Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé '*social interaction'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
[article]
Titre : Mentalising and conversation-following in autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Hsuan-Chen WU, Auteur ; Francesca BIONDO, Auteur ; Ciara O'MAHONY, Auteur ; Sarah WHITE, Auteur ; Flora THIEBAUT, Auteur ; Geraint REES, Auteur ; Paul W. BURGESS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1980-1994 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : *autism *conversation *heterogeneity *mentalising *social interaction Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Some people with autism spectrum disorders have been observed to experience difficulties with making correct inferences in conversations in social situations. However, the nature and origin of their problem is rarely investigated. This study used manipulations of video stimuli to investigate two questions. The first question was whether it is the number of people involved in social situations, that is, the source of problems in following conversations, or whether it is the increased mentalising demands required to comprehend interactions between several people. The second question asked was whether the nature and pattern of the errors that autism spectrum disorder participants show are the same as typically developing people make when they make an error. In total, 43 typically developed adults and 30 adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder were studied. We found that it was the amount of mentalising required, rather than the number of people involved, which caused problems for people with autism spectrum disorder in following conversations. Furthermore, the autism spectrum disorder participants showed a more heterogeneous pattern of errors, showing less agreement among themselves than the typically developed group as to which test items were hardest. So, fully understanding the observed behaviour consequent upon weakness in mentalising ability in people with autism spectrum disorders requires consideration of factors other than mentalising. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361320935690 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=431
in Autism > 24-8 (November 2020) . - p.1980-1994[article] Mentalising and conversation-following in autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Hsuan-Chen WU, Auteur ; Francesca BIONDO, Auteur ; Ciara O'MAHONY, Auteur ; Sarah WHITE, Auteur ; Flora THIEBAUT, Auteur ; Geraint REES, Auteur ; Paul W. BURGESS, Auteur . - p.1980-1994.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 24-8 (November 2020) . - p.1980-1994
Mots-clés : *autism *conversation *heterogeneity *mentalising *social interaction Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Some people with autism spectrum disorders have been observed to experience difficulties with making correct inferences in conversations in social situations. However, the nature and origin of their problem is rarely investigated. This study used manipulations of video stimuli to investigate two questions. The first question was whether it is the number of people involved in social situations, that is, the source of problems in following conversations, or whether it is the increased mentalising demands required to comprehend interactions between several people. The second question asked was whether the nature and pattern of the errors that autism spectrum disorder participants show are the same as typically developing people make when they make an error. In total, 43 typically developed adults and 30 adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder were studied. We found that it was the amount of mentalising required, rather than the number of people involved, which caused problems for people with autism spectrum disorder in following conversations. Furthermore, the autism spectrum disorder participants showed a more heterogeneous pattern of errors, showing less agreement among themselves than the typically developed group as to which test items were hardest. So, fully understanding the observed behaviour consequent upon weakness in mentalising ability in people with autism spectrum disorders requires consideration of factors other than mentalising. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362361320935690 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=431