[article]
Titre : |
The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 1. Rationale, development, and description of a computerized children's mental health intake and outcome assessment tool |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
Charles E. CUNNINGHAM, Auteur ; Michael H. BOYLE, Auteur ; Sunjin HONG, Auteur ; Peter PETTINGILL, Auteur ; Donna BOHAYCHUK, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2009 |
Article en page(s) : |
p.416-423 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Assessment behaviour-problems interviewing factor-analysis screening reliability |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Background: This study describes the development of the Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI) – a computer-assisted telephone interview which adapts the revised Ontario Child Health Study's (OCHS-R) parent, teacher, and youth self-report scales for administration as intake screening and treatment outcome measures in children's mental health services. It focuses on the factor structure of the BCFPI's hypothesized parent-reported child mental health scales describing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), separation anxiety disorder (SAD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and major depression (MDD).
Methods: Data for the analysis come from an OCHS-R measurement study that included two groups of children and adolescents selected from the same urban area: a general population sample (n = 1,712) and a clinic-referred sample (n = 1,512); and a third sample that was enlisted in a province-wide implementation study of clinic-referred 6- to 18-year-olds (n = 56,825). We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the factor structure of the BCFPI scales in different populations and to test measurement equivalence across selected groups.
Results: Despite the strong constraints imposed on the measurement models, estimates of model fit across the three samples were comparable in magnitude and approached the cut-offs suggested for the GFI and CFI (>.9) and RMSEA (<.05). Measurement equivalence was demonstrated between the OCHS-R clinic and provincial implementation samples. Within the implementation sample, the factor structure of the BCFPI scales was equivalent for boys versus girls and for 6- to 12- versus 13- to 18-year-olds. A companion paper examines the test–retest reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and validity of these BCFPI scales when used for screening.
Conclusion: This project supports the feasibility and acceptability of a computer-assisted telephone interview for assessing emotional-behavioral problems of children and adolescents referred to children's mental health services. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01970.x |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=723 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-4 (April 2009) . - p.416-423
[article] The Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI): 1. Rationale, development, and description of a computerized children's mental health intake and outcome assessment tool [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Charles E. CUNNINGHAM, Auteur ; Michael H. BOYLE, Auteur ; Sunjin HONG, Auteur ; Peter PETTINGILL, Auteur ; Donna BOHAYCHUK, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.416-423. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-4 (April 2009) . - p.416-423
Mots-clés : |
Assessment behaviour-problems interviewing factor-analysis screening reliability |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Background: This study describes the development of the Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (BCFPI) – a computer-assisted telephone interview which adapts the revised Ontario Child Health Study's (OCHS-R) parent, teacher, and youth self-report scales for administration as intake screening and treatment outcome measures in children's mental health services. It focuses on the factor structure of the BCFPI's hypothesized parent-reported child mental health scales describing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), conduct disorder (CD), separation anxiety disorder (SAD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and major depression (MDD).
Methods: Data for the analysis come from an OCHS-R measurement study that included two groups of children and adolescents selected from the same urban area: a general population sample (n = 1,712) and a clinic-referred sample (n = 1,512); and a third sample that was enlisted in a province-wide implementation study of clinic-referred 6- to 18-year-olds (n = 56,825). We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the factor structure of the BCFPI scales in different populations and to test measurement equivalence across selected groups.
Results: Despite the strong constraints imposed on the measurement models, estimates of model fit across the three samples were comparable in magnitude and approached the cut-offs suggested for the GFI and CFI (>.9) and RMSEA (<.05). Measurement equivalence was demonstrated between the OCHS-R clinic and provincial implementation samples. Within the implementation sample, the factor structure of the BCFPI scales was equivalent for boys versus girls and for 6- to 12- versus 13- to 18-year-olds. A companion paper examines the test–retest reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and validity of these BCFPI scales when used for screening.
Conclusion: This project supports the feasibility and acceptability of a computer-assisted telephone interview for assessing emotional-behavioral problems of children and adolescents referred to children's mental health services. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01970.x |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=723 |
|