[article]
| Titre : |
Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children |
| Type de document : |
Texte imprimé et/ou numérique |
| Auteurs : |
Amy CAMODECA, Auteur |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.2112-2126 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
There is limited research regarding the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition (GARS-3) despite its extensive use. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd Edition (ADOS-2) was provided to 186 clinically referred children suspected of autism ($$\overline{X }$$age=8.98; Autism [AUT] n=87; Not Autism [NOT] n=99). Mean difference analyses, Logistic Regressions, and ROC analyses were non-significant for both Autism Index scores. The author-suggested cutoff score of 70 correctly classified approximately 47% of participants, with false positive rates=82.83-87.88%. ADOS-2 correlations were significantly lower vis-à-vis the standardization sample. The Social Interaction subscale demonstrated weak, marginal results, and sensitivity/specificity could not be optimized. In its current form, the GARS-3 does not demonstrate adequate criterion validity for use in assessment of complex community samples. |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05483-5 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=501 |
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-5 (May 2023) . - p.2112-2126
[article] Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Amy CAMODECA, Auteur . - p.2112-2126. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 53-5 (May 2023) . - p.2112-2126
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
There is limited research regarding the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition (GARS-3) despite its extensive use. A comprehensive diagnostic evaluation, including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd Edition (ADOS-2) was provided to 186 clinically referred children suspected of autism ($$\overline{X }$$age=8.98; Autism [AUT] n=87; Not Autism [NOT] n=99). Mean difference analyses, Logistic Regressions, and ROC analyses were non-significant for both Autism Index scores. The author-suggested cutoff score of 70 correctly classified approximately 47% of participants, with false positive rates=82.83-87.88%. ADOS-2 correlations were significantly lower vis-à-vis the standardization sample. The Social Interaction subscale demonstrated weak, marginal results, and sensitivity/specificity could not be optimized. In its current form, the GARS-3 does not demonstrate adequate criterion validity for use in assessment of complex community samples. |
| En ligne : |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05483-5 |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=501 |
|
Diagnostic Utility of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scales-3rd Edition Parent Report in Clinically Referred Children in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53-5 (May 2023)
