[article]
| Titre : |
Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Justin B. LEAF, Auteur ; Ronald LEAF, Auteur ; Jeremy A. LEAF, Auteur ; Aditt ALCALAY, Auteur ; Daniel RAVID, Auteur ; Stephanie DALE, Auteur ; Alyne KASSARDJIAN, Auteur ; Kathleen TSUJI, Auteur ; Mitchell TAUBMAN, Auteur ; John MCEACHIN, Auteur ; Misty L. OPPENHEIM-LEAF, Auteur |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.14-24 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
autism,paired-preference assessment,preference,reinforcement |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Today, the use of formal preference assessments, including paired-stimulus preference assessments, is widely utilized to help determine which items to use as reinforcers during intervention. A second way to determine potential reinforcers is to analyze multiple dimensions of a stimulus in the moment, a procedure known as in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. Although paired-stimulus preference assessments are widely used, there is no experimental evidence that extensive advance preference assessments actually produce higher rates of learning than in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. The present study compared rates of learning on a simple expressive labeling task when correct responses were reinforced with items selected based on extensive formal paired-preference assessments versus items selected by a teacher using in-the-moment analysis of reinforcer effects. The results indicated no clear difference in skill acquisition, but there were clear differences in terms of efficiency and maintenance. |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616645329 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=336 |
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-1 (March 2018) . - p.14-24
[article] Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation [texte imprimé] / Justin B. LEAF, Auteur ; Ronald LEAF, Auteur ; Jeremy A. LEAF, Auteur ; Aditt ALCALAY, Auteur ; Daniel RAVID, Auteur ; Stephanie DALE, Auteur ; Alyne KASSARDJIAN, Auteur ; Kathleen TSUJI, Auteur ; Mitchell TAUBMAN, Auteur ; John MCEACHIN, Auteur ; Misty L. OPPENHEIM-LEAF, Auteur . - p.14-24. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-1 (March 2018) . - p.14-24
| Mots-clés : |
autism,paired-preference assessment,preference,reinforcement |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Today, the use of formal preference assessments, including paired-stimulus preference assessments, is widely utilized to help determine which items to use as reinforcers during intervention. A second way to determine potential reinforcers is to analyze multiple dimensions of a stimulus in the moment, a procedure known as in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. Although paired-stimulus preference assessments are widely used, there is no experimental evidence that extensive advance preference assessments actually produce higher rates of learning than in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. The present study compared rates of learning on a simple expressive labeling task when correct responses were reinforced with items selected based on extensive formal paired-preference assessments versus items selected by a teacher using in-the-moment analysis of reinforcer effects. The results indicated no clear difference in skill acquisition, but there were clear differences in terms of efficiency and maintenance. |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616645329 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=336 |
|  |
Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33-1 (March 2018)
