Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Jessica L. SCHLEIDER |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Evaluating a treatment selection approach for online single-session interventions for adolescent depression / Michael C. MULLARKEY ; Jenna Y. SUNG ; Kathryn R. FOX ; Jessica L. SCHLEIDER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 64-12 (December 2023)
[article]
Titre : Evaluating a treatment selection approach for online single-session interventions for adolescent depression Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Michael C. MULLARKEY, Auteur ; Jenna Y. SUNG, Auteur ; Kathryn R. FOX, Auteur ; Jessica L. SCHLEIDER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1679-1688 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The question "what works for whom' is essential to mental health research, as matching individuals to the treatment best suited to their needs has the potential to maximize the effectiveness of existing approaches. Digitally administered single-session interventions (SSIs) are effective means of reducing depressive symptoms in adolescence, with potential for rapid, large-scale implementation. However, little is known about which SSIs work best for different adolescents. Objective We created and tested a treatment selection algorithm for use with two SSIs targeting depression in high-symptom adolescents from across the United States. Methods Using data from a large-scale RCT comparing two evidence-based SSIs (N=996; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04634903), we utilized a Personalized Advantage Index approach to create and evaluate a treatment-matching algorithm for these interventions. The two interventions were Project Personality (PP; N=482), an intervention teaching that traits and symptoms are malleable (a "growth mindset'), and the Action Brings Change Project (ABC; N=514), a behavioral activation intervention. Results Results indicated no significant difference in 3-month depression outcomes between participants assigned to their matched intervention and those assigned to their nonmatched intervention. The relationship between predicted response to intervention (RTI) and observed RTI was weak for both interventions (r=.39 for PP, r=.24 for ABC). Moreover, the correlation between a participants' predicted RTI for PP and their predicted RTI for ABC was very high (r=.79). Conclusions The utility of treatment selection approaches for SSIs targeting adolescent depression appears limited. Results suggest that both (a) predicting RTI for SSIs is relatively challenging, and (b) the factors that predict RTI for SSIs are similar regardless of the content of the intervention. Given their overall effectiveness and their low-intensity, low-cost nature, increasing youths' access to both digital SSIs may carry more public health utility than additional treatment-matching efforts. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13822 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=517
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-12 (December 2023) . - p.1679-1688[article] Evaluating a treatment selection approach for online single-session interventions for adolescent depression [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Michael C. MULLARKEY, Auteur ; Jenna Y. SUNG, Auteur ; Kathryn R. FOX, Auteur ; Jessica L. SCHLEIDER, Auteur . - p.1679-1688.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 64-12 (December 2023) . - p.1679-1688
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The question "what works for whom' is essential to mental health research, as matching individuals to the treatment best suited to their needs has the potential to maximize the effectiveness of existing approaches. Digitally administered single-session interventions (SSIs) are effective means of reducing depressive symptoms in adolescence, with potential for rapid, large-scale implementation. However, little is known about which SSIs work best for different adolescents. Objective We created and tested a treatment selection algorithm for use with two SSIs targeting depression in high-symptom adolescents from across the United States. Methods Using data from a large-scale RCT comparing two evidence-based SSIs (N=996; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04634903), we utilized a Personalized Advantage Index approach to create and evaluate a treatment-matching algorithm for these interventions. The two interventions were Project Personality (PP; N=482), an intervention teaching that traits and symptoms are malleable (a "growth mindset'), and the Action Brings Change Project (ABC; N=514), a behavioral activation intervention. Results Results indicated no significant difference in 3-month depression outcomes between participants assigned to their matched intervention and those assigned to their nonmatched intervention. The relationship between predicted response to intervention (RTI) and observed RTI was weak for both interventions (r=.39 for PP, r=.24 for ABC). Moreover, the correlation between a participants' predicted RTI for PP and their predicted RTI for ABC was very high (r=.79). Conclusions The utility of treatment selection approaches for SSIs targeting adolescent depression appears limited. Results suggest that both (a) predicting RTI for SSIs is relatively challenging, and (b) the factors that predict RTI for SSIs are similar regardless of the content of the intervention. Given their overall effectiveness and their low-intensity, low-cost nature, increasing youths' access to both digital SSIs may carry more public health utility than additional treatment-matching efforts. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13822 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=517 Family process and youth internalizing problems: A triadic model of etiology and intervention / Jessica L. SCHLEIDER in Development and Psychopathology, 29-1 (February 2017)
[article]
Titre : Family process and youth internalizing problems: A triadic model of etiology and intervention Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jessica L. SCHLEIDER, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.273-301 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : AbstractDespite major advances in the development of interventions for youth anxiety and depression, approximately 30% of youths with anxiety do not respond to cognitive behavioral treatment, and youth depression treatments yield modest symptom decreases overall. Identifying networks of modifiable risk and maintenance factors that contribute to both youth anxiety and depression (i.e., internalizing problems) may enhance and broaden treatment benefits by informing the development of mechanism-targeted interventions. A particularly powerful network is the rich array of family processes linked to internalizing problems (e.g., parenting styles, parental mental health problems, and sibling relationships). Here, we propose a new theoretical model, the triadic modelof family process, to organize theory and evidence around modifiable, transdiagnostic family factors that may contribute to youth internalizing problems. We describe the model's implications for intervention, and we propose strategies for testing the model in future research. The model provides a framework for studying associations among family processes, their relation to youth internalizing problems, and family-based strategies for strengthening prevention and treatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095457941600016x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=298
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-1 (February 2017) . - p.273-301[article] Family process and youth internalizing problems: A triadic model of etiology and intervention [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jessica L. SCHLEIDER, Auteur ; John R. WEISZ, Auteur . - p.273-301.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 29-1 (February 2017) . - p.273-301
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : AbstractDespite major advances in the development of interventions for youth anxiety and depression, approximately 30% of youths with anxiety do not respond to cognitive behavioral treatment, and youth depression treatments yield modest symptom decreases overall. Identifying networks of modifiable risk and maintenance factors that contribute to both youth anxiety and depression (i.e., internalizing problems) may enhance and broaden treatment benefits by informing the development of mechanism-targeted interventions. A particularly powerful network is the rich array of family processes linked to internalizing problems (e.g., parenting styles, parental mental health problems, and sibling relationships). Here, we propose a new theoretical model, the triadic modelof family process, to organize theory and evidence around modifiable, transdiagnostic family factors that may contribute to youth internalizing problems. We describe the model's implications for intervention, and we propose strategies for testing the model in future research. The model provides a framework for studying associations among family processes, their relation to youth internalizing problems, and family-based strategies for strengthening prevention and treatment. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s095457941600016x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=298