Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Francesca G. JONES |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Alternate Assessment Formats for Progress Monitoring Students With Intellectual Disabilities and Below Average IQ: An Exploratory Study / Francesca G. JONES in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34-1 (March 2019)
[article]
Titre : Alternate Assessment Formats for Progress Monitoring Students With Intellectual Disabilities and Below Average IQ: An Exploratory Study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Francesca G. JONES, Auteur ; Diane GIFFORD, Auteur ; Paul YOVANOFF, Auteur ; Stephanie AL OTAIBA, Auteur ; Dawn LEVY, Auteur ; Jill ALLOR, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.41-51 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : As part of standards-based reforms, there is increasing emphasis on ensuring that students with moderate intellectual disabilities (ID), including students with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), learn to read. There is also converging evidence that explicit teaching of letter sounds, phonics, and sight words is effective for this population, but that students? responsiveness varies. A critical part of individualizing reading instruction for students with disabilities is the reliable assessment of progress and mastery of reading skills. However, assessment of many students with ID and students with ASD is challenging because of attention, behavioral, and communication issues related to testing situation; therefore, obtaining consistent results often proves to be a difficult task. We hypothesized that alternate assessment presentation formats, as a testing accommodation, would improve the reliability, validity, and consistency of assessment performance. In this study, three different presentation formats?word lists, flash cards, and PowerPoint presentation?were used when administering proximal, curriculum-based reading assessments to determine whether a particular format increased student engagement, reduced the need for prompts, and increased accuracy of identifying known items on the test. While statistical analyses did not support the hypothesis of a format by student effect, visual analysis of the data did suggest that the number of prompts required varied by student as a function of assessment format. Most noteworthy, assessment reliability, estimated with generalizability theory, indicated that reliability increased as a function of format by student. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618762749 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=383
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 34-1 (March 2019) . - p.41-51[article] Alternate Assessment Formats for Progress Monitoring Students With Intellectual Disabilities and Below Average IQ: An Exploratory Study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Francesca G. JONES, Auteur ; Diane GIFFORD, Auteur ; Paul YOVANOFF, Auteur ; Stephanie AL OTAIBA, Auteur ; Dawn LEVY, Auteur ; Jill ALLOR, Auteur . - p.41-51.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 34-1 (March 2019) . - p.41-51
Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : As part of standards-based reforms, there is increasing emphasis on ensuring that students with moderate intellectual disabilities (ID), including students with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), learn to read. There is also converging evidence that explicit teaching of letter sounds, phonics, and sight words is effective for this population, but that students? responsiveness varies. A critical part of individualizing reading instruction for students with disabilities is the reliable assessment of progress and mastery of reading skills. However, assessment of many students with ID and students with ASD is challenging because of attention, behavioral, and communication issues related to testing situation; therefore, obtaining consistent results often proves to be a difficult task. We hypothesized that alternate assessment presentation formats, as a testing accommodation, would improve the reliability, validity, and consistency of assessment performance. In this study, three different presentation formats?word lists, flash cards, and PowerPoint presentation?were used when administering proximal, curriculum-based reading assessments to determine whether a particular format increased student engagement, reduced the need for prompts, and increased accuracy of identifying known items on the test. While statistical analyses did not support the hypothesis of a format by student effect, visual analysis of the data did suggest that the number of prompts required varied by student as a function of assessment format. Most noteworthy, assessment reliability, estimated with generalizability theory, indicated that reliability increased as a function of format by student. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618762749 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=383