| [article] 
					| Titre : | Psychological subtyping finds pathological, impulsive, and 'normal'groups among adolescents who self-harm |  
					| Type de document : | texte imprimé |  
					| Auteurs : | Sarah STANFORD, Auteur ; Michael P. JONES, Auteur |  
					| Année de publication : | 2009 |  
					| Article en page(s) : | p.807-815 |  
					| Langues : | Anglais (eng) |  
					| Mots-clés : | Self-harm adolescence coping-strategies psychopathology depression behaviour-problems child-development |  
					| Index. décimale : | PER Périodiques |  
					| Résumé : | Background: Research to date suggests that as many as 12–15% of young people engage in self-harm behaviour; however, the current understanding of the psychological basis of adolescent self-harm is limited. The objective was to determine whether adolescents who self-harm are a psychologically homogenous group. It was hypothesised that psychological subtypes would exist and these groups would report different rates of self-harm. 
 Method: Nine hundred and forty-four school students aged 11 to 19 and 166 first-year psychology students aged 21 or younger completed a self-report questionnaire. Participants were aged 11 to 21 (mean = 15.4, SD = 2.1). Sixty-two percent of the sample were female (n = 692). Students were allocated to psychologically distinct groups. Rates of self-harm were compared for the psychological subtypes of self-harmers.
 
 Results: Two hundred and thirty-four participants reported lifetime self-harm (21.1%; 95% CI 19–23%) and 78 reported recent self-harm (7.0%; 95% CI 6.7–7.3%). The present study identified three psychologically quite distinct groups of adolescents within those who reported self-harm – a psychologically pathological group, a psychologically 'normal' group, and an impulsive group. The pathological group reported the highest rate of recent self-harm (50.9%); the psychologically 'normal' and impulsive groups reported similar rates of self-harm (28.7% and 24.6%, respectively).
 
 Conclusions: Adolescents who self-harm are not a psychologically homogenous group. One pathological subtype of self-harmers appears to most closely reflect a number of the psychological and social factors previously associated with self-harm. However, a large proportion of the sample was allocated the psychologically 'normal' subtype. This finding highlights the importance of psychological screening of adolescents presenting for treatment for self-harm as subtypes of self-harmers may require disparate strategies for intervention. Further research is required in order to identify appropriate treatment strategies for each subtype.
 |  
					| En ligne : | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02067.x |  
					| Permalink : | https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=771 |  in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 50-7  (July 2009) . - p.807-815
 [article] Psychological subtyping finds pathological, impulsive, and 'normal'groups among adolescents who self-harm [texte imprimé] / Sarah STANFORD , Auteur ; Michael P. JONES , Auteur . - 2009 . - p.807-815.Langues  : Anglais (eng )in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry  > 50-7  (July 2009)  . - p.807-815 
					| Mots-clés : | Self-harm adolescence coping-strategies psychopathology depression behaviour-problems child-development |  
					| Index. décimale : | PER Périodiques |  
					| Résumé : | Background: Research to date suggests that as many as 12–15% of young people engage in self-harm behaviour; however, the current understanding of the psychological basis of adolescent self-harm is limited. The objective was to determine whether adolescents who self-harm are a psychologically homogenous group. It was hypothesised that psychological subtypes would exist and these groups would report different rates of self-harm. 
 Method: Nine hundred and forty-four school students aged 11 to 19 and 166 first-year psychology students aged 21 or younger completed a self-report questionnaire. Participants were aged 11 to 21 (mean = 15.4, SD = 2.1). Sixty-two percent of the sample were female (n = 692). Students were allocated to psychologically distinct groups. Rates of self-harm were compared for the psychological subtypes of self-harmers.
 
 Results: Two hundred and thirty-four participants reported lifetime self-harm (21.1%; 95% CI 19–23%) and 78 reported recent self-harm (7.0%; 95% CI 6.7–7.3%). The present study identified three psychologically quite distinct groups of adolescents within those who reported self-harm – a psychologically pathological group, a psychologically 'normal' group, and an impulsive group. The pathological group reported the highest rate of recent self-harm (50.9%); the psychologically 'normal' and impulsive groups reported similar rates of self-harm (28.7% and 24.6%, respectively).
 
 Conclusions: Adolescents who self-harm are not a psychologically homogenous group. One pathological subtype of self-harmers appears to most closely reflect a number of the psychological and social factors previously associated with self-harm. However, a large proportion of the sample was allocated the psychologically 'normal' subtype. This finding highlights the importance of psychological screening of adolescents presenting for treatment for self-harm as subtypes of self-harmers may require disparate strategies for intervention. Further research is required in order to identify appropriate treatment strategies for each subtype.
 |  
					| En ligne : | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02067.x |  
					| Permalink : | https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=771 | 
 |  |