An Analysis of Canadian Institute for Health Research Funding for Research on Autism Spectrum Disorder / Raywat DEONANDAN in Autism Research and Treatment, 2016 (2016)  

Public ISBD [article]  inAutism Research and Treatment > 2016 (2016) Titre : An Analysis of Canadian Institute for Health Research Funding for Research on Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Raywat DEONANDAN, Auteur ; E. Y. LIU, Auteur ; B. KOLISNYK, Auteur ; A. T. KONKLE, Auteur Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We examined patterns of Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) funding on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research. From 1999 to 2013, CIHR funded 190 ASD grants worth $48 million. Biomedical research received 43% of grants (46% of dollars), clinical research 27% (41%), health services 10% (7%), and population health research 8% (3%). The greatest number of grants was given in 2009, but 2003 saw the greatest amount. Funding is clustered in a handful of provinces and institutions, favouring biomedical research and disfavouring behavioural interventions, adaptation, and institutional response. Preference for biomedical research may be due to the detriment of clinical research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8106595 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=332 [article] An Analysis of Canadian Institute for Health Research Funding for Research on Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Raywat DEONANDAN, Auteur ; E. Y. LIU, Auteur ; B. KOLISNYK, Auteur ; A. T. KONKLE, Auteur. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Autism Research and Treatment > 2016 (2016) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We examined patterns of Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) funding on autism spectrum disorder (ASD) research. From 1999 to 2013, CIHR funded 190 ASD grants worth $48 million. Biomedical research received 43% of grants (46% of dollars), clinical research 27% (41%), health services 10% (7%), and population health research 8% (3%). The greatest number of grants was given in 2009, but 2003 saw the greatest amount. Funding is clustered in a handful of provinces and institutions, favouring biomedical research and disfavouring behavioural interventions, adaptation, and institutional response. Preference for biomedical research may be due to the detriment of clinical research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8106595 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=332

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)