8 recherche sur le mot-clé 'diathesis-stress'

Considering heterogeneity within negative emotionality can inform the distinction between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility: Children?s early anger and fear as moderators of effects of parental socialization on antisocial conduct / Grazyna KOCHANSKA in Development and Psychopathology, 37-4 (October 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 37-4 (October 2025) . - p.2138-2150 Titre : Considering heterogeneity within negative emotionality can inform the distinction between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility: Children?s early anger and fear as moderators of effects of parental socialization on antisocial conduct Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Grazyna KOCHANSKA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.2138-2150 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Anger  diathesis-stress  differential susceptibility  disregard for rules  fear Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The importance of interactions between child temperament and parenting has been accepted ever since Thomas and Chess (1977) proposed their "goodness-of-fit" construct, but over the last three decades, pertinent research has grown exponentially. Researchers examining child characteristics that can moderate the effects of socialization have tested increasingly complex, nuanced, and sophisticated models, largely inspired by the highly influential frameworks of child plasticity or differential susceptibility (Belsky & Pluess, 2009). Yet, multiple questions remain unsettled. We addressed four such questions as applied to predicting children s observed disregard for rules at age 4.5 in a study of 200 community families from the US Midwest. (a) We examined children s observed negative emotionality at 16 months, most commonly seen as a plasticity "trait," but separating anger and fear proneness, which may differently moderate effects of socialization. (b) We examined two separate aspects of observed parental socialization at age 3, mutually responsive orientation and power assertion. (c) We distinguished analytically diathesis-stress from differential susceptibility. (d) We examined all effects in mother- and father-child relationships. We supported both diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility, depending on the facet of negative emotionality, the aspect of socialization considered, and parental gender, highlighting the nuanced nature of the processes involved. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001731 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=567 [article] Considering heterogeneity within negative emotionality can inform the distinction between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility: Children?s early anger and fear as moderators of effects of parental socialization on antisocial conduct [texte imprimé] / Grazyna KOCHANSKA, Auteur . - p.2138-2150. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 37-4 (October 2025) . - p.2138-2150 Mots-clés : Anger  diathesis-stress  differential susceptibility  disregard for rules  fear Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The importance of interactions between child temperament and parenting has been accepted ever since Thomas and Chess (1977) proposed their "goodness-of-fit" construct, but over the last three decades, pertinent research has grown exponentially. Researchers examining child characteristics that can moderate the effects of socialization have tested increasingly complex, nuanced, and sophisticated models, largely inspired by the highly influential frameworks of child plasticity or differential susceptibility (Belsky & Pluess, 2009). Yet, multiple questions remain unsettled. We addressed four such questions as applied to predicting children s observed disregard for rules at age 4.5 in a study of 200 community families from the US Midwest. (a) We examined children s observed negative emotionality at 16 months, most commonly seen as a plasticity "trait," but separating anger and fear proneness, which may differently moderate effects of socialization. (b) We examined two separate aspects of observed parental socialization at age 3, mutually responsive orientation and power assertion. (c) We distinguished analytically diathesis-stress from differential susceptibility. (d) We examined all effects in mother- and father-child relationships. We supported both diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility, depending on the facet of negative emotionality, the aspect of socialization considered, and parental gender, highlighting the nuanced nature of the processes involved. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424001731 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=567

Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model / Alexia JOLICOEUR-MARTINEAU in Development and Psychopathology, 32-1 (February 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.73-83 Titre : Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alexia JOLICOEUR-MARTINEAU, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Eszter SZEKELY, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Celia M.T. GREENWOOD, Auteur ; Ashley WAZANA, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.73-83 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : diathesis-stress  differential-susceptibility  gene-by-environment interaction  regions of significance  vantage sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Currently, two main approaches exist to distinguish differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress and vantage sensitivity in Genotype x Environment interaction (G x E) research: regions of significance (RoS) and competitive-confirmatory approaches. Each is limited by its single-gene/single-environment foci given that most phenotypes are the product of multiple interacting genetic and environmental factors. We thus addressed these two concerns in a recently developed R package (LEGIT) for constructing G x E interaction models with latent genetic and environmental scores using alternating optimization. Herein we test, by means of computer simulation, diverse G x E models in the context of both single and multiple genes and environments. Results indicate that the RoS and competitive-confirmatory approaches were highly accurate when the sample size was large, whereas the latter performed better in small samples and for small effect sizes. The competitive-confirmatory approach generally had good accuracy (a) when effect size was moderate and N >/= 500 and (b) when effect size was large and N >/= 250, whereas RoS performed poorly. Computational tools to determine the type of G x E of multiple genes and environments are provided as extensions in our LEGIT R package. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001438 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415 [article] Distinguishing differential susceptibility, diathesis-stress, and vantage sensitivity: Beyond the single gene and environment model [texte imprimé] / Alexia JOLICOEUR-MARTINEAU, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Eszter SZEKELY, Auteur ; Keith F. WIDAMAN, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Celia M.T. GREENWOOD, Auteur ; Ashley WAZANA, Auteur . - p.73-83. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.73-83 Mots-clés : diathesis-stress  differential-susceptibility  gene-by-environment interaction  regions of significance  vantage sensitivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Currently, two main approaches exist to distinguish differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress and vantage sensitivity in Genotype x Environment interaction (G x E) research: regions of significance (RoS) and competitive-confirmatory approaches. Each is limited by its single-gene/single-environment foci given that most phenotypes are the product of multiple interacting genetic and environmental factors. We thus addressed these two concerns in a recently developed R package (LEGIT) for constructing G x E interaction models with latent genetic and environmental scores using alternating optimization. Herein we test, by means of computer simulation, diverse G x E models in the context of both single and multiple genes and environments. Results indicate that the RoS and competitive-confirmatory approaches were highly accurate when the sample size was large, whereas the latter performed better in small samples and for small effect sizes. The competitive-confirmatory approach generally had good accuracy (a) when effect size was moderate and N >/= 500 and (b) when effect size was large and N >/= 250, whereas RoS performed poorly. Computational tools to determine the type of G x E of multiple genes and environments are provided as extensions in our LEGIT R package. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001438 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415

Parenting x Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? / Camille DEANE in Development and Psychopathology, 32-1 (February 2020)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.139-150 Titre : Parenting x Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Camille DEANE, Auteur ; Nandita VIJAYAKUMAR, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Julian G. SIMMONS, Auteur ; Chad A. BOUSMAN, Auteur ; Christos PANTELIS, Auteur ; Sarah WHITTLE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.139-150 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : brain development  depression  diathesis-stress  differential susceptibility  well-being Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : It is unclear how individual differences in parenting and brain development interact to influence adolescent mental health outcomes. This study examined interactions between structural brain development and observed maternal parenting behavior in the prediction of adolescent depressive symptoms and psychological well-being. Whether findings supported diathesis-stress or differential susceptibility frameworks was tested. Participants completed observed interactions with their mothers during early adolescence (age 13), and the frequency of positive and aggressive maternal behavior were coded. Adolescents also completed structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at three time points: mean ages 13, 17, and 19. Regression models analyzed interactions between maternal behavior and longitudinal brain development in the prediction of late adolescent (age 19) outcomes. Indices designed to distinguish between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility effects were employed. Results supported differential susceptibility: less thinning of frontal regions was associated with higher well-being in the context of low levels of aggressive maternal behavior, and lower well-being in the context of high levels of aggressive maternal behavior. Findings suggest that reduced frontal cortical thinning during adolescence may underlie increased sensitivity to maternal aggressive behavior for better and worse and highlight the importance of investigating biological vulnerability versus susceptibility. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001475 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415 [article] Parenting x Brain Development interactions as predictors of adolescent depressive symptoms and well-being: Differential susceptibility or diathesis-stress? [texte imprimé] / Camille DEANE, Auteur ; Nandita VIJAYAKUMAR, Auteur ; Nicholas B. ALLEN, Auteur ; Orli SCHWARTZ, Auteur ; Julian G. SIMMONS, Auteur ; Chad A. BOUSMAN, Auteur ; Christos PANTELIS, Auteur ; Sarah WHITTLE, Auteur . - p.139-150. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 32-1 (February 2020) . - p.139-150 Mots-clés : brain development  depression  diathesis-stress  differential susceptibility  well-being Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : It is unclear how individual differences in parenting and brain development interact to influence adolescent mental health outcomes. This study examined interactions between structural brain development and observed maternal parenting behavior in the prediction of adolescent depressive symptoms and psychological well-being. Whether findings supported diathesis-stress or differential susceptibility frameworks was tested. Participants completed observed interactions with their mothers during early adolescence (age 13), and the frequency of positive and aggressive maternal behavior were coded. Adolescents also completed structural magnetic resonance imaging scans at three time points: mean ages 13, 17, and 19. Regression models analyzed interactions between maternal behavior and longitudinal brain development in the prediction of late adolescent (age 19) outcomes. Indices designed to distinguish between diathesis-stress and differential susceptibility effects were employed. Results supported differential susceptibility: less thinning of frontal regions was associated with higher well-being in the context of low levels of aggressive maternal behavior, and lower well-being in the context of high levels of aggressive maternal behavior. Findings suggest that reduced frontal cortical thinning during adolescence may underlie increased sensitivity to maternal aggressive behavior for better and worse and highlight the importance of investigating biological vulnerability versus susceptibility. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418001475 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=415

The double jeopardy of low family income and negative emotionality: The family stress model revisited / Gülbin ÅžENGÃœL-Ä°NAL in Development and Psychopathology, 37-2 (May 2025)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 37-2 (May 2025) . - p.615-632 Titre : The double jeopardy of low family income and negative emotionality: The family stress model revisited Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Gülbin ÅžENGÃœL-Ä°NAL, Auteur ; Nicolai T. BORGEN, Auteur ; Eric DEARING, Auteur ; Henrik Daae ZACHRISSON, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.615-632 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : compounding stress  diathesis-stress  double jeopardy  family stress model  negative emotionality Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The family stress model has, for decades, guided empirical work linking poverty with increased risk of child social-emotional dysfunction. The present study extends this line of work by examining whether child negative emotionality moderates associations between family income, family stress (maternal distress, parental locus of control, and relationship dissatisfaction), and later externalizing and internalizing behavior problems. In a longitudinal population-based sample (n ~ 80,000) of Norwegian children followed from birth through age five (The Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study; MoBa), we examined whether high (vs. moderate or low) negative emotionality families would display: (a) compounding stress (i.e., particularly strong associations between low family income and family stress), (b) diathesis-stress (i.e., particularly strong associations between family stress and behavior problems), or (c) double jeopardy (i.e., both compounding stress and diathesis-stress moderating effects). Negative emotionality significantly moderated the association between family income and behavior problems in a manner most consistent with double jeopardy. As a result, compared with children with moderate/low negative emotionality, the family income-behavior problems association was two to three times larger for those with higher negative emotionality. These findings underscore the active role children may play in family processes that link low family income with behavior problems. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000373 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=552 [article] The double jeopardy of low family income and negative emotionality: The family stress model revisited [texte imprimé] / Gülbin ÅžENGÃœL-Ä°NAL, Auteur ; Nicolai T. BORGEN, Auteur ; Eric DEARING, Auteur ; Henrik Daae ZACHRISSON, Auteur . - p.615-632. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 37-2 (May 2025) . - p.615-632 Mots-clés : compounding stress  diathesis-stress  double jeopardy  family stress model  negative emotionality Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The family stress model has, for decades, guided empirical work linking poverty with increased risk of child social-emotional dysfunction. The present study extends this line of work by examining whether child negative emotionality moderates associations between family income, family stress (maternal distress, parental locus of control, and relationship dissatisfaction), and later externalizing and internalizing behavior problems. In a longitudinal population-based sample (n ~ 80,000) of Norwegian children followed from birth through age five (The Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study; MoBa), we examined whether high (vs. moderate or low) negative emotionality families would display: (a) compounding stress (i.e., particularly strong associations between low family income and family stress), (b) diathesis-stress (i.e., particularly strong associations between family stress and behavior problems), or (c) double jeopardy (i.e., both compounding stress and diathesis-stress moderating effects). Negative emotionality significantly moderated the association between family income and behavior problems in a manner most consistent with double jeopardy. As a result, compared with children with moderate/low negative emotionality, the family income-behavior problems association was two to three times larger for those with higher negative emotionality. These findings underscore the active role children may play in family processes that link low family income with behavior problems. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579424000373 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=552

A Bayesian approach for exploring person?*?environment interaction within the environmental sensitivity meta-framework / Francesca LIONETTI in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65-11 (November 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-11 (November 2024) . - p.1486-1500 Titre : A Bayesian approach for exploring person?*?environment interaction within the environmental sensitivity meta-framework Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Francesca LIONETTI, Auteur ; Antonio CALCAGNÃŒ, Auteur ; Giulio D'URSO, Auteur ; Maria SPINELLI, Auteur ; Mirco FASOLO, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Massimiliano PASTORE, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1486-1500 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Differential susceptibility  diathesis-stress  vantage sensitivity  Bayesian approach  MCMC estimates Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background For investigating the individual?environment interplay and individual differences in response to environmental exposures as captured by models of environmental sensitivity including Diathesis-stress, Differential Susceptibility, and Vantage Sensitivity, over the last few years, a series of statistical guidelines have been proposed. However, available solutions suffer of computational problems especially relevant when sample size is not sufficiently large, a common condition in observational and clinical studies. Method In the current contribution, we propose a Bayesian solution for estimating interaction parameters via Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC), adapting Widaman et al. (Psychological Methods, 17, 2012, 615) Nonlinear Least Squares (NLS) approach. Results Findings from an applied exemplification and a simulation study showed that with relatively big samples both MCMC and NLS estimates converged on the same results. Conversely, MCMC clearly outperformed NLS, resolving estimation problems and providing more accurate estimates, particularly with small samples and greater residual variance. Conclusions As the body of research exploring the interplay between individual and environmental variables grows, enabling predictions regarding the form of interaction and the extent of effects, the Bayesian approach could emerge as a feasible and readily applicable solution to numerous computational challenges inherent in existing frequentist methods. This approach holds promise for enhancing the trustworthiness of research outcomes, thereby impacting clinical and applied understanding. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14000 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=537 [article] A Bayesian approach for exploring person?*?environment interaction within the environmental sensitivity meta-framework [texte imprimé] / Francesca LIONETTI, Auteur ; Antonio CALCAGNÃŒ, Auteur ; Giulio D'URSO, Auteur ; Maria SPINELLI, Auteur ; Mirco FASOLO, Auteur ; Michael PLUESS, Auteur ; Massimiliano PASTORE, Auteur . - p.1486-1500. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 65-11 (November 2024) . - p.1486-1500 Mots-clés : Differential susceptibility  diathesis-stress  vantage sensitivity  Bayesian approach  MCMC estimates Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background For investigating the individual?environment interplay and individual differences in response to environmental exposures as captured by models of environmental sensitivity including Diathesis-stress, Differential Susceptibility, and Vantage Sensitivity, over the last few years, a series of statistical guidelines have been proposed. However, available solutions suffer of computational problems especially relevant when sample size is not sufficiently large, a common condition in observational and clinical studies. Method In the current contribution, we propose a Bayesian solution for estimating interaction parameters via Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC), adapting Widaman et al. (Psychological Methods, 17, 2012, 615) Nonlinear Least Squares (NLS) approach. Results Findings from an applied exemplification and a simulation study showed that with relatively big samples both MCMC and NLS estimates converged on the same results. Conversely, MCMC clearly outperformed NLS, resolving estimation problems and providing more accurate estimates, particularly with small samples and greater residual variance. Conclusions As the body of research exploring the interplay between individual and environmental variables grows, enabling predictions regarding the form of interaction and the extent of effects, the Bayesian approach could emerge as a feasible and readily applicable solution to numerous computational challenges inherent in existing frequentist methods. This approach holds promise for enhancing the trustworthiness of research outcomes, thereby impacting clinical and applied understanding. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14000 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=537

Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene-environment interaction hypotheses / Jay BELSKY in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54-10 (October 2013)  

Permalink

Gene by environment interactions influencing reading disability and the inattentive symptom dimension of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder / Jenni ROSENBERG in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53-3 (March 2012)  

Permalink

Infant temperament, early-childhood parenting, and early-adolescent development: Testing alternative models of Parenting x Temperament interaction / Xiaoya ZHANG in Development and Psychopathology, 34-3 (August 2022)  

Permalink