Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Autism Discrimination-training Discrete-trial Receptive-language'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders / Anibal Jr GUTIERREZ in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3-3 (July-September 2009)
[article]
Titre : Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Anibal Jr GUTIERREZ, Auteur ; Melissa N. HALE, Auteur ; Heather A. O’BRIEN, Auteur ; Aaron J. FISCHER, Auteur ; Jennifer S. DUROCHER, Auteur ; Michael ALESSANDRI, Auteur Année de publication : 2009 Article en page(s) : p.630-638 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Discrimination-training Discrete-trial Receptive-language Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Discrete trial teaching procedures have been demonstrated to be effective in teaching a variety of important skills for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Although all discrete trial programs are based in the principles of applied behavior analysis, some variability exists between programs with regards to the precise teaching procedures used. One notable procedural discrepancy involves teaching receptive discriminations. We compared the effectiveness of two commonly used procedures to teach receptive discriminations for three young children with ASD. One procedure progressed from introducing novel target stimuli in isolation (i.e., with no distracter present) to a conditional discrimination training phase (i.e., with distracter). A second procedure involved teaching discriminations exclusively within the context of conditional discriminations (i.e., using distracter stimuli). A within-subject comparison of procedures revealed mixed results and a 1-month follow-up revealed no differences between teaching procedures. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.12.005 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=729
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 3-3 (July-September 2009) . - p.630-638[article] Evaluating the effectiveness of two commonly used discrete trial procedures for teaching receptive discrimination to young children with autism spectrum disorders [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Anibal Jr GUTIERREZ, Auteur ; Melissa N. HALE, Auteur ; Heather A. O’BRIEN, Auteur ; Aaron J. FISCHER, Auteur ; Jennifer S. DUROCHER, Auteur ; Michael ALESSANDRI, Auteur . - 2009 . - p.630-638.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 3-3 (July-September 2009) . - p.630-638
Mots-clés : Autism Discrimination-training Discrete-trial Receptive-language Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Discrete trial teaching procedures have been demonstrated to be effective in teaching a variety of important skills for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Although all discrete trial programs are based in the principles of applied behavior analysis, some variability exists between programs with regards to the precise teaching procedures used. One notable procedural discrepancy involves teaching receptive discriminations. We compared the effectiveness of two commonly used procedures to teach receptive discriminations for three young children with ASD. One procedure progressed from introducing novel target stimuli in isolation (i.e., with no distracter present) to a conditional discrimination training phase (i.e., with distracter). A second procedure involved teaching discriminations exclusively within the context of conditional discriminations (i.e., using distracter stimuli). A within-subject comparison of procedures revealed mixed results and a 1-month follow-up revealed no differences between teaching procedures. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2008.12.005 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=729