Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: A matter of both risk and resilience / Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL in Development and Psychopathology, 26-4 (Part 1) (November 2014)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 26-4 (Part 1) (November 2014) . - p.1067-1075 Titre : Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: A matter of both risk and resilience Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Frank C. VERHULST, Auteur ; Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : p.1067-1075 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Childhood adversities have been proposed to modify later stress sensitivity and risk of depressive disorder in several ways: by stress sensitization, stress amplification, and stress inoculation. Combining these models, we hypothesized that childhood adversities would increase risk of early, but not later, onsets of depression (Hypothesis 1). In those without an early onset, childhood adversities were hypothesized to predict a relatively low risk of depression in high-stress conditions (Hypothesis 2a) and a relatively high risk of depression in low-stress conditions (Hypothesis 2b), compared to no childhood adversities. These hypotheses were tested in 1,584 participants of the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey, a prospective cohort study of adolescents. Childhood adversities were assessed retrospectively at ages 11 and 13.5, using self-reports and parent reports. Lifetime DSM-IV major depressive episodes were assessed at age 19, by means of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Stressful life events during adolescence were established using interview-based contextual ratings of personal and network events. The results provided support for all hypotheses, regardless of the informant and timeframe used to assess childhood adversities and regardless of the nature (personal vs. network, dependent vs. independent) of recent stressful events. These findings suggest that age at first onset of depression may be an effective marker to distinguish between various types of reaction patterns. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000534 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=242 [article] Childhood adversities and adolescent depression: A matter of both risk and resilience [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Frank C. VERHULST, Auteur ; Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur . - 2014 . - p.1067-1075. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 26-4 (Part 1) (November 2014) . - p.1067-1075 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Childhood adversities have been proposed to modify later stress sensitivity and risk of depressive disorder in several ways: by stress sensitization, stress amplification, and stress inoculation. Combining these models, we hypothesized that childhood adversities would increase risk of early, but not later, onsets of depression (Hypothesis 1). In those without an early onset, childhood adversities were hypothesized to predict a relatively low risk of depression in high-stress conditions (Hypothesis 2a) and a relatively high risk of depression in low-stress conditions (Hypothesis 2b), compared to no childhood adversities. These hypotheses were tested in 1,584 participants of the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey, a prospective cohort study of adolescents. Childhood adversities were assessed retrospectively at ages 11 and 13.5, using self-reports and parent reports. Lifetime DSM-IV major depressive episodes were assessed at age 19, by means of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Stressful life events during adolescence were established using interview-based contextual ratings of personal and network events. The results provided support for all hypotheses, regardless of the informant and timeframe used to assess childhood adversities and regardless of the nature (personal vs. network, dependent vs. independent) of recent stressful events. These findings suggest that age at first onset of depression may be an effective marker to distinguish between various types of reaction patterns. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000534 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=242

Effects of divorce on Dutch boys' and girls' externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Dutch Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study? / Esther NEDERHOF in Development and Psychopathology, 24-3 (August 2012)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 24-3 (August 2012) . - p.929-39 Titre : Effects of divorce on Dutch boys' and girls' externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Dutch Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study? Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p.929-39 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The effects of divorce on children's behavioral development have proven to be quite varied across studies, and most developmental and family scholars today appreciate the great heterogeneity in divorce effects. Thus, this inquiry sought to determine whether select dopaminergic genes previously associated with externalizing behavior and/or found to moderate diverse environmental effects (dopamine receptors D2 and D4, catechol-O-methyltransferase) might moderate divorce effects on adolescent self-reported externalizing problems; and, if so, whether evidence of gene–environment (G × E) interaction would prove consistent with diathesis–stress or differential-susceptibility models of environmental action. Data from the first and third wave of the Dutch Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (n = 1,134) revealed some evidence of G × E interaction reflecting diathesis–stress but not differential susceptibility. It is intriguing that some evidence pointed to “vantage sensitivity,” which are benefits accruing to those with a specific genotype when their parents remained together, the exact opposite of diathesis–stress. The limits of this work are considered, especially with regard to the conditions for testing differential susceptibility, and future directions are outlined. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000454 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=178 [article] Effects of divorce on Dutch boys' and girls' externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Dutch Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study? [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur . - 2012 . - p.929-39. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 24-3 (August 2012) . - p.929-39 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The effects of divorce on children's behavioral development have proven to be quite varied across studies, and most developmental and family scholars today appreciate the great heterogeneity in divorce effects. Thus, this inquiry sought to determine whether select dopaminergic genes previously associated with externalizing behavior and/or found to moderate diverse environmental effects (dopamine receptors D2 and D4, catechol-O-methyltransferase) might moderate divorce effects on adolescent self-reported externalizing problems; and, if so, whether evidence of gene–environment (G × E) interaction would prove consistent with diathesis–stress or differential-susceptibility models of environmental action. Data from the first and third wave of the Dutch Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (n = 1,134) revealed some evidence of G × E interaction reflecting diathesis–stress but not differential susceptibility. It is intriguing that some evidence pointed to “vantage sensitivity,” which are benefits accruing to those with a specific genotype when their parents remained together, the exact opposite of diathesis–stress. The limits of this work are considered, especially with regard to the conditions for testing differential susceptibility, and future directions are outlined. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000454 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=178

Effects of divorce on Dutch boys’ and girls’ externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Tracking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey study?—CORRIGENDUM / Esther NEDERHOF in Development and Psychopathology, 26-2 (May 2014)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 26-2 (May 2014) . - p.555-555 Titre : Effects of divorce on Dutch boys’ and girls’ externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Tracking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey study?—CORRIGENDUM Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.555-555 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000133 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=230 [article] Effects of divorce on Dutch boys’ and girls’ externalizing behavior in Gene × Environment perspective: Diathesis stress or differential susceptibility in the Tracking Adolescents’ Individual Lives Survey study?—CORRIGENDUM [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; Jay BELSKY, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur . - p.555-555. in Development and Psychopathology > 26-2 (May 2014) . - p.555-555 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000133 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=230

Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study / Jelle Jurrit SIJTSEMA in Development and Psychopathology, 25-3 (August 2013)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 25-3 (August 2013) . - p.699-712 Titre : Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Jelle Jurrit SIJTSEMA, Auteur ; Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; René VEENSTRA, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; Bruce J. ELLIS, Auteur Article en page(s) : p.699-712 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000114 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=210 [article] Effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity on aggressive/rule-breaking behavior and prosocial behavior in adolescence: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Jelle Jurrit SIJTSEMA, Auteur ; Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; René VEENSTRA, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur ; Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; Bruce J. ELLIS, Auteur . - p.699-712. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 25-3 (August 2013) . - p.699-712 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : The biological sensitivity to context hypothesis posits that high physiological reactivity (i.e., increases in arousal from baseline) constitutes heightened sensitivity to environmental influences, for better or worse. To test this hypothesis, we examined the interactive effects of family cohesion and heart rate reactivity to a public speaking task on aggressive/rule-breaking and prosocial behavior in a large sample of adolescents (N = 679; M age = 16.14). Multivariate analyses revealed small- to medium-sized main effects of lower family cohesion and lower heart rate reactivity on higher levels of aggressive/rule-breaking and lower levels of prosocial behavior. Although there was some evidence of three-way interactions among family cohesion, heart rate reactivity, and sex in predicting these outcome variables, these interactions were not in the direction predicted by the biological sensitivity to context hypothesis. Instead, heightened reactivity appeared to operate as a protective factor against family adversity, rather than as a susceptibility factor. The results of the present study raise the possibility that stress reactivity may no longer operate as a mechanism of differential susceptibility in adolescence. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000114 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=210

Effortful control as predictor of adolescents' psychological and physiological responses to a social stress test: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey / Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL in Development and Psychopathology, 23-2 (May 2011)  

Public ISBD [article]  inDevelopment and Psychopathology > 23-2 (May 2011) . - p.679-688 Titre : Effortful control as predictor of adolescents' psychological and physiological responses to a social stress test: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey Type de document : Texte imprimé et/ou numérique Auteurs : Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; Catharina A. HARTMAN, Auteur ; Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; Harriëtte RIESE, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p.679-688 Langues : Anglais (eng) Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Effortful control is thought to foster adaptive action in defensive contexts and may thereby protect individuals against anxious inhibition and focus on their own distress. We examined if effortful control predicted adolescents' perceived arousal, unpleasantness, and control as well as autonomic (heart rate [HR]) and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (cortisol) responses during social stress. The data came from a focus sample of the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey, a prospective population study of Dutch adolescents (N = 715, 50.9% girls; mean age = 16.11, SD = 0.59), who participated in a laboratory session including a social stress task (public speaking and mental arithmetic). Perceived and physiological stress measures were assessed before, during, and after the social stress task. Effortful control was measured using various questionnaires and informants, as well as by means of a reaction time (RT) task assessing response inhibition. Overall, adolescents with high questionnaire-based effortful control tended to feel more relaxed, pleasant, and in control during the laboratory session than adolescents with lower levels of control and had stronger HR responses to the stress test. Adolescent girls with high inhibitory control as measured by the RT task also had strong HR responses, but inhibitory control was associated with high rather than low perceived arousal. Our results suggest that both questionnaire and RT measures of effortful control predict strong HR responses to challenging situations, but associational patterns diverge with regard to perceived stress measures. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579411000095 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=121 [article] Effortful control as predictor of adolescents' psychological and physiological responses to a social stress test: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey [Texte imprimé et/ou numérique] / Albertine J. OLDEHINKEL, Auteur ; Catharina A. HARTMAN, Auteur ; Esther NEDERHOF, Auteur ; Harriëtte RIESE, Auteur ; Johan ORMEL, Auteur . - 2011 . - p.679-688. Langues : Anglais (eng) in Development and Psychopathology > 23-2 (May 2011) . - p.679-688 Index. décimale : PER Périodiques Résumé : Effortful control is thought to foster adaptive action in defensive contexts and may thereby protect individuals against anxious inhibition and focus on their own distress. We examined if effortful control predicted adolescents' perceived arousal, unpleasantness, and control as well as autonomic (heart rate [HR]) and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (cortisol) responses during social stress. The data came from a focus sample of the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey, a prospective population study of Dutch adolescents (N = 715, 50.9% girls; mean age = 16.11, SD = 0.59), who participated in a laboratory session including a social stress task (public speaking and mental arithmetic). Perceived and physiological stress measures were assessed before, during, and after the social stress task. Effortful control was measured using various questionnaires and informants, as well as by means of a reaction time (RT) task assessing response inhibition. Overall, adolescents with high questionnaire-based effortful control tended to feel more relaxed, pleasant, and in control during the laboratory session than adolescents with lower levels of control and had stronger HR responses to the stress test. Adolescent girls with high inhibitory control as measured by the RT task also had strong HR responses, but inhibitory control was associated with high rather than low perceived arousal. Our results suggest that both questionnaire and RT measures of effortful control predict strong HR responses to challenging situations, but associational patterns diverge with regard to perceived stress measures. En ligne : http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579411000095 Permalink : https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=121

A test of the vulnerability model: temperament and temperament change as predictors of future mental disorders – the TRAILS study / Odilia M. LACEULLE in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55-3 (March 2014)  

Permalink

The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity: An empirical test in the Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study / Bruce J. ELLIS in Development and Psychopathology, 29-3 (August 2017)  

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 7 / 7)