Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity / Julia DMITRIEVA in Development and Psychopathology, 24-3 (August 2012)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 24-3 (August 2012) . - p.1073-90 Titre : Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Julia DMITRIEVA, Auteur ; Kathryn C. MANAHAN, Auteur ; Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1073-90 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Isolement Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Improvements in temperance, perspective, and responsibility are a part of typical development of psychosocial maturity during adolescence. The existing literature suggests that the developmental course of psychosocial maturity is influenced by normative variations in social context, but little is known about how atypical contexts, such as incarceration, influence its development. The study investigates how the development of psychosocial maturity is affected by incarceration, using data from a 7-year longitudinal study of 1,171 adolescent males. We compared the effects of confinement in juvenile facilities with varying degrees of focus on incarceration versus rehabilitation (i.e., secure vs. residential treatment facilities) and tested whether facility quality and age at incarceration moderate the effect of incarceration on psychosocial maturity. The results indicate that incarceration in a secure setting, but not a residential treatment facility, is associated with a short-term decline in temperance and responsibility. The total amount of time incarcerated in a residential treatment facility, but not a secure setting, had a negative effect on the developmental trajectory of psychosocial maturity. Age at incarceration, but not the facility quality, moderated the effect of recent incarceration: older youths were more susceptible to short-term negative effects of recent incarceration in a secure setting, but they also benefited more than younger participants from short-term positive effects of incarceration in a residential treatment setting. Furthermore, youths who perceived their incarceration setting as unsafe evinced a decline in temperance. Future research and policy implications are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000545 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=178 [article] Arrested development: The effects of incarceration on the development of psychosocial maturity [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Julia DMITRIEVA, Auteur ; Kathryn C. MANAHAN, Auteur ; Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1073-90. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 24-3 (August 2012) . - p.1073-90 Mots-clés : Isolement Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Improvements in temperance, perspective, and responsibility are a part of typical development of psychosocial maturity during adolescence. The existing literature suggests that the developmental course of psychosocial maturity is influenced by normative variations in social context, but little is known about how atypical contexts, such as incarceration, influence its development. The study investigates how the development of psychosocial maturity is affected by incarceration, using data from a 7-year longitudinal study of 1,171 adolescent males. We compared the effects of confinement in juvenile facilities with varying degrees of focus on incarceration versus rehabilitation (i.e., secure vs. residential treatment facilities) and tested whether facility quality and age at incarceration moderate the effect of incarceration on psychosocial maturity. The results indicate that incarceration in a secure setting, but not a residential treatment facility, is associated with a short-term decline in temperance and responsibility. The total amount of time incarcerated in a residential treatment facility, but not a secure setting, had a negative effect on the developmental trajectory of psychosocial maturity. Age at incarceration, but not the facility quality, moderated the effect of recent incarceration: older youths were more susceptible to short-term negative effects of recent incarceration in a secure setting, but they also benefited more than younger participants from short-term positive effects of incarceration in a residential treatment setting. Furthermore, youths who perceived their incarceration setting as unsafe evinced a decline in temperance. Future research and policy implications are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000545 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=178

Examining Factors Associated with (In)Stability in Social Information Processing Among Urban School Children: A Latent Transition Analytic Approach / Asha GOLDWEBER in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40-5 (September-October 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 40-5 (September-October 2011) . - p.715-729 Titre : Examining Factors Associated with (In)Stability in Social Information Processing Among Urban School Children: A Latent Transition Analytic Approach Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Asha GOLDWEBER, Auteur ; Catherine P. BRADSHAW, Auteur ; Kimberly GOODMAN, Auteur ; Kathryn C. MANAHAN, Auteur ; Michele COOLEY-STRICKLAND, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.715-729 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is compelling evidence for the role of social information processing (SIP) in aggressive behavior. However, less is known about factors that influence stability versus instability in patterns of SIP over time. Latent transition analysis was used to identify SIP patterns over one year and examine how community violence exposure, aggressive behavior, and behavior regulation relate to (in)stability in SIP. Participants were 429 urban children (ages 7–13, M = 9.58; 86% African American). Latent transition analysis indicated four SIP profiles: stable low, decreasing, increasing, and stable high. Children with consistently high aggressive SIP reported the greatest community violence exposure and aggressive behavior. Compared to children who remained high on aggressive SIP, children whose aggressive SIP declined reported greater behavior regulation, suggesting that individual differences in executive function may account for stability in aggressive SIP during mid- to late childhood. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597088 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=142 [article] Examining Factors Associated with (In)Stability in Social Information Processing Among Urban School Children: A Latent Transition Analytic Approach [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Asha GOLDWEBER, Auteur ; Catherine P. BRADSHAW, Auteur ; Kimberly GOODMAN, Auteur ; Kathryn C. MANAHAN, Auteur ; Michele COOLEY-STRICKLAND, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.715-729. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 40-5 (September-October 2011) . - p.715-729 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : There is compelling evidence for the role of social information processing (SIP) in aggressive behavior. However, less is known about factors that influence stability versus instability in patterns of SIP over time. Latent transition analysis was used to identify SIP patterns over one year and examine how community violence exposure, aggressive behavior, and behavior regulation relate to (in)stability in SIP. Participants were 429 urban children (ages 7–13, M = 9.58; 86% African American). Latent transition analysis indicated four SIP profiles: stable low, decreasing, increasing, and stable high. Children with consistently high aggressive SIP reported the greatest community violence exposure and aggressive behavior. Compared to children who remained high on aggressive SIP, children whose aggressive SIP declined reported greater behavior regulation, suggesting that individual differences in executive function may account for stability in aggressive SIP during mid- to late childhood. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597088 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=142

Is adolescence-onset antisocial behavior developmentally normative? / Glenn I. ROISMAN in Development and Psychopathology, 22-2 (May 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 22-2 (May 2010) . - p.295-311 Titre : Is adolescence-onset antisocial behavior developmentally normative? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Glenn I. ROISMAN, Auteur ; Susan B. CAMPBELL, Auteur ; Kathryn C. MANAHAN, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur ; Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur ; THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT EARLY CHILD CARE RESEARCH NETWORK, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.295-311 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Largely because of the influence of Moffitt's useful distinction between adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior, it has become increasingly common to view problem behavior that makes its first appearance in adolescence as developmentally normative. This study prospectively examined the lives of individuals in the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development whose patterns of antisocial behavior varied with respect to age of onset and stability from kindergarten through age 15. Consistent with past research, early-onset, persistently deviant youth experienced more contextual adversity and evinced higher levels of intraindividual disadvantages than their peers from infancy through midadolescence. However, relative to youth who never showed significantly elevated antisocial behavior through age 15, children who showed antisocial behavior primarily in adolescence also were more disadvantaged from infancy forward, as were youth who only demonstrated significant externalizing problems in childhood. Findings generally replicated across sex and did not vary as a function of whether antisocial behavior groups were defined using T-scores normed within sex or identified using an empirically driven grouping method applied to raw data. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000076 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=102 [article] Is adolescence-onset antisocial behavior developmentally normative? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Glenn I. ROISMAN, Auteur ; Susan B. CAMPBELL, Auteur ; Kathryn C. MANAHAN, Auteur ; Laurence STEINBERG, Auteur ; Elizabeth CAUFFMAN, Auteur ; THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT EARLY CHILD CARE RESEARCH NETWORK, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.295-311. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 22-2 (May 2010) . - p.295-311 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Largely because of the influence of Moffitt's useful distinction between adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior, it has become increasingly common to view problem behavior that makes its first appearance in adolescence as developmentally normative. This study prospectively examined the lives of individuals in the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development whose patterns of antisocial behavior varied with respect to age of onset and stability from kindergarten through age 15. Consistent with past research, early-onset, persistently deviant youth experienced more contextual adversity and evinced higher levels of intraindividual disadvantages than their peers from infancy through midadolescence. However, relative to youth who never showed significantly elevated antisocial behavior through age 15, children who showed antisocial behavior primarily in adolescence also were more disadvantaged from infancy forward, as were youth who only demonstrated significant externalizing problems in childhood. Findings generally replicated across sex and did not vary as a function of whether antisocial behavior groups were defined using T-scores normed within sex or identified using an empirically driven grouping method applied to raw data. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579410000076 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=102

---

1 (1 - 3 / 3)