Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur C.C. LEE |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR / Patrick W.L. LEUNG in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47-9 (September 2006)
[article]
Titre : Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Patrick W.L. LEUNG, Auteur ; S.L. KWONG, Auteur ; T.P. HO, Auteur ; C.C. LEE, Auteur ; S.L. HONG, Auteur ; C.M. CHIU, Auteur ; W.S. LIU, Auteur ; Se-fong HUNG, Auteur ; Chun-pan TANG, Auteur Année de publication : 2006 Article en page(s) : p.970–973 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : CBCL TRF YSR reliability validity Chinese Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR were understudied. This study aimed at examining their test–retest reliability and criterion validity.
Methods: Three Chinese community and clinic samples were recruited in Hong Kong. The parents, teachers, and youths respectively completed the CBCL, TRF, and YSR.
Results: The Chinese CBCL, TRF, and YSR were test–retest reliable and valid. However, there was score/case attenuation at retest. CBCL and TRF appeared to screen externalizing and ADHD problems better, while YSR screened internalizing problems better.
Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about score/case attenuation at retest while using CBCL, TRF, and YSR to chart patients' progress. They should also recognize their different strengths in screening various disorders.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=784
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-9 (September 2006) . - p.970–973[article] Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Patrick W.L. LEUNG, Auteur ; S.L. KWONG, Auteur ; T.P. HO, Auteur ; C.C. LEE, Auteur ; S.L. HONG, Auteur ; C.M. CHIU, Auteur ; W.S. LIU, Auteur ; Se-fong HUNG, Auteur ; Chun-pan TANG, Auteur . - 2006 . - p.970–973.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-9 (September 2006) . - p.970–973
Mots-clés : CBCL TRF YSR reliability validity Chinese Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR were understudied. This study aimed at examining their test–retest reliability and criterion validity.
Methods: Three Chinese community and clinic samples were recruited in Hong Kong. The parents, teachers, and youths respectively completed the CBCL, TRF, and YSR.
Results: The Chinese CBCL, TRF, and YSR were test–retest reliable and valid. However, there was score/case attenuation at retest. CBCL and TRF appeared to screen externalizing and ADHD problems better, while YSR screened internalizing problems better.
Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about score/case attenuation at retest while using CBCL, TRF, and YSR to chart patients' progress. They should also recognize their different strengths in screening various disorders.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=784