Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Carole J. TORGERSON |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the ‘Fast ForWord’ language intervention program / Gemma K. STRONG in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52-3 (March 2011)
[article]
Titre : A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the ‘Fast ForWord’ language intervention program Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Gemma K. STRONG, Auteur ; Carole J. TORGERSON, Auteur ; David TORGERSON, Auteur ; Charles HULME, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.224-235 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Language impairment reading difficulties auditory processing Fast ForWord Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Fast ForWord is a suite of computer-based language intervention programs designed to improve children’s reading and oral language skills. The programs are based on the hypothesis that oral language difficulties often arise from a rapid auditory temporal processing deficit that compromises the development of phonological representations.
Methods: A systematic review was designed, undertaken and reported using items from the PRISMA statement. A literature search was conducted using the terms ‘Fast ForWord’‘Fast For Word’‘Fastforword’ with no restriction on dates of publication. Following screening of (a) titles and abstracts and (b) full papers, using pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, six papers were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion (randomised controlled trial (RCT) or matched group comparison studies with baseline equivalence published in refereed journals). Data extraction and analyses were carried out on reading and language outcome measures comparing the Fast ForWord intervention groups to both active and untreated control groups.
Results: Meta-analyses indicated that there was no significant effect of Fast ForWord on any outcome measure in comparison to active or untreated control groups.
Conclusions: There is no evidence from the analysis carried out that Fast ForWord is effective as a treatment for children’s oral language or reading difficulties.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-3 (March 2011) . - p.224-235[article] A systematic meta-analytic review of evidence for the effectiveness of the ‘Fast ForWord’ language intervention program [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Gemma K. STRONG, Auteur ; Carole J. TORGERSON, Auteur ; David TORGERSON, Auteur ; Charles HULME, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.224-235.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 52-3 (March 2011) . - p.224-235
Mots-clés : Language impairment reading difficulties auditory processing Fast ForWord Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: Fast ForWord is a suite of computer-based language intervention programs designed to improve children’s reading and oral language skills. The programs are based on the hypothesis that oral language difficulties often arise from a rapid auditory temporal processing deficit that compromises the development of phonological representations.
Methods: A systematic review was designed, undertaken and reported using items from the PRISMA statement. A literature search was conducted using the terms ‘Fast ForWord’‘Fast For Word’‘Fastforword’ with no restriction on dates of publication. Following screening of (a) titles and abstracts and (b) full papers, using pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria, six papers were identified as meeting the criteria for inclusion (randomised controlled trial (RCT) or matched group comparison studies with baseline equivalence published in refereed journals). Data extraction and analyses were carried out on reading and language outcome measures comparing the Fast ForWord intervention groups to both active and untreated control groups.
Results: Meta-analyses indicated that there was no significant effect of Fast ForWord on any outcome measure in comparison to active or untreated control groups.
Conclusions: There is no evidence from the analysis carried out that Fast ForWord is effective as a treatment for children’s oral language or reading difficulties.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02329.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=118