Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur L. M. DIAMOND |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Incorporating epigenetic mechanisms to advance fetal programming theories / E. CONRADT in Development and Psychopathology, 30-3 (August 2018)
[article]
Titre : Incorporating epigenetic mechanisms to advance fetal programming theories Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : E. CONRADT, Auteur ; Daniel E. ADKINS, Auteur ; S. E. CROWELL, Auteur ; K. L. RABY, Auteur ; L. M. DIAMOND, Auteur ; B. ELLIS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.807-824 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Decades of fetal programming research indicates that we may be able to map the origins of many physical, psychological, and medical variations and morbidities before the birth of the child. While great strides have been made in identifying associations between prenatal insults, such as undernutrition or psychosocial stress, and negative developmental outcomes, far less is known about how adaptive responses to adversity regulate the developing phenotype to match stressful conditions. As the application of epigenetic methods to human behavior has exploded in the last decade, research has begun to shed light on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in explaining how prenatal conditions shape later susceptibilities to mental and physical health problems. In this review, we describe and attempt to integrate two dominant fetal programming models: the cumulative stress model (a disease-focused approach) and the match-mismatch model (an evolutionary-developmental approach). In conjunction with biological sensitivity to context theory, we employ these two models to generate new hypotheses regarding epigenetic mechanisms through which prenatal and postnatal experiences program child stress reactivity and, in turn, promote development of adaptive versus maladaptive phenotypic outcomes. We conclude by outlining priority questions and future directions for the fetal programming field. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418000469 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=366
in Development and Psychopathology > 30-3 (August 2018) . - p.807-824[article] Incorporating epigenetic mechanisms to advance fetal programming theories [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / E. CONRADT, Auteur ; Daniel E. ADKINS, Auteur ; S. E. CROWELL, Auteur ; K. L. RABY, Auteur ; L. M. DIAMOND, Auteur ; B. ELLIS, Auteur . - p.807-824.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Development and Psychopathology > 30-3 (August 2018) . - p.807-824
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Decades of fetal programming research indicates that we may be able to map the origins of many physical, psychological, and medical variations and morbidities before the birth of the child. While great strides have been made in identifying associations between prenatal insults, such as undernutrition or psychosocial stress, and negative developmental outcomes, far less is known about how adaptive responses to adversity regulate the developing phenotype to match stressful conditions. As the application of epigenetic methods to human behavior has exploded in the last decade, research has begun to shed light on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in explaining how prenatal conditions shape later susceptibilities to mental and physical health problems. In this review, we describe and attempt to integrate two dominant fetal programming models: the cumulative stress model (a disease-focused approach) and the match-mismatch model (an evolutionary-developmental approach). In conjunction with biological sensitivity to context theory, we employ these two models to generate new hypotheses regarding epigenetic mechanisms through which prenatal and postnatal experiences program child stress reactivity and, in turn, promote development of adaptive versus maladaptive phenotypic outcomes. We conclude by outlining priority questions and future directions for the fetal programming field. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954579418000469 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=366