Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur L. M. ALEXANDER |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Measuring strengths and weaknesses in dimensional psychiatry / L. M. ALEXANDER in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61-1 (January 2020)
[article]
Titre : Measuring strengths and weaknesses in dimensional psychiatry Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : L. M. ALEXANDER, Auteur ; Giovanni A. SALUM, Auteur ; J. M. SWANSON, Auteur ; M. P. MILHAM, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.40-50 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Questionnaires methodology rating scales Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The Extended Strengths and Weaknesses Assessment of Normal Behavior (E-SWAN) reconceptualizes each diagnostic criterion for selected DSM-5 disorders as a behavior, which can range from high (strengths) to low (weaknesses). Initial development focused on Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety, Major Depression, and Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. METHODS: Data were collected from 523 participants (ages 6-17). Parents completed each of the four E-SWAN scales and traditional unidirectional scales addressing the same disorders. Distributional properties, Item Response Theory Analysis (IRT), and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess and compare the performance of E-SWAN and traditional scales. RESULTS: In contrast to the traditional scales, which exhibited truncated distributions, all four E-SWAN scales had symmetric distributions. IRT analyses indicate the E-SWAN subscales provided reliable information about respondents throughout the population distribution; traditional scales only provided reliable information about respondents at the high end of the distribution. Predictive value for DSM-5 diagnoses was comparable to prior scales. CONCLUSIONS: E-SWAN bidirectional scales can capture the full spectrum of the population distribution of behavior underlying DSM disorders. The additional information provided can better inform examination of inter-individual variation in population studies, as well as facilitate the identification of factors related to resiliency in clinical samples. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13104 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=413
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 61-1 (January 2020) . - p.40-50[article] Measuring strengths and weaknesses in dimensional psychiatry [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / L. M. ALEXANDER, Auteur ; Giovanni A. SALUM, Auteur ; J. M. SWANSON, Auteur ; M. P. MILHAM, Auteur . - p.40-50.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 61-1 (January 2020) . - p.40-50
Mots-clés : Questionnaires methodology rating scales Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : BACKGROUND: The Extended Strengths and Weaknesses Assessment of Normal Behavior (E-SWAN) reconceptualizes each diagnostic criterion for selected DSM-5 disorders as a behavior, which can range from high (strengths) to low (weaknesses). Initial development focused on Panic Disorder, Social Anxiety, Major Depression, and Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder. METHODS: Data were collected from 523 participants (ages 6-17). Parents completed each of the four E-SWAN scales and traditional unidirectional scales addressing the same disorders. Distributional properties, Item Response Theory Analysis (IRT), and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess and compare the performance of E-SWAN and traditional scales. RESULTS: In contrast to the traditional scales, which exhibited truncated distributions, all four E-SWAN scales had symmetric distributions. IRT analyses indicate the E-SWAN subscales provided reliable information about respondents throughout the population distribution; traditional scales only provided reliable information about respondents at the high end of the distribution. Predictive value for DSM-5 diagnoses was comparable to prior scales. CONCLUSIONS: E-SWAN bidirectional scales can capture the full spectrum of the population distribution of behavior underlying DSM disorders. The additional information provided can better inform examination of inter-individual variation in population studies, as well as facilitate the identification of factors related to resiliency in clinical samples. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13104 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=413