1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'intensive longitudinal data'

Better, for worse, or both? Testing environmental sensitivity models with parenting at the level of individual families / Anne BÃœLOW ; Amaranta D. DE HAAN ; Jaap J.A. DENISSEN ; Loes KEIJSERS in Development and Psychopathology, 36-2 (May 2024)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 36-2 (May 2024) . - p.674-690 Titre : Better, for worse, or both? Testing environmental sensitivity models with parenting at the level of individual families Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Anne BÃœLOW, Auteur ; Amaranta D. DE HAAN, Auteur ; Jaap J.A. DENISSEN, Auteur ; Loes KEIJSERS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.674-690 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : adolescence  effect heterogeneity  environmental sensitivity  intensive longitudinal data  parenting Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : According to environmental sensitivity models, children vary in responsivity to parenting. However, different models propose different patterns, with responsivity to primarily: (1) adverse parenting (adverse sensitive); or (2) supportive parenting (vantage sensitive); or (3) to both (differentially susceptible). This preregistered study tested whether these three responsivity patterns coexist. We used intensive longitudinal data of Dutch adolescents (N = 256, Mage = 14.8, 72% female) who bi-weekly reported on adverse and supportive parenting and their psychological functioning (tmean = 17.7, tmax = 26). Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEM) indeed revealed differential parenting effects. As hypothesized, we found that all three responsivity patterns coexisted in our sample: 5% were adverse sensitive, 3% vantage sensitive, and 26% differentially susceptible. No adolescent appeared unsusceptible, however. Instead, we labeled 28% as unperceptive, because they did not perceive any changes in parenting and scored lower on trait environmental sensitivity than others. Furthermore, unexpected patterns emerged, with 37% responding contrary to parenting theories (e.g., decreased psychological functioning after more parental support). Sensitivity analyses with concurrent effects and parent-reported parenting were performed. Overall, findings indicate that theorized responsivity-to-parenting patterns might coexist in the population, and that there are other, previously undetected patterns that go beyond environmental sensitivity models. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422001493 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=528 [article] Better, for worse, or both? Testing environmental sensitivity models with parenting at the level of individual families [texte imprimé] / Anne BÃœLOW, Auteur ; Amaranta D. DE HAAN, Auteur ; Jaap J.A. DENISSEN, Auteur ; Loes KEIJSERS, Auteur . - p.674-690. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 36-2 (May 2024) . - p.674-690 Mots-clés : adolescence  effect heterogeneity  environmental sensitivity  intensive longitudinal data  parenting Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : According to environmental sensitivity models, children vary in responsivity to parenting. However, different models propose different patterns, with responsivity to primarily: (1) adverse parenting (adverse sensitive); or (2) supportive parenting (vantage sensitive); or (3) to both (differentially susceptible). This preregistered study tested whether these three responsivity patterns coexist. We used intensive longitudinal data of Dutch adolescents (N = 256, Mage = 14.8, 72% female) who bi-weekly reported on adverse and supportive parenting and their psychological functioning (tmean = 17.7, tmax = 26). Dynamic Structural Equation Models (DSEM) indeed revealed differential parenting effects. As hypothesized, we found that all three responsivity patterns coexisted in our sample: 5% were adverse sensitive, 3% vantage sensitive, and 26% differentially susceptible. No adolescent appeared unsusceptible, however. Instead, we labeled 28% as unperceptive, because they did not perceive any changes in parenting and scored lower on trait environmental sensitivity than others. Furthermore, unexpected patterns emerged, with 37% responding contrary to parenting theories (e.g., decreased psychological functioning after more parental support). Sensitivity analyses with concurrent effects and parent-reported parenting were performed. Overall, findings indicate that theorized responsivity-to-parenting patterns might coexist in the population, and that there are other, previously undetected patterns that go beyond environmental sensitivity models. En ligne : https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422001493 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=528