Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Fanny PAPASTAMOU |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (1)
Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Judgments of spoken discourse and impression formation of neurotypical and autistic adults / Philippine GEELHAND in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 82 (April 2021)
[article]
Titre : Judgments of spoken discourse and impression formation of neurotypical and autistic adults Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Philippine GEELHAND, Auteur ; Fanny PAPASTAMOU, Auteur ; Gaétane DELIENS, Auteur ; Mikhail KISSINE, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101742 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism First impressions Spoken discourse Adults Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Studies on impression formation in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have suggested that both ASD and neurotypical (NT) individuals extract paralinguistic cues (e.g., vocal and facial expressions) from brief extracts of social behaviors to form less favorable impressions of the personality traits of ASD individuals than of their NT peers. Yet, discourse studies in ASD have also suggested that there are specific linguistic features (e.g., conjunctions) that can distinguish the speech of ASD individuals from that of NT individuals. This study investigates whether naïve participants with and without autism can perceive discourse features previously identified as characteristic of ASD speech, based on a single exposure to conversation extracts. Methods A cross-design rating experiment was created whereby a group of ASD and NT adults (blind to diagnosis information) rated audio recordings involving ASD and NT speakers. Rating participants evaluated the recordings using a Likert scale targeting impressions of discourse features. Results ASD and NT Raters behaved similarly on the ratings of discourse features; evaluating the speech of ASD Speakers less favorably than those of NT Speakers. Conclusion Our results extend previous findings by showing that linguistic cues also lead to less favorable impressions of the discourse of ASD Speakers, and this from both the perspective of NT and ASD Raters. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101742 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 82 (April 2021) . - 101742[article] Judgments of spoken discourse and impression formation of neurotypical and autistic adults [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Philippine GEELHAND, Auteur ; Fanny PAPASTAMOU, Auteur ; Gaétane DELIENS, Auteur ; Mikhail KISSINE, Auteur . - 101742.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 82 (April 2021) . - 101742
Mots-clés : Autism First impressions Spoken discourse Adults Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background Studies on impression formation in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) have suggested that both ASD and neurotypical (NT) individuals extract paralinguistic cues (e.g., vocal and facial expressions) from brief extracts of social behaviors to form less favorable impressions of the personality traits of ASD individuals than of their NT peers. Yet, discourse studies in ASD have also suggested that there are specific linguistic features (e.g., conjunctions) that can distinguish the speech of ASD individuals from that of NT individuals. This study investigates whether naïve participants with and without autism can perceive discourse features previously identified as characteristic of ASD speech, based on a single exposure to conversation extracts. Methods A cross-design rating experiment was created whereby a group of ASD and NT adults (blind to diagnosis information) rated audio recordings involving ASD and NT speakers. Rating participants evaluated the recordings using a Likert scale targeting impressions of discourse features. Results ASD and NT Raters behaved similarly on the ratings of discourse features; evaluating the speech of ASD Speakers less favorably than those of NT Speakers. Conclusion Our results extend previous findings by showing that linguistic cues also lead to less favorable impressions of the discourse of ASD Speakers, and this from both the perspective of NT and ASD Raters. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101742 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=443