[article]
| Titre : |
Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Patrick W.L. LEUNG, Auteur ; S.L. KWONG, Auteur ; T.P. HO, Auteur ; C.C. LEE, Auteur ; S.L. HONG, Auteur ; C.M. CHIU, Auteur ; W.S. LIU, Auteur ; Se-fong HUNG, Auteur ; Chun-pan TANG, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2006 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p.970–973 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Mots-clés : |
CBCL TRF YSR reliability validity Chinese |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR were understudied. This study aimed at examining their test–retest reliability and criterion validity.
Methods: Three Chinese community and clinic samples were recruited in Hong Kong. The parents, teachers, and youths respectively completed the CBCL, TRF, and YSR.
Results: The Chinese CBCL, TRF, and YSR were test–retest reliable and valid. However, there was score/case attenuation at retest. CBCL and TRF appeared to screen externalizing and ADHD problems better, while YSR screened internalizing problems better.
Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about score/case attenuation at retest while using CBCL, TRF, and YSR to chart patients' progress. They should also recognize their different strengths in screening various disorders. |
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=784 |
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-9 (September 2006) . - p.970–973
[article] Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR [texte imprimé] / Patrick W.L. LEUNG, Auteur ; S.L. KWONG, Auteur ; T.P. HO, Auteur ; C.C. LEE, Auteur ; S.L. HONG, Auteur ; C.M. CHIU, Auteur ; W.S. LIU, Auteur ; Se-fong HUNG, Auteur ; Chun-pan TANG, Auteur . - 2006 . - p.970–973. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-9 (September 2006) . - p.970–973
| Mots-clés : |
CBCL TRF YSR reliability validity Chinese |
| Index. décimale : |
PER Périodiques |
| Résumé : |
Background: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR were understudied. This study aimed at examining their test–retest reliability and criterion validity.
Methods: Three Chinese community and clinic samples were recruited in Hong Kong. The parents, teachers, and youths respectively completed the CBCL, TRF, and YSR.
Results: The Chinese CBCL, TRF, and YSR were test–retest reliable and valid. However, there was score/case attenuation at retest. CBCL and TRF appeared to screen externalizing and ADHD problems better, while YSR screened internalizing problems better.
Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about score/case attenuation at retest while using CBCL, TRF, and YSR to chart patients' progress. They should also recognize their different strengths in screening various disorders. |
| En ligne : |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x |
| Permalink : |
https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=784 |
|  |
Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47-9 (September 2006)
