Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Tianlan WEI |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A meta-analysis of the social communication questionnaire: Screening for autism spectrum disorder / Steven R. CHESNUT in Autism, 21-8 (November 2017)
[article]
Titre : A meta-analysis of the social communication questionnaire: Screening for autism spectrum disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Steven R. CHESNUT, Auteur ; Tianlan WEI, Auteur ; Lucy BARNARD-BRAK, Auteur ; David M. RICHMAN, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p.920-928 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current meta-analysis examines the previous research on the utility of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a screening instrument for autism spectrum disorder. Previously published reports have highlighted the inconsistencies between Social Communication Questionnaire-screening results and formal autism spectrum disorder diagnoses. The variations in accuracy resulted in some researchers questioning the validity of the Social Communication Questionnaire. This study systematically examined the accuracy of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a function of the methodological decisions made by researchers screening for autism spectrum disorder over the last 15?years. Findings from this study suggest that the Social Communication Questionnaire is an acceptable screening instrument for autism spectrum disorder (area under the curve=0.885). Variations in methodological decisions, however, greatly influenced the accuracy of the Social Communication Questionnaire in screening for autism spectrum disorder. Of these methodological variations, using the Current instead of the Lifetime version of the Social Communication Questionnaire resulted in the largest detrimental effect (d=?3.898), followed by using the Social Communication Questionnaire with individuals younger than 4?years of age (d=?2.924) and relying upon convenience samples (d=?4.828 for clinical samples, ?2.734 for convenience samples, and ?1.422 for community samples). Directions for future research and implications for using the Social Communication Questionnaire to screen for autism spectrum disorder are discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316660065 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=320
in Autism > 21-8 (November 2017) . - p.920-928[article] A meta-analysis of the social communication questionnaire: Screening for autism spectrum disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Steven R. CHESNUT, Auteur ; Tianlan WEI, Auteur ; Lucy BARNARD-BRAK, Auteur ; David M. RICHMAN, Auteur . - 2017 . - p.920-928.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism > 21-8 (November 2017) . - p.920-928
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The current meta-analysis examines the previous research on the utility of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a screening instrument for autism spectrum disorder. Previously published reports have highlighted the inconsistencies between Social Communication Questionnaire-screening results and formal autism spectrum disorder diagnoses. The variations in accuracy resulted in some researchers questioning the validity of the Social Communication Questionnaire. This study systematically examined the accuracy of the Social Communication Questionnaire as a function of the methodological decisions made by researchers screening for autism spectrum disorder over the last 15?years. Findings from this study suggest that the Social Communication Questionnaire is an acceptable screening instrument for autism spectrum disorder (area under the curve=0.885). Variations in methodological decisions, however, greatly influenced the accuracy of the Social Communication Questionnaire in screening for autism spectrum disorder. Of these methodological variations, using the Current instead of the Lifetime version of the Social Communication Questionnaire resulted in the largest detrimental effect (d=?3.898), followed by using the Social Communication Questionnaire with individuals younger than 4?years of age (d=?2.924) and relying upon convenience samples (d=?4.828 for clinical samples, ?2.734 for convenience samples, and ?1.422 for community samples). Directions for future research and implications for using the Social Communication Questionnaire to screen for autism spectrum disorder are discussed. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316660065 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=320