Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
2 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Choice-making'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Exploring maximizing, satisficing and minimizing tendency in decision-making among autistic and neurotypical individuals / Nicky ROGGE in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 92 (April 2022)
[article]
Titre : Exploring maximizing, satisficing and minimizing tendency in decision-making among autistic and neurotypical individuals Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Nicky ROGGE, Auteur Article en page(s) : 101935 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism Decision-making Choice-making Decision making tendency inventory Maximizing Satisficing Minimizing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The tendency to maximize is one of the most frequently studied personal traits in choice-making and decision-making. In spite of the large resemblances between the decision behaviour that is characteristic for maximizers and the decision behaviour displayed by individuals with autism, and the considerable overlap in the list of decision problems and decision experiences commonly reported by maximizers and individuals with autism, the question whether individuals with autism are more maximizing in decision-making as compared to neurotypical controls, has remained unexamined in the literature. The paper measures and compares the tendency to maximize, satisfice, and minimize in choice- and decision-making among autistic individuals and age, gender- and education degree-matched neurotypical individuals. Method The Decision Making Tendency Inventory measurement scale (Misuraca et al., 2015) is used to measure six types of decision-making tendency: fearful maximizing, resolute maximizing, more ambitious satisficing, less ambitious satisficing, parsimonious minimizing, and indolent minimizing. A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and comparison of the differences in latent means is performed. Results The results demonstrate that autistic individuals are similar to neurotypical individuals when it comes to having a tendency to satisfice or minimize in decision-making, however, autistic individuals do score higher in terms of adopting a fearful and resolute maximizing tendency than neurotypical individuals. Conclusions Results suggest that higher maximizing tendency may explain for some of the difficulties experienced by autistic individuals in decision-making En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101935 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=459
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 92 (April 2022) . - 101935[article] Exploring maximizing, satisficing and minimizing tendency in decision-making among autistic and neurotypical individuals [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Nicky ROGGE, Auteur . - 101935.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 92 (April 2022) . - 101935
Mots-clés : Autism Decision-making Choice-making Decision making tendency inventory Maximizing Satisficing Minimizing Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Background The tendency to maximize is one of the most frequently studied personal traits in choice-making and decision-making. In spite of the large resemblances between the decision behaviour that is characteristic for maximizers and the decision behaviour displayed by individuals with autism, and the considerable overlap in the list of decision problems and decision experiences commonly reported by maximizers and individuals with autism, the question whether individuals with autism are more maximizing in decision-making as compared to neurotypical controls, has remained unexamined in the literature. The paper measures and compares the tendency to maximize, satisfice, and minimize in choice- and decision-making among autistic individuals and age, gender- and education degree-matched neurotypical individuals. Method The Decision Making Tendency Inventory measurement scale (Misuraca et al., 2015) is used to measure six types of decision-making tendency: fearful maximizing, resolute maximizing, more ambitious satisficing, less ambitious satisficing, parsimonious minimizing, and indolent minimizing. A multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and comparison of the differences in latent means is performed. Results The results demonstrate that autistic individuals are similar to neurotypical individuals when it comes to having a tendency to satisfice or minimize in decision-making, however, autistic individuals do score higher in terms of adopting a fearful and resolute maximizing tendency than neurotypical individuals. Conclusions Results suggest that higher maximizing tendency may explain for some of the difficulties experienced by autistic individuals in decision-making En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2022.101935 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=459 A systematic review of the effects of choice on academic outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder / Colleen K. REUTEBUCH in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 20 (December 2015)
[article]
Titre : A systematic review of the effects of choice on academic outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Colleen K. REUTEBUCH, Auteur ; Farah EL ZEIN, Auteur ; Garrett J. ROBERTS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.1-16 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Choice-making Intervention Academic outcomes Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The present review synthesized single-case design studies whose interventions included a choice-making component to investigate their effects on academic behaviors in academic settings for students with autism spectrum disorder. Studies included were conducted between 1990 and 2013 with kindergarten to grade 12 students with autism spectrum disorder. Eight studies met the criteria for inclusion. We applied a multistep evaluation process to provide an overview of the quality of evidence across studies reviewed and to inform the interpretation of results from each study. Findings indicate that providing a choice component results in improvements in student (a) work completion, (b) behaviors (e.g., increase in on-task behavior, reduction in challenging behavior), and (c) affect and interest. Further, we noted that outcomes varied by design, with conditions that included a choice component outperforming the no choice component condition in both multiple-baseline and withdrawal designs, although results were mixed for studies employing an alternating-treatment design. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.08.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=270
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 20 (December 2015) . - p.1-16[article] A systematic review of the effects of choice on academic outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Colleen K. REUTEBUCH, Auteur ; Farah EL ZEIN, Auteur ; Garrett J. ROBERTS, Auteur . - p.1-16.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 20 (December 2015) . - p.1-16
Mots-clés : Autism spectrum disorder Choice-making Intervention Academic outcomes Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The present review synthesized single-case design studies whose interventions included a choice-making component to investigate their effects on academic behaviors in academic settings for students with autism spectrum disorder. Studies included were conducted between 1990 and 2013 with kindergarten to grade 12 students with autism spectrum disorder. Eight studies met the criteria for inclusion. We applied a multistep evaluation process to provide an overview of the quality of evidence across studies reviewed and to inform the interpretation of results from each study. Findings indicate that providing a choice component results in improvements in student (a) work completion, (b) behaviors (e.g., increase in on-task behavior, reduction in challenging behavior), and (c) affect and interest. Further, we noted that outcomes varied by design, with conditions that included a choice component outperforming the no choice component condition in both multiple-baseline and withdrawal designs, although results were mixed for studies employing an alternating-treatment design. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.08.002 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=270