Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Child and adolescent intellectual disability screening questionnaire'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Screening for intellectual disability in autistic people: A brief report / Karen MCKENZIE in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 100 (February 2023)
[article]
Titre : Screening for intellectual disability in autistic people: A brief report Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Karen MCKENZIE, Auteur ; Dale METCALFE, Auteur ; Aja L. MURRAY, Auteur Article en page(s) : 102076 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Intellectual disability Autism spectrum disorder Screening Child and adolescent intellectual disability screening questionnaire Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background There is high co-occurrence between intellectual disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). It is important to identify people who have both conditions for clinical and research reasons. This study explored if the Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q) and Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) could accurately identify intellectual disability in autistic children and adults respectively. Method Pre-existing CAIDS-Q data for 40 autistic children and LDSQ data for 27 autistic adults were used. The participants were classified as likely to have an intellectual disability or not based on the age-appropriate cut-off score on the relevant screening tools. This was compared with their clinical diagnosis of intellectual disability. Results The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, for the CAIDS-Q were 93.1 %, 88.5 %, 90 % and 92 % respectively. The corresponding figures for the LDSQ were 75 %, 95.6 %, 75 %, and 95.6 %. Conclusions The values for the CAIDS-Q were broadly consistent with figures found in previous research. The sensitivity and PPV figures for the LDSQ, were somewhat lower. The specificity and sensitivity values for both measures were above the threshold for levels that are generally considered to be acceptable for a developmental screening tool. The results suggest that the CAIDS-Q and LDSQ may be appropriate measures to screen for intellectual disability in autistic people. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.102076 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=491
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 100 (February 2023) . - 102076[article] Screening for intellectual disability in autistic people: A brief report [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Karen MCKENZIE, Auteur ; Dale METCALFE, Auteur ; Aja L. MURRAY, Auteur . - 102076.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 100 (February 2023) . - 102076
Mots-clés : Intellectual disability Autism spectrum disorder Screening Child and adolescent intellectual disability screening questionnaire Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background There is high co-occurrence between intellectual disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). It is important to identify people who have both conditions for clinical and research reasons. This study explored if the Child and Adolescent Intellectual Disability Screening Questionnaire (CAIDS-Q) and Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) could accurately identify intellectual disability in autistic children and adults respectively. Method Pre-existing CAIDS-Q data for 40 autistic children and LDSQ data for 27 autistic adults were used. The participants were classified as likely to have an intellectual disability or not based on the age-appropriate cut-off score on the relevant screening tools. This was compared with their clinical diagnosis of intellectual disability. Results The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, for the CAIDS-Q were 93.1 %, 88.5 %, 90 % and 92 % respectively. The corresponding figures for the LDSQ were 75 %, 95.6 %, 75 %, and 95.6 %. Conclusions The values for the CAIDS-Q were broadly consistent with figures found in previous research. The sensitivity and PPV figures for the LDSQ, were somewhat lower. The specificity and sensitivity values for both measures were above the threshold for levels that are generally considered to be acceptable for a developmental screening tool. The results suggest that the CAIDS-Q and LDSQ may be appropriate measures to screen for intellectual disability in autistic people. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.102076 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=491