Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'Improvement rate difference'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Video-based modeling: Differential effects due to treatment protocol / Rose A. MASON in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7-1 (January 2013)
[article]
Titre : Video-based modeling: Differential effects due to treatment protocol Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Rose A. MASON, Auteur ; Jennifer B. GANZ, Auteur ; Richard I. PARKER, Auteur ; Margot B. BOLES, Auteur ; Heather S. DAVIS, Auteur ; Mandy RISPOLI, Auteur Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : p.120-31 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Video modeling Special education Developmental disabilities Autism spectrum disorders Meta-analysis Improvement rate difference Intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Identifying evidence-based practices for individuals with disabilities requires specification of procedural implementation. Video-based modeling (VBM), consisting of both video self-modeling and video modeling with others as model (VMO), is one class of interventions that has frequently been explored in the literature. However, current information related to differential effects that occur based on variations in procedural implementation is not available. The purpose of this study was to analyze VBM with individuals with disabilities using improvement rate difference meta-analytic procedures. The impact of type of VBM and type of model was investigated as well as the differential effects that occur when VBM is implemented alone or as a component of a package. In addition, the quality of research is assessed. Results yielded an overall large effect size of .81 CI.834 [.80, .82] with a range from −.26 to .96. No statistically significant differences were found based on type of VBM. However, when disaggregated by model, differential effects were indicated with VMO with adult as model demonstrating the greatest magnitude of change. Additionally, VMO with reinforcement demonstrated greater effects then when delivered alone or as part of a package. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.08.003 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=179
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 7-1 (January 2013) . - p.120-31[article] Video-based modeling: Differential effects due to treatment protocol [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Rose A. MASON, Auteur ; Jennifer B. GANZ, Auteur ; Richard I. PARKER, Auteur ; Margot B. BOLES, Auteur ; Heather S. DAVIS, Auteur ; Mandy RISPOLI, Auteur . - 2013 . - p.120-31.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders > 7-1 (January 2013) . - p.120-31
Mots-clés : Video modeling Special education Developmental disabilities Autism spectrum disorders Meta-analysis Improvement rate difference Intervention Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Identifying evidence-based practices for individuals with disabilities requires specification of procedural implementation. Video-based modeling (VBM), consisting of both video self-modeling and video modeling with others as model (VMO), is one class of interventions that has frequently been explored in the literature. However, current information related to differential effects that occur based on variations in procedural implementation is not available. The purpose of this study was to analyze VBM with individuals with disabilities using improvement rate difference meta-analytic procedures. The impact of type of VBM and type of model was investigated as well as the differential effects that occur when VBM is implemented alone or as a component of a package. In addition, the quality of research is assessed. Results yielded an overall large effect size of .81 CI.834 [.80, .82] with a range from −.26 to .96. No statistically significant differences were found based on type of VBM. However, when disaggregated by model, differential effects were indicated with VMO with adult as model demonstrating the greatest magnitude of change. Additionally, VMO with reinforcement demonstrated greater effects then when delivered alone or as part of a package. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.08.003 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=179