Centre d'Information et de documentation du CRA Rhône-Alpes
CRA
Informations pratiques
-
Adresse
Centre d'information et de documentation
du CRA Rhône-Alpes
Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier
bât 211
95, Bd Pinel
69678 Bron CedexHoraires
Lundi au Vendredi
9h00-12h00 13h30-16h00Contact
Tél: +33(0)4 37 91 54 65
Mail
Fax: +33(0)4 37 91 54 37
-
Résultat de la recherche
1 recherche sur le mot-clé 'autism,paired-preference assessment,preference,reinforcement'
Affiner la recherche Générer le flux rss de la recherche
Partager le résultat de cette recherche Faire une suggestion
Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation / Justin B. LEAF in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33-1 (March 2018)
[article]
Titre : Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Justin B. LEAF, Auteur ; Ronald LEAF, Auteur ; Jeremy A. LEAF, Auteur ; Aditt ALCALAY, Auteur ; Daniel RAVID, Auteur ; Stephanie DALE, Auteur ; Alyne KASSARDJIAN, Auteur ; Kathleen TSUJI, Auteur ; Mitchell TAUBMAN, Auteur ; John MCEACHIN, Auteur ; Misty L. OPPENHEIM-LEAF, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.14-24 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : autism,paired-preference assessment,preference,reinforcement Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Today, the use of formal preference assessments, including paired-stimulus preference assessments, is widely utilized to help determine which items to use as reinforcers during intervention. A second way to determine potential reinforcers is to analyze multiple dimensions of a stimulus in the moment, a procedure known as in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. Although paired-stimulus preference assessments are widely used, there is no experimental evidence that extensive advance preference assessments actually produce higher rates of learning than in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. The present study compared rates of learning on a simple expressive labeling task when correct responses were reinforced with items selected based on extensive formal paired-preference assessments versus items selected by a teacher using in-the-moment analysis of reinforcer effects. The results indicated no clear difference in skill acquisition, but there were clear differences in terms of efficiency and maintenance. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616645329 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=336
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-1 (March 2018) . - p.14-24[article] Comparing Paired-Stimulus Preference Assessments With In-the-Moment Reinforcer Analysis on Skill Acquisition: A Preliminary Investigation [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Justin B. LEAF, Auteur ; Ronald LEAF, Auteur ; Jeremy A. LEAF, Auteur ; Aditt ALCALAY, Auteur ; Daniel RAVID, Auteur ; Stephanie DALE, Auteur ; Alyne KASSARDJIAN, Auteur ; Kathleen TSUJI, Auteur ; Mitchell TAUBMAN, Auteur ; John MCEACHIN, Auteur ; Misty L. OPPENHEIM-LEAF, Auteur . - p.14-24.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities > 33-1 (March 2018) . - p.14-24
Mots-clés : autism,paired-preference assessment,preference,reinforcement Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Today, the use of formal preference assessments, including paired-stimulus preference assessments, is widely utilized to help determine which items to use as reinforcers during intervention. A second way to determine potential reinforcers is to analyze multiple dimensions of a stimulus in the moment, a procedure known as in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. Although paired-stimulus preference assessments are widely used, there is no experimental evidence that extensive advance preference assessments actually produce higher rates of learning than in-the-moment reinforcer analysis. The present study compared rates of learning on a simple expressive labeling task when correct responses were reinforced with items selected based on extensive formal paired-preference assessments versus items selected by a teacher using in-the-moment analysis of reinforcer effects. The results indicated no clear difference in skill acquisition, but there were clear differences in terms of efficiency and maintenance. En ligne : https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616645329 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=336