Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Genevieve M. FENTRESS |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A comparison of two prompting procedures for teaching basic skills to children with autism / Genevieve M. FENTRESS in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6-3 (July-September 2012)
[article]
Titre : A comparison of two prompting procedures for teaching basic skills to children with autism Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Genevieve M. FENTRESS, Auteur ; Dorothea C. LERMAN, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.1083-1090 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Prompting Basic skills training Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We compared two prompting techniques that are commonly used to teach individuals with autism. In the “most-to-least” (MTL) prompting condition, the therapist initially delivered the most intrusive prompt necessary to achieve a correct response. Prompts were gradually faded across subsequent trials, while errors resulted in the provision of increasingly more intrusive prompts. Prompt fading occurred in the same manner for the “no-no-prompt” (NNP) condition; however, the therapist presented the initial instruction up to two times before delivering a prompt. Four children with autism participated. Rate of skill mastery, frequency of errors, and maintenance of skills under the two prompting conditions were compared via combined multielement and multiple baseline designs. Although the NNP method resulted in faster skill acquisition, MTL prompting was associated with fewer errors for all participants and better performance during 1- and 2-week maintenance probes for 3 of the 4 participants. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.02.006 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-3 (July-September 2012) . - p.1083-1090[article] A comparison of two prompting procedures for teaching basic skills to children with autism [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Genevieve M. FENTRESS, Auteur ; Dorothea C. LERMAN, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.1083-1090.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 6-3 (July-September 2012) . - p.1083-1090
Mots-clés : Prompting Basic skills training Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : We compared two prompting techniques that are commonly used to teach individuals with autism. In the “most-to-least” (MTL) prompting condition, the therapist initially delivered the most intrusive prompt necessary to achieve a correct response. Prompts were gradually faded across subsequent trials, while errors resulted in the provision of increasingly more intrusive prompts. Prompt fading occurred in the same manner for the “no-no-prompt” (NNP) condition; however, the therapist presented the initial instruction up to two times before delivering a prompt. Four children with autism participated. Rate of skill mastery, frequency of errors, and maintenance of skills under the two prompting conditions were compared via combined multielement and multiple baseline designs. Although the NNP method resulted in faster skill acquisition, MTL prompting was associated with fewer errors for all participants and better performance during 1- and 2-week maintenance probes for 3 of the 4 participants. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.02.006 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=154