Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Erinn WHITESIDE |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A systematic review of interventions for feeding-related behaviors for individuals with autism spectrum disorders / Jennifer R. LEDFORD in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 52 (August 2018)
[article]
Titre : A systematic review of interventions for feeding-related behaviors for individuals with autism spectrum disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jennifer R. LEDFORD, Auteur ; Erinn WHITESIDE, Auteur ; Katherine E. SEVERINI, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.69-80 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Feeding Mealtime problem behavior Food selectivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Feeding problems are common for individuals with ASD. Researchers have most often used single case designs, a type of design appropriate for evaluating causal relations, to assess feeding interventions. Previous reviews of effectiveness have included only peer-reviewed studies (e.g., did not include gray literature) and have not analyzed outcomes via the presence of functional relations, the primary analysis method for single case research. Method Authors reviewed peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources including studies designed to improve mealtime behaviors for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to determine participant characteristics, common intervention characteristics and components, and success rates (percentage of studies with functional relations). Results Studies often included individuals with ASD who were highly selective; common dependent variables were acceptance of food and problematic mealtime behaviors. Researchers, rather than indigenous adults, most often implemented studies in clinics, rather than typical settings. Interventions designed to improve acceptance had higher success rates (percentage of studies demonstrating a functional relation) than those targeting rumination/vomiting or problematic mealtime behavior. Conclusions Outcomes were more often positive for food acceptance and less often positive for problematic mealtime behavior. More research is needed, particularly in typical contexts with indigenous implementers and including component analyses, feasibility assessment, and social validity measurement. Feeding interventions should be selected based on identified caregiver priorities (e.g., focus on problematic mealtime behavior or food acceptance) and should include consideration of behavioral function and less restrictive interventions. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.008 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 52 (August 2018) . - p.69-80[article] A systematic review of interventions for feeding-related behaviors for individuals with autism spectrum disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jennifer R. LEDFORD, Auteur ; Erinn WHITESIDE, Auteur ; Katherine E. SEVERINI, Auteur . - p.69-80.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 52 (August 2018) . - p.69-80
Mots-clés : Feeding Mealtime problem behavior Food selectivity Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Feeding problems are common for individuals with ASD. Researchers have most often used single case designs, a type of design appropriate for evaluating causal relations, to assess feeding interventions. Previous reviews of effectiveness have included only peer-reviewed studies (e.g., did not include gray literature) and have not analyzed outcomes via the presence of functional relations, the primary analysis method for single case research. Method Authors reviewed peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources including studies designed to improve mealtime behaviors for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to determine participant characteristics, common intervention characteristics and components, and success rates (percentage of studies with functional relations). Results Studies often included individuals with ASD who were highly selective; common dependent variables were acceptance of food and problematic mealtime behaviors. Researchers, rather than indigenous adults, most often implemented studies in clinics, rather than typical settings. Interventions designed to improve acceptance had higher success rates (percentage of studies demonstrating a functional relation) than those targeting rumination/vomiting or problematic mealtime behavior. Conclusions Outcomes were more often positive for food acceptance and less often positive for problematic mealtime behavior. More research is needed, particularly in typical contexts with indigenous implementers and including component analyses, feasibility assessment, and social validity measurement. Feeding interventions should be selected based on identified caregiver priorities (e.g., focus on problematic mealtime behavior or food acceptance) and should include consideration of behavioral function and less restrictive interventions. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.008 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=368