[article] 
inJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 39-4 (July-August 2010) . - p.481-491

Titre :	Automatic Evaluations in Clinically Anxious and Nonanxious Children and Adolescents
Type de document :	Texte imprimé et/ou numérique
Auteurs :	Leentje VERVOORT, Auteur ; Lidewij H. WOLTERS, Auteur ; Sanne M. HOGENDOORN, Auteur ; Pier J. M. PRINS, Auteur ; Else DE HAAN, Auteur ; Maaike H. NAUTA, Auteur ; Frits BOER, Auteur
Année de publication :	2010
Article en page(s) :	p.481-491
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Automatic evaluations of clinically anxious and nonanxious children (n = 40, aged 8-16, 18 girls) were compared using a pictorial performance-based measure of automatic affective associations. Results showed a threat-related evaluation bias in clinically anxious but not in nonanxious children. In anxious participants, automatic evaluations of anxiety-relevant stimuli were more negative than those of negative stimuli. In nonanxious participants, evaluations of negative and anxiety-relevant stimuli did not differ. Furthermore, anxious youth had stronger negative evaluations of anxiety-relevant stimuli than nonanxious children. Automatic evaluations of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli did not differ between groups. Threat-related evaluations were predictive of parent-reported, but not child-reported, anxiety.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.486316
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108

[article] Automatic Evaluations in Clinically Anxious and Nonanxious Children and Adolescents [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Leentje VERVOORT, Auteur ; Lidewij H. WOLTERS, Auteur ; Sanne M. HOGENDOORN, Auteur ; Pier J. M. PRINS, Auteur ; Else DE HAAN, Auteur ; Maaike H. NAUTA, Auteur ; Frits BOER, Auteur . - 2010 . - p.481-491.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology > 39-4 (July-August 2010) . - p.481-491

Index. décimale :	PER Périodiques
Résumé :	Automatic evaluations of clinically anxious and nonanxious children (n = 40, aged 8-16, 18 girls) were compared using a pictorial performance-based measure of automatic affective associations. Results showed a threat-related evaluation bias in clinically anxious but not in nonanxious children. In anxious participants, automatic evaluations of anxiety-relevant stimuli were more negative than those of negative stimuli. In nonanxious participants, evaluations of negative and anxiety-relevant stimuli did not differ. Furthermore, anxious youth had stronger negative evaluations of anxiety-relevant stimuli than nonanxious children. Automatic evaluations of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli did not differ between groups. Threat-related evaluations were predictive of parent-reported, but not child-reported, anxiety.
En ligne :	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2010.486316
Permalink :	https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=108