[article]
Titre : |
Commentary: What to do with irritability? Do not give it a new diagnostic home-a commentary on Evans et al. (2020) |
Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
Auteurs : |
Mary A. FRISTAD, Auteur |
Article en page(s) : |
p.313-315 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Irritability is ubiquitous and therefore nonspecific. Evans and colleagues conducted an international study to test clinicians' ability to differentiate chronic irritability from four 'boundary' presentations: nonirritable oppositionality, episodic bipolar disorder irritability, depressive disorders, and normative irritability. Clinicians assigned to rate vignettes according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-Eleventh Revision (ICD-11) fared best, while those assigned to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5th Edition (DSM-5) condition had the most false positives and false negatives. Findings are consistent with a decade's worth of investigation on the utility of irritability as a diagnostic criterion. Irritability is commonly associated with both internalizing and externalizing disorders. Multiple investigations of its new 'home' within the DSM-5 categorical diagnosis of DMDD indicate a poor fit. Irritability is more useful as a specifier for other disorders, consistent with how it is utilized within the ICD-11. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13354 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.313-315
[article] Commentary: What to do with irritability? Do not give it a new diagnostic home-a commentary on Evans et al. (2020) [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Mary A. FRISTAD, Auteur . - p.313-315. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 62-3 (March 2021) . - p.313-315
Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
Résumé : |
Irritability is ubiquitous and therefore nonspecific. Evans and colleagues conducted an international study to test clinicians' ability to differentiate chronic irritability from four 'boundary' presentations: nonirritable oppositionality, episodic bipolar disorder irritability, depressive disorders, and normative irritability. Clinicians assigned to rate vignettes according to the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-Eleventh Revision (ICD-11) fared best, while those assigned to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5th Edition (DSM-5) condition had the most false positives and false negatives. Findings are consistent with a decade's worth of investigation on the utility of irritability as a diagnostic criterion. Irritability is commonly associated with both internalizing and externalizing disorders. Multiple investigations of its new 'home' within the DSM-5 categorical diagnosis of DMDD indicate a poor fit. Irritability is more useful as a specifier for other disorders, consistent with how it is utilized within the ICD-11. |
En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13354 |
Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443 |
|