Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Ron POMPER |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Comparing Automatic Eye Tracking and Manual Gaze Coding Methods in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder / Courtney E. VENKER in Autism Research, 13-2 (February 2020)
[article]
Titre : Comparing Automatic Eye Tracking and Manual Gaze Coding Methods in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Courtney E. VENKER, Auteur ; Ron POMPER, Auteur ; Tristan MAHR, Auteur ; Jan EDWARDS, Auteur ; Jenny SAFFRAN, Auteur ; Susan ELLIS WEISMER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.271-283 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism children data quality eye tracking language processing methodology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Eye-gaze methods offer numerous advantages for studying cognitive processes in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but data loss may threaten the validity and generalizability of results. Some eye-gaze systems may be more vulnerable to data loss than others, but to our knowledge, this issue has not been empirically investigated. In the current study, we asked whether automatic eye-tracking and manual gaze coding produce different rates of data loss or different results in a group of 51 toddlers with ASD. Data from both systems were gathered (from the same children) simultaneously, during the same experimental sessions. As predicted, manual gaze coding produced significantly less data loss than automatic eye tracking, as indicated by the number of usable trials and the proportion of looks to the images per trial. In addition, automatic eye-tracking and manual gaze coding produced different patterns of results, suggesting that the eye-gaze system used to address a particular research question could alter a study's findings and the scientific conclusions that follow. It is our hope that the information from this and future methodological studies will help researchers to select the eye-gaze measurement system that best fits their research questions and target population, as well as help consumers of autism research to interpret the findings from studies that utilize eye-gaze methods with children with ASD. Autism Res 2020, 13: 271-283. (c) 2019 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: The current study found that automatic eye-tracking and manual gaze coding produced different rates of data loss and different overall patterns of results in young children with ASD. These findings show that the choice of eye-gaze system may impact the findings of a study-important information for both researchers and consumers of autism research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2225 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=420
in Autism Research > 13-2 (February 2020) . - p.271-283[article] Comparing Automatic Eye Tracking and Manual Gaze Coding Methods in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Courtney E. VENKER, Auteur ; Ron POMPER, Auteur ; Tristan MAHR, Auteur ; Jan EDWARDS, Auteur ; Jenny SAFFRAN, Auteur ; Susan ELLIS WEISMER, Auteur . - p.271-283.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Autism Research > 13-2 (February 2020) . - p.271-283
Mots-clés : autism children data quality eye tracking language processing methodology Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Eye-gaze methods offer numerous advantages for studying cognitive processes in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but data loss may threaten the validity and generalizability of results. Some eye-gaze systems may be more vulnerable to data loss than others, but to our knowledge, this issue has not been empirically investigated. In the current study, we asked whether automatic eye-tracking and manual gaze coding produce different rates of data loss or different results in a group of 51 toddlers with ASD. Data from both systems were gathered (from the same children) simultaneously, during the same experimental sessions. As predicted, manual gaze coding produced significantly less data loss than automatic eye tracking, as indicated by the number of usable trials and the proportion of looks to the images per trial. In addition, automatic eye-tracking and manual gaze coding produced different patterns of results, suggesting that the eye-gaze system used to address a particular research question could alter a study's findings and the scientific conclusions that follow. It is our hope that the information from this and future methodological studies will help researchers to select the eye-gaze measurement system that best fits their research questions and target population, as well as help consumers of autism research to interpret the findings from studies that utilize eye-gaze methods with children with ASD. Autism Res 2020, 13: 271-283. (c) 2019 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. LAY SUMMARY: The current study found that automatic eye-tracking and manual gaze coding produced different rates of data loss and different overall patterns of results in young children with ASD. These findings show that the choice of eye-gaze system may impact the findings of a study-important information for both researchers and consumers of autism research. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aur.2225 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=420 Use of Mutual Exclusivity and its Relationship to Language Ability in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder / Janine MATHEE-SCOTT in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 52-10 (October 2022)
[article]
Titre : Use of Mutual Exclusivity and its Relationship to Language Ability in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Janine MATHEE-SCOTT, Auteur ; Caroline LARSON, Auteur ; Courtney E. VENKER, Auteur ; Ron POMPER, Auteur ; Jan EDWARDS, Auteur ; Jenny SAFFRAN, Auteur ; Susan ELLIS WEISMER, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.4528-4539 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Language development Learning mechanisms Mutual exclusivity Novelty Referent selection Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : To efficiently learn new words, children use constraints such as mutual exclusivity (ME) to narrow the search for potential referents. The current study investigated the use of ME in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurotypical (NT) peers matched on nonverbal cognition. Thirty-two toddlers with ASD and 26 NT toddlers participated in a looking-while-listening task. Images of novel and familiar objects were presented along with a novel or familiar label. Overall, toddlers with ASD showed less efficient looking toward a novel referent when a novel label was presented compared to NT toddlers, controlling for age and familiar word knowledge. However, toddlers with ASD and higher language ability demonstrated more robust use of ME than those with lower language ability. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05321-0 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=486
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-10 (October 2022) . - p.4528-4539[article] Use of Mutual Exclusivity and its Relationship to Language Ability in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Janine MATHEE-SCOTT, Auteur ; Caroline LARSON, Auteur ; Courtney E. VENKER, Auteur ; Ron POMPER, Auteur ; Jan EDWARDS, Auteur ; Jenny SAFFRAN, Auteur ; Susan ELLIS WEISMER, Auteur . - p.4528-4539.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > 52-10 (October 2022) . - p.4528-4539
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Language development Learning mechanisms Mutual exclusivity Novelty Referent selection Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : To efficiently learn new words, children use constraints such as mutual exclusivity (ME) to narrow the search for potential referents. The current study investigated the use of ME in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and neurotypical (NT) peers matched on nonverbal cognition. Thirty-two toddlers with ASD and 26 NT toddlers participated in a looking-while-listening task. Images of novel and familiar objects were presented along with a novel or familiar label. Overall, toddlers with ASD showed less efficient looking toward a novel referent when a novel label was presented compared to NT toddlers, controlling for age and familiar word knowledge. However, toddlers with ASD and higher language ability demonstrated more robust use of ME than those with lower language ability. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05321-0 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=486