASD + ADHD from slow-baseline to fast-incentive conditions compared to TDC and ASD-only. Conclusions Slower and more variable RTs are markers of ADHD compared to ASD and typically developing controls during slow and less rewarding conditions. Energetic factors and rewards improve task performance to a greater extent in children with ADHD compared to children with ASD. These findings suggest that RTV can be distinguished in ASD, ADHD and ASD + ADHD based on the indices of variability used and the conditions in which they are elicited. Further work identifying neural processes underlying increased RTV is warranted, in order to elucidate disorder-specific and disorder-convergent aetiological pathways. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12608 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=297