Understanding Barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Clinician Attitudes Toward Standardized Assessment Tools / Amanda JENSEN-DOSS in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39-6 (November-December 2010)  

Public ISBD [article]  inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 39-6 (November-December 2010) . - p.885-896 Titre : Understanding Barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Clinician Attitudes Toward Standardized Assessment Tools Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Amanda JENSEN-DOSS, Auteur ; Kristin M. HAWLEY, Auteur Année de publication : 2010 Article en page(s) : p.885-896 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In an era of evidence-based practice, why are clinicians not typically engaged in evidence-based assessment? To begin to understand this issue, a national multidisciplinary survey was conducted to examine clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. There were 1,442 child clinicians who provided opinions about the psychometric qualities of these tools, their benefit over clinical judgment alone, and their practicality. Doctoral-level clinicians and psychologists expressed more positive ratings in all three domains than master's-level clinicians and nonpsychologists, respectively, although only the disciplinary differences remained significant when predictors were examined simultaneously. All three attitude scales were predictive of standardized assessment tool use, although practical concerns were the strongest and only independent predictor of use. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517169 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=113 [article] Understanding Barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Clinician Attitudes Toward Standardized Assessment Tools [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amanda JENSEN-DOSS, Auteur ; Kristin M. HAWLEY, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.885-896. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 39-6 (November-December 2010) . - p.885-896 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : In an era of evidence-based practice, why are clinicians not typically engaged in evidence-based assessment? To begin to understand this issue, a national multidisciplinary survey was conducted to examine clinician attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. There were 1,442 child clinicians who provided opinions about the psychometric qualities of these tools, their benefit over clinical judgment alone, and their practicality. Doctoral-level clinicians and psychologists expressed more positive ratings in all three domains than master's-level clinicians and nonpsychologists, respectively, although only the disciplinary differences remained significant when predictors were examined simultaneously. All three attitude scales were predictive of standardized assessment tool use, although practical concerns were the strongest and only independent predictor of use. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.517169 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=113

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)