Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Anxiety behavior-therapy elective-mutism psychotherapy selective-mutism therapy'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Practitioner Review: Psychosocial interventions for children with selective mutism: a critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2005 / Sharon L. COHAN in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47-11 (November 2006)
[article]
Titre : Practitioner Review: Psychosocial interventions for children with selective mutism: a critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2005 Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Sharon L. COHAN, Auteur ; Denise A. CHAVIRA, Auteur ; Murray B. STEIN, Auteur Année de publication : 2007 Article en page(s) : p.1085–1097 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Anxiety behavior-therapy elective-mutism psychotherapy selective-mutism therapy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: There have been several reports of successful psychosocial interventions for children with selective mutism (SM), a disorder in which a child consistently fails to speak in one or more social settings (e.g., school) despite speaking normally in other settings (e.g., home). The present literature review was undertaken in order to provide an up-to-date summary and critique of the SM treatment literature published in the past fifteen years.
Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify SM treatment studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and 2005.
Results: A total of 23 studies were included in the present review. Of these, ten used a behavioral/cognitive behavioral approach, one used a behavioral language training approach, one used a family systems approach, five used a psychodynamic approach, and six used multimodal approaches to SM treatment.
Conclusions: Although much of this literature is limited by methodological weaknesses, the existing research provides support for the use of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral interventions. Multimodal treatments also appear promising, but the essential components of these interventions have yet to be established. An outline of a cognitive-behavioral treatment package for a typical SM child is provided and the review concludes with suggestions for future research.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01662.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=798
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-11 (November 2006) . - p.1085–1097[article] Practitioner Review: Psychosocial interventions for children with selective mutism: a critical evaluation of the literature from 1990–2005 [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Sharon L. COHAN, Auteur ; Denise A. CHAVIRA, Auteur ; Murray B. STEIN, Auteur . - 2007 . - p.1085–1097.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 47-11 (November 2006) . - p.1085–1097
Mots-clés : Anxiety behavior-therapy elective-mutism psychotherapy selective-mutism therapy Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background: There have been several reports of successful psychosocial interventions for children with selective mutism (SM), a disorder in which a child consistently fails to speak in one or more social settings (e.g., school) despite speaking normally in other settings (e.g., home). The present literature review was undertaken in order to provide an up-to-date summary and critique of the SM treatment literature published in the past fifteen years.
Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify SM treatment studies published in peer-reviewed journals between 1990 and 2005.
Results: A total of 23 studies were included in the present review. Of these, ten used a behavioral/cognitive behavioral approach, one used a behavioral language training approach, one used a family systems approach, five used a psychodynamic approach, and six used multimodal approaches to SM treatment.
Conclusions: Although much of this literature is limited by methodological weaknesses, the existing research provides support for the use of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral interventions. Multimodal treatments also appear promising, but the essential components of these interventions have yet to be established. An outline of a cognitive-behavioral treatment package for a typical SM child is provided and the review concludes with suggestions for future research.En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01662.x Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=798