| [article] 
					| Titre : | Time-of-day effects in arousal: disrupted diurnal cortisol profiles in children with ADHD |  
					| Type de document : | texte imprimé |  
					| Auteurs : | Lindita IMERAJ, Auteur ; Inge ANTROP, Auteur ; Herbert ROEYERS, Auteur ; James D. SWANSON, Auteur ; Ellen DESCHEPPE, Auteur ; Sarah BAL, Auteur ; Dirk DEBOUTTE, Auteur |  
					| Année de publication : | 2012 |  
					| Article en page(s) : | p.782-789 |  
					| Langues : | Anglais (eng) |  
					| Mots-clés : | ADHD  ODD  circadian  HPA axis  cortisol  arousal |  
					| Index. décimale : | PER Périodiques |  
					| Résumé : | Background:  Fluctuations in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms related to regulatory deficits in arousal states are themselves characterized by circadian rhythms. Although cortisol is an important circadian arousal-related marker, studies focusing on across-the-day cortisol variations in ADHD are scarce. There is no study with multiple measurements to take into account interday and intraday variability. 
 Methods:  Salivary cortisol was sampled five times a day (awakening, 30 min after awakening, noon, 4 p.m., 8 p.m.) across five consecutive days in 33 children with ADHD (22 with and 11 without oppositional defiant disorder; ODD) and 33 class- and sex-matched controls (aged 6–12). The cortisol awakening response (increase from awakening to 30 min after awakening) and the diurnal cortisol profile (across-the-day variations) were compared for ADHD with ODD (ADHD + ODD) and without ODD (ADHD) subgroups and the control group.
 
 Results:  The cortisol awakening response was not significantly different between groups. However, longitudinal analyses to evaluate cortisol profiles across the day revealed a significant Group × Time effect (p < .001). More specifically, compared to each other, the ADHD subgroup showed a flatter slope with relative morning hypo-arousal and evening hyperarousal, whereas the ADHD + ODD subgroup showed a steeper slope with relative morning hyperarousal and evening hypo-arousal (p < .001).
 
 Conclusions:  Findings support time-related arousal disruptions in children with ADHD associated with the presence or absence of ODD comorbidity. We recommend research on cortisol in larger samples for a better understanding of arousal mechanisms involved in ADHD not only with and without ODD but also with other comorbidities which may have implications for timing of arousal-based treatments.
 |  
					| En ligne : | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02526.x |  
					| Permalink : | https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=166 |  in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry > 53-7  (July 2012) . - p.782-789
 [article] Time-of-day effects in arousal: disrupted diurnal cortisol profiles in children with ADHD [texte imprimé] / Lindita IMERAJ , Auteur ; Inge ANTROP , Auteur ; Herbert ROEYERS , Auteur ; James D. SWANSON , Auteur ; Ellen DESCHEPPE , Auteur ; Sarah BAL , Auteur ; Dirk DEBOUTTE , Auteur . - 2012 . - p.782-789.Langues  : Anglais (eng )in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry  > 53-7  (July 2012)  . - p.782-789 
					| Mots-clés : | ADHD  ODD  circadian  HPA axis  cortisol  arousal |  
					| Index. décimale : | PER Périodiques |  
					| Résumé : | Background:  Fluctuations in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms related to regulatory deficits in arousal states are themselves characterized by circadian rhythms. Although cortisol is an important circadian arousal-related marker, studies focusing on across-the-day cortisol variations in ADHD are scarce. There is no study with multiple measurements to take into account interday and intraday variability. 
 Methods:  Salivary cortisol was sampled five times a day (awakening, 30 min after awakening, noon, 4 p.m., 8 p.m.) across five consecutive days in 33 children with ADHD (22 with and 11 without oppositional defiant disorder; ODD) and 33 class- and sex-matched controls (aged 6–12). The cortisol awakening response (increase from awakening to 30 min after awakening) and the diurnal cortisol profile (across-the-day variations) were compared for ADHD with ODD (ADHD + ODD) and without ODD (ADHD) subgroups and the control group.
 
 Results:  The cortisol awakening response was not significantly different between groups. However, longitudinal analyses to evaluate cortisol profiles across the day revealed a significant Group × Time effect (p < .001). More specifically, compared to each other, the ADHD subgroup showed a flatter slope with relative morning hypo-arousal and evening hyperarousal, whereas the ADHD + ODD subgroup showed a steeper slope with relative morning hyperarousal and evening hypo-arousal (p < .001).
 
 Conclusions:  Findings support time-related arousal disruptions in children with ADHD associated with the presence or absence of ODD comorbidity. We recommend research on cortisol in larger samples for a better understanding of arousal mechanisms involved in ADHD not only with and without ODD but also with other comorbidities which may have implications for timing of arousal-based treatments.
 |  
					| En ligne : | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02526.x |  
					| Permalink : | https://www.cra-rhone-alpes.org/cid/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=166 | 
 |  |